16yo Thunberg: She’s the MVP Aspie of the world! IMO

Page 23 of 34 [ 531 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 34  Next

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

16 Dec 2019, 11:35 am

I would probably irritated with her if I were her father. I would not want to deny myself the opportunity of flying to places so I can explore them. Her parents feel differently than I would feel. They believe more in what she is saying about climate change.

I am certainly not an climate-change alarmist.

But....I don't feel people should be attacking Greta personally.

Attack her ideas---fine. But not her.



Sahn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,503
Location: UK

16 Dec 2019, 11:48 am

EzraS wrote:
Climate change global apocalypse has been made political by the left saying the contributors to the impending end of the world are big business, the free market, capitalism and conservatives. Eliminate those and ta da the planet is saved. What most people who have been convinced the earth is coming to an end unless the planet goes hammer and sickle seem to know is based on magazine articles, climate change websites, and a teenage dropout.


Even big oil company's internal reviews acknowledge that CO2 emisions are warming the climate. If some people are angry that millions have been spent on covering up the facts which pose a real threat, that's quite justified.

I understand that you don't like the hyperbole but big business has to be held accountable. As for the free market, capitalism and conservatives getting some of the flak, is that coming from Greta or Time Magazine?

Assessing ExxonMobil's climate change communications (1977–2014)

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f


Quote:
ExxonMobil's 72 peer-reviewed publications focus almost exclusively on methods and mitigation (section S3, supplementary information). Only 10 discuss the potential impacts of AGW (figure 1(b)), of which 60% (6/10) take a position of 'Acknowledge', 30% (3/10) of 'Doubt', and 10% (1/10) of 'Acknowledge and Doubt' (figure 2(b)). Hoffert et al (2002), for example (see table 4), warned that unchecked greenhouse gas emissions 'could eventually produce global warming comparable in magnitude but opposite in sign to the global cooling of the last Ice Age...Atmospheric CO2 stabilization targets as low as 450 ppm could be needed to forestall coral reef bleaching, thermohaline circulation shutdown, and sea level rise from disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet' [108]. A 1994 paper defined 'mean global warming of 2 °C from preindustrial time to 2100 as Illustrative Reference Values for climate and ecosystem protection,' two years before the EU adopted this limit



Last edited by Sahn on 16 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,219
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Dec 2019, 11:52 am

EzraS wrote:
My point is that a lot of the same people bemoaning the criticism of Greta Thunberg, would be leveling harsh criticism at her if she had taken up a position they don't like and or agree with.


So basically, your point is that people criticize those they disagree with and those people are only not criticizing her because they agree with her and her position?

Golly gee, colour me shocked and chagrined.

I'm sure we'd pat each other on the back more often if we agreed about more issues too.


_________________
I was ashamed of myself when I realised life was a costume party and I attended with my real face
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

16 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I would probably irritated with her if I were her father. I would not want to deny myself the opportunity of flying to places so I can explore them. Her parents feel differently than I would feel. They believe more in what she is saying about climate change.

I am certainly not an climate-change alarmist.

But....I don't feel people should be attacking Greta personally.

Attack her ideas---fine. But not her.


So saying something critical about a public speaker's demeanor is taboo?



envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,031
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria

16 Dec 2019, 12:21 pm

What aspects of her demeanour are you uncomfortable with?


_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?


my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

16 Dec 2019, 12:21 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
EzraS wrote:
My point is that a lot of the same people bemoaning the criticism of Greta Thunberg, would be leveling harsh criticism at her if she had taken up a position they don't like and or agree with.


So basically, your point is that people criticize those they disagree with and those people are only not criticizing her because they agree with her and her position?

Golly gee, colour me shocked and chagrined.

I'm sure we'd pat each other on the back more often if we agreed about more issues too.


It's the typical sanctimonious hypocrisy that I am pointing out smart aleck. "How dare they?! Attacking an autistic child! <wipe away tear>.

Like I said in another thread; Those same types slammed an autistic boy plenty of times. I really felt like they were trying to bully me off WP. So maybe you can see why I'm cynical regarding their show of pious outrage.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

16 Dec 2019, 12:28 pm

envirozentinel wrote:
What aspects of her demeanour are you uncomfortable with?


Me personally? None. But apparently saying something like she needs to chill out some is highly offensive, bullying and immoral or whatever.

This notion that people who say things about her demeanor like chill out or joke about "how DARE you?!" are feeling threatened or uncomfortable is absurd. Like I said if she's too young/fragile to receive the same kinds of comments other public speakers get, she needs to be taken out of the spotlight until she is an adult.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

16 Dec 2019, 12:30 pm

It's not "taboo"----it's just not nice.

I wouldn't seek to drive anybody from WrongPlanet for having an opinion. That's ridiculous.

Only if somebody espouses Nazism, Incel ideology, abortion of autistic babies, things like that.



envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,031
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria

16 Dec 2019, 12:37 pm

Well I think Trump's just jealous because he wanted to be Time's Person of the Year himself. No one else must steal the show!

Which is why he has to say something. Not for him the motto "if you can't say something nice rather don't say anything at all".


_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?


my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

16 Dec 2019, 12:46 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
It's not "taboo"----it's just not nice.

I wouldn't seek to drive anybody from WrongPlanet for having an opinion. That's ridiculous.

