The American Army is broken - OFFICIAL

Post Reply New Topic

Belifs aside, where do the Chaldeans fit in the internal politics of Iraq. I know that Saddam had Aziz in his cabinet, but when the current government (if you want to call it that) was being formed, the competing interests of the Shia, Sunni, and Kurds were discussed, but I didn't hear a damned thing about the Chaldeans (aside from the current persecution they suffer from the fundamentalist Shia Muslim nutters, like you've already mentioned).

It is a misconception brought about by black ops, propoganda, gross exagerations and a concerted conspiracy to demonize Iraqis and turn people against them so that the West and Israel can slaughter in order to plunder.

The Baath party in fact was THE non sectarian party in Iraq and you may note that amongs the 15 or so medium to top echelon party members alongside Saddam who were tried and are in the process of being executed or as it would seem, slaughtered are or were in fact a mixture of Kurds, Sunnis, Shias and a Christian.

You may note also that for a party of thugs and thieves they have conducted themeselves with the utmost honour - even going to the gallows rather than say a bad word about the man who was their leader.

Apology accepted - I didn't really understand where that came from - generally speaking I'm on your side!

I pretty much know that Saddam Hussein ran a secular government and about his policy of Pan-Arabism. I think the first time I heard that he had a Christian in the upper eschelons of his government I was pretty surprised because that seemed to be out of line with the other countries in the region that are run as theocracies.

I know that life under Saddam wasn't a walk in the park, but I'm sure that most Iraqi's would probably take Saddam over the current situaion. People think I'm nuts when I say that, but I lived under a pretty oppressive regime myself and life was generally pretty good (so long as you stayed under the radar). Definitely better than a war zone, anyway.

Apology accepted - I didn't really understand where that came from - generally speaking I'm on your side!

I pretty much know that Saddam Hussein ran a secular government and about his policy of Pan-Arabism. I think the first time I heard that he had a Christian in the upper eschelons of his government I was pretty surprised because that seemed to be out of line with the other countries in the region that are run as theocracies.

I know that life under Saddam wasn't a walk in the park, but I'm sure that most Iraqi's would probably take Saddam over the current situaion. People think I'm nuts when I say that, but I lived under a pretty oppressive regime myself and life was generally pretty good (so long as you stayed under the radar). Definitely better than a war zone, anyway.

manilatwist, you overpost and underthink. There's no real point in debating these issues with a close-minded, aggressive and rude individual such as yourself. So instead, I will expose the base flaw of everything you claim:

You said:

Wrong. I have read just about everything on this whole matter over allmost two decades, your and the others cumulative information cannot come close.

Also and most importantly, being half Iraqi and half british means that i am 100 percent unbiased whereas many of you are racist, misiinformed and Xenophobic.

I say:

You do realise that everything you could possibly read is biased, including you and your own views and opinions? Nobody is '100% unbiased' like you claim to be, noone is even 1% unbiased - only ignorant. The nature of human existence is that of subjectivity.

Charming, you have proven my point. I think this thread has come to a close.

It's in my sig. Yeah they're awesome. And let's not forget Big Trouble in Little China or The Thing too
Who can say no to a good Carpenter/Russell movie?