Kraichgauer wrote:
goofygoobers wrote:
I don't quite understand why people think autism is caused by gut issues. Is it based on some sort of research?
As far as I can figure, that crank who claimed autism was caused by vaccinations had also claimed there was some sort of connection with the gastrointestinal system. I think this is just a holdover from that bullsh*t.
That there may be a connection between autism and the gastrointestinal system is not bullsh*t. The concept was contaminated by cranks early on but is now being wrestled away from the cranks by legit researchers as more about the human microbiome is learned.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564498/Quote:
The human gut harbors a complex community of microbes that profoundly influence many aspects of growth and development, including development of the nervous system
I think nature vs nurture is a false dichotomy. Something can be both genes
and environment (internal microbial environment in this case). There is not reason to think that autism (and other things) can only be caused by one or the other.
I understand ASPartOfMe's concern upthread that this is a bid to wrestle autism away from the "born that way" message of neurodiversity. After all, many of the successes of the gay rights movement hinged on a "born that way" message and the neurodiversity rights movement could follow the same trajectory. But just because it works politically for there to be a sharp divide between the 'primarily genetic'/autism rights camp and the 'primarily environmental'/curebie camp doesn't mean the sharp divide is a biological reality. Biology is messy and sharp divides aren't that common. Much of what we perceive as sharp divides are actually human-created categories that make taxonomy easier both formally for scientists and informally in everyday language. But what actually goes on is rarely so tidy.