Page 3 of 4 [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

15 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm

There are not that many toothless Confederate cattle herders left.

I agree that the guys makin' all the money are bums.

"Oh broker, I have what he's having."


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

15 Sep 2008, 8:24 pm

I got laid off because the unions I was in over-valued the worth of our labors so much that the corporate leaders had to choose between outsourcing the work or reducing the stockholders' dividends.



Coadunate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 640
Location: S. California

15 Sep 2008, 9:19 pm

I don’t know which union you were in or what you did but when

Fnord wrote:

Quote:
“over-valued the worth of our labors”


what do you really mean by that? For example, how much is a human life worth? This is what happened near Los Angeles on Friday, September 12. A “contracted” (not union or regular employee) engineer of a passenger train failing to stop at a signal because his text messaging caused the crash which lead to the death of 26 people while injuring 85. Before you and everybody else get on my case with statements like "this could happen to anyone, union or otherwise", let me make a comparison. How would you feel about an apartment or house that you rent versus a home that you own outright being damaged or lost in some way? That is the difference between union and “contracted” employment. I wonder how the stock holder dividends are doing when fewer satisfied customers buy fewer of their products.



http://gizmodo.com/5050222/death-toll-r ... t-the-time

Image



Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

16 Sep 2008, 7:57 am

Seems to me that the global economy operates on a "butterfly effect". Every day, something occurs in a far away land that suddenly, for no appreciable reason, makes everything i do more expensive. At every link in the chain, things get worse, and the news sound more panicked, and chaos ensues, regardless of whether the initial event was major (a bank becoming bankrupt) or minor (someone suggests someone else might be an unwise investment. Wall Street s**ts bricks at the drop of a hat ( Hat share values slashed by half after gravity occurs on headwear! Shock news!) and like the father of the boy who cried wolf, I'm getting jaded about the whole thing. Planes fly into things = wall street panic. Computer bug never actually happens = Wall Street Panic. China has a bigger industrial complex because health and safety is something only the west does = Wall Street Panics.

I sometimes wonder if it isn't just the greed of investment brokers realising that a slight devaluation of something or other means they wont get paid as many thousands of dollarpounds. Did anyone normal have a Lehman bank account, or a Lehman debit card? Or are the real victims just the everyday workers who got binned without warning, because telling them to prepare would have....
made Wall Street Panic?


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

16 Sep 2008, 8:08 am

There's a lot of herd mentality in investment. The herd doesn't make money. The thoughtful, educated individualist makes money.


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 80
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

16 Sep 2008, 9:25 am

Macbeth wrote:
Seems to me that the global economy operates on a "butterfly effect". Every day, something occurs in a far away land that suddenly, for no appreciable reason, makes everything i do more expensive. At every link in the chain, things get worse, and the news sound more panicked, and chaos ensues, regardless of whether the initial event was major (a bank becoming bankrupt) or minor (someone suggests someone else might be an unwise investment. Wall Street s**ts bricks at the drop of a hat ( Hat share values slashed by half after gravity occurs on headwear! Shock news!) and like the father of the boy who cried wolf, I'm getting jaded about the whole thing. Planes fly into things = wall street panic. Computer bug never actually happens = Wall Street Panic. China has a bigger industrial complex because health and safety is something only the west does = Wall Street Panics.

I sometimes wonder if it isn't just the greed of investment brokers realising that a slight devaluation of something or other means they wont get paid as many thousands of dollarpounds. Did anyone normal have a Lehman bank account, or a Lehman debit card? Or are the real victims just the everyday workers who got binned without warning, because telling them to prepare would have....
made Wall Street Panic?


Well said :!:



MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

16 Sep 2008, 10:24 am

Yes, members of the herd got burned.


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

16 Sep 2008, 12:51 pm

Coadunate wrote:
I don’t know which union you were in or what you did but when

Fnord wrote:

Quote:
“over-valued the worth of our labors”


what do you really mean by that? For example, how much is a human life worth?

What I mean is that the cost of labor drove the sales price of our products higher than what the market was willing to pay. If the employer had reduced the cost of the product to be competitive, then the employer would have had to reduce the dividends to the investors, since they were contracturally obligated to provide a certain wage to its hourly workers. Since workers are an expense, and investors are income (or as shareholders, they have some say in the income of the employer's non-hourly management and administration), the employer determined that the most effective cost-cutting method was to outsource hourly labor. And that's how we got laid off.

