Magneto wrote:
As well as a high chance of survival for the individual shot, I believe? You're not very likely to hit the heart, so as long as medical attention is prompt, they should survive...
Though I think there needs to be a lot more focus on less-lethal weapons. The aim, after all, is to knock the target down and incapacitate them, not to kill them. Perhaps arming the police with rubber bullets would be a good idea? As long as it has enough force to knock them on their back without killing them, even if it does break a few ribs...
Being hit with a rubber bullet isn't going to knock anyone much bigger than a housecat on their back. They might happen to fall backwards, but the part about being knocked backwards by a shot is nothing more than theatrical portrayals.
If being hit by a bullet was enough to knock the person on the back like we see on tv, it would likely do very serious damage to anyone firing the bullet. The bullet is not going to pick up great multiples of momentum between the firearm and the target.
Well I am glad that someone paid attention during their physics lessons at school, this sounds like something from Newtons laws of motion.
_________________
Health is a state of physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity
I am not a jigsaw, I am a free man !
Diagnosed under the DSM5 rules with autism spectrum disorder, under DSM4 psychologist said would have been AS (299.80) but I suspect that I am somewhere between 299.80 and 299.00 (Autism) under DSM4.