Bravo5150 wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
In my opinion, it doesn't matter if he had terminal cancer, a heart condition, and was choking on a pretzel. He did not deserve to be body slammed, or have someone kneel on his neck as he begged for air helplessly, in handcuffs, without assistance.
Police are paid to protect us, not to kill people or help us out the door.
Thank goodness there is a proper autopsy, though.
Are you saying my toxicology question is irrelevant?
Toxicology is relevant in order for the autopsy to be completed, and all of the results or factors are needed in this investigation.
However, if cops decide to tackle a suspect who is restrained in handcuffs with neck compression and brute force, they must realise some people will be on drugs on have underlying medical conditions. They're taking that chance. There is no guarantee all suspects are of perfect health. Put him in the car or let him writhe on the ground safely if he's incoherent / irrational or acting deranged (which he wasn't, according to eyewitness reports).
I don't understand for the life of me, why such force was deemed necessary once he was restrained.
Why did Dylann Roof get a bullet-proof vest and free Burger King after murdering nine black people?
I doubt it's because they inquired about Roof's medical conditions and determined he wasn't fit for asphyxiation.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles