Indigenous Peoples' March Washington, DC

Page 21 of 34 [ 541 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 34  Next

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 10:30 am

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 10:31 am

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 10:33 am

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 10:35 am

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 10:36 am

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 10:40 am

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 10:42 am

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 10:44 am

Wendy Osefo?

I gotta stop here, my fingers are getting tired...



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

03 Feb 2019, 11:24 am

I'm glad you put so much time and effort into that, but I was referring to Nick Sandman vs Nathan Phillips, as to who ended up a victim after the Jan 19th brief completely non-violent confrontation.

I don't blame the left for trying to deflect attention away from all the wishes and threats of physical violence and murder to a kid for smiling.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,443
Location: Long Island, New York

03 Feb 2019, 11:54 am

EzraS wrote:

I don't blame the left for trying to deflect attention away from all the wishes and threats of physical violence and murder to a kid for smiling.


I do.

They have had little problem calling for somebody to resign for an offensive costume he wore 35 years ago but expressed desire for actual physical violence and wanting to take names for the purpose of life long stigmatization NOW, the silence is deafening.

So I quess the unwritten social rules of 2019 are this. If a person wears something deemed or actually racist it is ok to either threaten or wish harm on them, as long as you never ever wore anything or said anything actually deemed racist yourself. Got it.

“Don’t judge somebody by the way they look” or “don’t judge a book by it’s cover”, do these need to be erased from history or is it ok to put them in a museum? Same question for the idea that people are redeemable.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 03 Feb 2019, 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

03 Feb 2019, 12:01 pm

And the hatchet job by left wing media.



AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 12:28 pm

EzraS wrote:
I'm glad you put so much time and effort into that, but I was referring to Nick Sandman vs Nathan Phillips, as to who ended up a victim after the Jan 19th brief completely non-violent confrontation.

I don't blame the left for trying to deflect attention away from all the wishes and threats of physical violence and murder to a kid for smiling.

I know exactly what you were referring to. My point is that for anything that can piss off someone on the internet, some as*hole will make a death threat. Don't get all snowflaky about it, this is the world we live in.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

03 Feb 2019, 2:33 pm

EzraS wrote:
I'm glad you put so much time and effort into that, but I was referring to Nick Sandman vs Nathan Phillips, as to who ended up a victim after the Jan 19th brief completely non-violent confrontation.

I don't blame the left for trying to deflect attention away from all the wishes and threats of physical violence and murder to a kid for smiling.


While death threats are almost never justified, that kid's a f*****g liar, IMO.

He was wearing a symbol of racism while smuggly staring down an Indigenous Elder. He knows damned well how he was perceived & why, and the BS news interview and WH support is all just a blowback coverup.

Perhaps you're just not good enough with facial expressions to understand?


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

03 Feb 2019, 3:16 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
EzraS wrote:

I don't blame the left for trying to deflect attention away from all the wishes and threats of physical violence and murder to a kid for smiling.


I do.

They have had little problem calling for somebody to resign for an offensive costume he wore 35 years ago but expressed desire for actual physical violence and wanting to take names for the purpose of life long stigmatization NOW, the silence is deafening.

So I quess the unwritten social rules of 2019 are this. If a person wears something deemed or actually racist it is ok to either threaten or wish harm on them, as long as you never ever wore anything or said anything actually deemed racist yourself. Got it.

“Don’t judge somebody by the way they look” or “don’t judge a book by it’s cover”, do these need to be erased from history or is it ok to put them in a museum? Same question for the idea that people are redeemable.


Anti gun people threaten to murder pro gun people. Ironic no? Mean according to the, we pro gun people are suppose to all be murders who love violence but it’s them threatening violence. And don’t forget it’s ok to physically assault with no reason anyone suspected of being a Nazi.



goldfish21
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

03 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm

sly279 wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
EzraS wrote:

I don't blame the left for trying to deflect attention away from all the wishes and threats of physical violence and murder to a kid for smiling.


I do.

They have had little problem calling for somebody to resign for an offensive costume he wore 35 years ago but expressed desire for actual physical violence and wanting to take names for the purpose of life long stigmatization NOW, the silence is deafening.

So I quess the unwritten social rules of 2019 are this. If a person wears something deemed or actually racist it is ok to either threaten or wish harm on them, as long as you never ever wore anything or said anything actually deemed racist yourself. Got it.

“Don’t judge somebody by the way they look” or “don’t judge a book by it’s cover”, do these need to be erased from history or is it ok to put them in a museum? Same question for the idea that people are redeemable.


Anti gun people threaten to murder pro gun people. Ironic no? Mean according to the, we pro gun people are suppose to all be murders who love violence but it’s them threatening violence. And don’t forget it’s ok to physically assault with no reason anyone suspected of being a Nazi.


Sly, you have posted yourself that if gun control legislation passes in your state that it's time for either homicide against those who seek to control guns or suicide. That makes you a gun nut prone to violence who probably shouldn't be allowed to own guns at all. IMO YMMV. It's very ironic that you're posting as if you're some level headed non violent recreational gun owner defending citizens rights to keep and bear arms when it's verifiable fact that you've posted passive threats of gun violence to others and yourself here on wrongplanet.

As for nazis, I wouldn't say it's okay to assault a Suspected nazi, only a known one. But that's just My personal opinion.


_________________
No :heart: for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Feb 2019, 4:19 pm

sly279 wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
EzraS wrote:

I don't blame the left for trying to deflect attention away from all the wishes and threats of physical violence and murder to a kid for smiling.


I do.

They have had little problem calling for somebody to resign for an offensive costume he wore 35 years ago but expressed desire for actual physical violence and wanting to take names for the purpose of life long stigmatization NOW, the silence is deafening.

So I quess the unwritten social rules of 2019 are this. If a person wears something deemed or actually racist it is ok to either threaten or wish harm on them, as long as you never ever wore anything or said anything actually deemed racist yourself. Got it.

“Don’t judge somebody by the way they look” or “don’t judge a book by it’s cover”, do these need to be erased from history or is it ok to put them in a museum? Same question for the idea that people are redeemable.


Anti gun people threaten to murder pro gun people. Ironic no? Mean according to the, we pro gun people are suppose to all be murders who love violence but it’s them threatening violence. And don’t forget it’s ok to physically assault with no reason anyone suspected of being a Nazi.

I don't judge anti-choice advocates based on the actions of abortion clinic bombers, and you shouldn't be judging political positions based on extremists.