DW_a_mom wrote:
I'm glad Fnord was able to isolate the issue. I was under the wrong impression in this thread as to what Matrix Glitch supports and is trying to argue for.
I'm a moderate/independent like VegetableMan. But many misunderstand him too and jump to wrong conclusions, so at least I don't feel singled out.
DW_a_mom wrote:
The problem with convicting Trump IMHO is that he's very good at playing what I call the "what the definition of "is", is, game." He says things without actually saying them. Which inevitably creates reasonable doubt.
If there's something concrete to nail him with, those games aren't going to work. They only work because of the anecdotal evidence that's been presented thus far.