Do not confuse the value of labor with the value of life. Labor and life are two different things, and you can have one without the other (life without labor = unemployment; labor without life = robotics).

Especially, do not even try to equate mass layoffs with a massive loss of life. Again, labor is not life.



Prof_Pretorius
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,520
Location: Hiding in the attic of the Arkham Library

16 Sep 2008, 5:00 pm

Interesting article. Overly long, but quite illuminating in regards to how the house of cards got built up so fast. Read through the part about what happened to the CEOs, it'll make you good and angry.

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestn ... 4494032.jp


_________________
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow. I feel my fate in what I cannot fear. I learn by going where I have to go. ~Theodore Roethke


Zeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 633
Location: Singapore

16 Sep 2008, 7:07 pm

I reincarnate as ming on a Singapore stock message board and this is what I wrote about Lehman's demise on Monday night Singapore time as the reality that Lehman was being liquidated sunk in. It has been a rough few days because psychologically I had expected Lehman to announce sealed capital raising initiatives that would have sparked a global rally. Instead that dick head Richard Fuld told the world that he was going to do nothing.

My apologies to the board. I was wrong, people do care about Lehman after all. :lol:

ming wrote:
What happened to Lehman is profoundly disturbing. Not for what it says about the financial system, because I believe that the system is secure, but for the picture that it paints of what went on behind the scenes. Fuld was in regular contact with Bernanke and Paulson and he must have known what was expected of him. Whatever he chose to do, Fuld had to restore confidence in Lehman and that confidence had to be solid. Even if he did not want KDB as an investor, there were offers for Neuberger Berman on the table; why did he not take that? It is disturbing to me because it seems that Fuld chose this outcome. Investment bankers are known to pragmatists, and certainly a fixed income trader would operate almost by default within logical parameters. How could Fuld have chosen to do this to Lehman Brothers? What would have induced him to not deliver when he had been given all that time and space?

The news articles hint at a lot of ugliness. All the heads of the various major banks attended meetings to discuss what should be done about Lehman, but no one from Lehman was there. It was like Lehman was dead to them even before time ran out. Over the weekend it was clear that Lehman needed to do a deal with Barclays or Bank of America. Everyone understands that it is not in Lehman’s favor, but in the absence of a deal, there is certain destruction. The press says that the hurdle to a deal was the American Government’s unwillingness to provide any support, but I think a deal did not happen because Lehman actively opposed it. The U.S. Government is not providing any support to the proposed Bank of America acquisition of Merrill Lynch and Merrill is no less exposed to the mortgage market than Lehman is, but that deal is going ahead, or so we have been told. So the lack of government support cannot be the stumbling block. No deal, so there must be liquidation. To forestall that, Lehman wants to claim Chapter 11 protection. But broker-dealers cannot be protected the way an airline or automobile manufacturer can be protected. There are almost no hard assets on the balance sheet, only financial instruments. If you add the numbers up and there is a hole, no amount of court protection is going to make that go away. The Chapter 11 filing was futile from the very beginning.

They must have been trying to stare down the government in the belief that the government would not let them fail. How silly is that? No one on the other side can afford to let people think that they are weak. The country is fighting two wars for heaven’s sake and you think that they would not let Lehman fail? They would do it just to make the point that no one must ever cross them. How else will everything hold together?

Lehman’s heroism is not going to make any difference. There is just way too much money waiting to be put to work. The interested parties have money and everyone else has money that has been piling up now that all major markets have sold off. All that is needed is a spark and that should have been Lehman’s honor. Instead, we have this sickening mess. The SEC has started to move accounts from Lehman and other brokers are frantically trying to unwind their trades with them. Already Lehman has been fatally damaged, but by the end of this week, the bones would have been picked clean. Markets are not going to crash because of Lehman. There are some very powerful interests who will take care of that. So what was all this for?



pezar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,432

16 Sep 2008, 9:47 pm

MrMark wrote:
There's a lot of herd mentality in investment. The herd doesn't make money. The thoughtful, educated individualist makes money.


Somebody, I don't know who, came up with the term "electronic herd". The electronic herd is all those expensively educated, narcissistic graduates of top business schools who have somehow been placed in charge of trillions of dollars worth of investments at the touch of their fingertips via instant electronic communications. The herd are all friends, they all party at the same New York nightclubs, they all drink the same brand of very expensive vodka, they all furnish their overpriced lofts with the same brand of overpriced furniture.

When one herd member gets the idea that Something Big is going down, suddenly they all know about it via their networks, and suddenly they all get on those computers and go buckwild. Suddenly, the market makes wild swings up or down, with down usually being worse. The market can drop 200 points in minutes because of these idiots. The herd runs on emotion, if something bad happens then the sky is falling and the stock has to be dumped.

They turn rumor into reality. They get the idea that a big business will fail, suddenly they are all selling the stock, and the unfortunate CEO is forced to raise cash which he now can't do because the herd won't let him, so the business goes under. The herd then congratulates itself for being geniuses, when in fact they created a self-fulfilling prophecy but are too dumb to realize it. Now it's the herd themselves who are being thinned, done in by their own stupidity, so by golly they'll take capitalism with them. That'll show us! I for one are being glad that the herd is being dethroned, as long as they don't bring down the world economy with them.

In the Khmer Rouge labor camps, a common torture was to dump a bowl of rice porridge on a starving peasant, forcing him to lick futilely at the streams of gruel running down his face. Should I see a member of the electronic herd sitting next to me at the soup counter, downing a bowl of chicken noodle, I will not hesitate to dump it on his head and watch him panic from a safe distance.

It has been great for me that business schools have turned out thousands of graduates who have been taught not to think. -Warren Buffett

I crossed out thinking/It won't get me ahead -Dead Kennedys, "Terminal Preppy"



Coadunate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 640
Location: S. California

16 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm

Fnord wrote:

Quote:
Especially, do not even try to equate mass layoffs with a massive loss of life. Again, labor is not life.


I think you misunderstood me. I was never trying to equate mass layoffs with massive loss of life. What I was saying was that the replacement of dedicated and loyal workers with contracted workers who don’t have any guarantees about the future of their employment may at times cause them to be negligent enough to cause a loss of life as in my train wreck example.

Quote:
What I mean is that the cost of labor drove the sales price of our products higher than what the market was willing to pay. If the employer had reduced the cost of the product to be competitive, then the employer would have had to reduce the dividends to the investors, since they were contracturally obligated to provide a certain wage to its hourly workers. Since workers are an expense, and investors are income (or as shareholders, they have some say in the income of the employer's non-hourly management and administration), the employer determined that the most effective cost-cutting method was to outsource hourly labor. And that's how we got laid off.




There is a time to consider profit and then there is a time to consider ethics. Those who seem to quote God and his laws are usually the last to heed them.
The people may consider profit when they buy something but maybe they should be reminded once again that “you get what you pay for”. When people opt for cheap products (like recent Chines ones) and cheap transportation then they risk and cheapen their own lives by paying for it. I wonder however, how many people in my train wreck example chose public transportation in place of driving to work for all the right reasons but were foiled by the fact that Metrolink like the company you worked for never managed to value life over money. In turn, as company chairman’s and CEOs these people have a greater responsibility because of their greater status to ethically consider public welfare more than the average person or, for that matter, the bottom line ;.but instead they all seem to strive to become Horatio Alger stories. They forget that greater power demands greater morals. When an animal or child is being mistreated at a scene who has the greater responsibility to intervene, an adult or another child there? Even more shameful is the negligence of the current government, who owes it’s existence to the public, to intervene. As a CEO if you can't reduce the cost of the product to be competitive or reduce the dividends to the investors maybe you should just quit. Isn't that basically what the Bush White House said for Scott McClellan? : "If McClellan didn’t like the war and couldn’t do a good job in good conscience, why didn’t he resign?"



Berk
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 62
Location: UK

17 Sep 2008, 9:52 am

Meh. Hello, first post from me and I don't mean to sound rude but......

Educate yourselves - look up 'money masters' on google

It's all smoke and mirrors. Our (European and US) economy is built on the biggegest scam in history. At the end of the day this 'crisis', which like the great depression is manufactured, will only make the real money men even more powerful and able to control even more people by debt. Debt is slavery of the free. This is why we have 'cycles', when times are good money is like confetti, we are told to spend spend spend. 'Oh need some more, here have £50,000 to play with'. Then when things just get a little too good it's time to flip everything on it's head, oh I'll be wanting that 50k back, ta. This is why people are encouraged to live beyond their means when times are good, those at the top know when the collapse is coming and want everyone else to empty their pockets and even better, take out loans they won't be able to afford, before they tighten the flow of money. So when the time comes and everything turns to s**t and the loans are called in, you have a whole lot of people with, nothing. You'll find people are a lot easier to push around when they are desperate, I'm just hoping people get so desperate they fight back, we all know that is never likely to happen though. All that will happen is that the big financial houses will be forced to merge and create an even smaller playing field after the recovery.

Wars have been faught over this, millions have suffered and died all for the pleasure of a privileged few. Heck, Hitler and the Bolsheviks were funded from New York and London! It does not take a genius to figure out who makes all the profits from the conflicts over the world and why the developing world will probably never be developed.

The ironic thing is that modern banking was created by the bankers charging interest to loan money that they never had to start with, they made money out of thin air. Our whole society was built on imaginary money :), if anyone else tried to pull this scam they would face an awful long stretch in prison.

As for the current situation well, once things have got pretty bad The Fed will simply pull some more money out it's ass to level things out. It controls the boom and bust cycle, from there it is like a domino effect. This is the price the whole world pays for centralised banking - our finacial destiny and (as money rules the world) our lives rest in the hands of a few greedy men.

The Bank of England, the Fed and the IMF etc are the real tyrants of the world, the real 'terrorists' that threaten the freedom of the average citizen.



Last edited by Berk on 17 Sep 2008, 11:13 am, edited 2 times in total.

monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

17 Sep 2008, 10:39 am

Zeno wrote:

Re: No one here cares about Lehman huh?

It figures.

Autism = Belly Gazing Narcissism


Actually, what can I do? Grumble? Ok ... grumble grumble grumble.

The Fed is going to what ever it thinks is appropriate - they are going to try to save the ones that are so big that their failure would bring down the system. They are going to let others fail.



Berk
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 62
Location: UK

17 Sep 2008, 11:17 am

The system NEEDS to collapse to save humanity from this insanity!


_________________
The media is the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power, because they control the minds of the masses - Malcom X


Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,211
Location: Houston, Texas

17 Sep 2008, 6:24 pm

Berk wrote:
Meh. Hello, first post from me and I don't mean to sound rude but......

Educate yourselves - look up 'money masters' on google

It's all smoke and mirrors. Our (European and US) economy is built on the biggegest scam in history. At the end of the day this 'crisis', which like the great depression is manufactured, will only make the real money men even more powerful and able to control even more people by debt. Debt is slavery of the free. This is why we have 'cycles', when times are good money is like confetti, we are told to spend spend spend. 'Oh need some more, here have £50,000 to play with'. Then when things just get a little too good it's time to flip everything on it's head, oh I'll be wanting that 50k back, ta. This is why people are encouraged to live beyond their means when times are good, those at the top know when the collapse is coming and want everyone else to empty their pockets and even better, take out loans they won't be able to afford, before they tighten the flow of money. So when the time comes and everything turns to sh** and the loans are called in, you have a whole lot of people with, nothing. You'll find people are a lot easier to push around when they are desperate, I'm just hoping people get so desperate they fight back, we all know that is never likely to happen though. All that will happen is that the big financial houses will be forced to merge and create an even smaller playing field after the recovery.

Wars have been faught over this, millions have suffered and died all for the pleasure of a privileged few. Heck, Hitler and the Bolsheviks were funded from New York and London! It does not take a genius to figure out who makes all the profits from the conflicts over the world and why the developing world will probably never be developed.

The ironic thing is that modern banking was created by the bankers charging interest to loan money that they never had to start with, they made money out of thin air. Our whole society was built on imaginary money :), if anyone else tried to pull this scam they would face an awful long stretch in prison.

As for the current situation well, once things have got pretty bad The Fed will simply pull some more money out it's ass to level things out. It controls the boom and bust cycle, from there it is like a domino effect. This is the price the whole world pays for centralised banking - our finacial destiny and (as money rules the world) our lives rest in the hands of a few greedy men.

The Bank of England, the Fed and the IMF etc are the real tyrants of the world, the real 'terrorists' that threaten the freedom of the average citizen.


Welcome to WP!


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!