Only if somebody espouses Nazism, Incel ideology, abortion of autistic babies, things like that.


I got both slammed for what I said and how they thought I was acting. Really they just wanted to get me to shut up. Most of them are gone now.

Ironically the person who started this thread claimed because I am autistic I had the maturity level of a young child and other put downs intended to discredit me because my age. And even recently a very pro-Greta person basically disqualified me as being "just a kid". Even though I am an adult now.



Last edited by EzraS on 16 Dec 2019, 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

16 Dec 2019, 12:52 pm

You have a right to be here----just like they have a right to be here (as long as they are following the rules).

If I get "slammed," I just slam them back----but in a nicer way than how they "slammed me."

But so they will get the message.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,219
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Dec 2019, 1:04 pm

EzraS wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
EzraS wrote:
My point is that a lot of the same people bemoaning the criticism of Greta Thunberg, would be leveling harsh criticism at her if she had taken up a position they don't like and or agree with.


So basically, your point is that people criticize those they disagree with and those people are only not criticizing her because they agree with her and her position?

Golly gee, colour me shocked and chagrined.

I'm sure we'd pat each other on the back more often if we agreed about more issues too.


It's the typical sanctimonious hypocrisy that I am pointing out smart aleck. "How dare they?! Attacking an autistic child! <wipe away tear>.

Like I said in another thread; Those same types slammed an autistic boy plenty of times. I really felt like they were trying to bully me off WP. So maybe you can see why I'm cynical regarding their show of pious outrage.


Firstly, if you had of stood up for some substantial cause and Obama repeatedly criticized you on some sort of social media, he would have received a similar level of outrage as Trump's behaviour towards Ms. Thunberg did. By the standards Trump operates at, his negative comments towards her have been relatively measured, let's face it, if he called her 'that ret*d Norwegian girl who isn't even a 9' no one would have been shocked. But, he speaks from a position that once demanded great respect, and that power imbalance is part of what leaves a bad taste in people's mouths. The president of Brazil was ruder than Trump was, but he's a less significant figure. Trump's minions are often far worse towards her, but it's immaterial to just block them and get on with life.

Personally, I've called some of what's been directed towards her cruel and needlessly insulting, but no need for tears, that's the nature of the internet. I largely agree that if it's too much to ask of her that she should be encouraged to go back to being as normal as possible and let someone a few years older handle it for at least a few years. Why should someone that age be expected to devote that much energy and time to that sort of cause when they still have a bunch of other important personal priorities to deal with, many of which are somewhat time-sensitive.

This is somewhat of a tangent, but the bolded kind of stood out to me. This seems to be a really common experience on here, and it makes me curious how often the posters who've made other posters feel like they're be driven off are even aware that's the impact they're having, let alone intending it. It seems to be fairly universal, in the sense that people from all over the political spectrum have complained about it in the years I've been here. Between a general tendency to phrase things fairly bluntly and a tendency to take criticisms personally, I'm not sure this is an unexpected trend on a forum focused on ASD.

Perhaps those posters who are to fragile to deal with discussing social and political issues and the comments that result should refrain, or would it that be an unfair expectation? It's certainly a lot less negativity (how often does one get disagreement from more than a half-dozen people on here?) to deal with, and entirely from similarly irrelevant nobodies.

Or would it be more reasonable to expect that everyone make more of an effort to try to avoid causing butthurt when they disagree?

I don't have an answer, but I know you're not alone in that experience.

For what it's worth, there's posters I both disagree with and dislike, but most of the posters I disagree with I'm fairly neutral or somewhat positive towards as people.


_________________
I was ashamed of myself when I realised life was a costume party and I attended with my real face
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,219
Location: Right over your left shoulder

16 Dec 2019, 1:05 pm

EzraS wrote:
And even recently a very pro-Greta person basically disqualified me as being "just a kid". Even though I am an adult now.


They understand that disqualifies her too, right? :lol:


_________________
I was ashamed of myself when I realised life was a costume party and I attended with my real face
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

16 Dec 2019, 1:20 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
EzraS wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
EzraS wrote:
My point is that a lot of the same people bemoaning the criticism of Greta Thunberg, would be leveling harsh criticism at her if she had taken up a position they don't like and or agree with.


So basically, your point is that people criticize those they disagree with and those people are only not criticizing her because they agree with her and her position?

Golly gee, colour me shocked and chagrined.

I'm sure we'd pat each other on the back more often if we agreed about more issues too.


It's the typical sanctimonious hypocrisy that I am pointing out smart aleck. "How dare they?! Attacking an autistic child! <wipe away tear>.

Like I said in another thread; Those same types slammed an autistic boy plenty of times. I really felt like they were trying to bully me off WP. So maybe you can see why I'm cynical regarding their show of pious outrage.


Firstly, if you had of stood up for some substantial cause and Obama repeatedly criticized you on some sort of social media, he would have received a similar level of outrage as Trump's behaviour towards Ms. Thunberg did. By the standards Trump operates at, his negative comments towards her have been relatively measured, let's face it, if he called her 'that ret*d Norwegian girl who isn't even a 9' no one would have been shocked. But, he speaks from a position that once demanded great respect, and that power imbalance is part of what leaves a bad taste in people's mouths. The president of Brazil was ruder than Trump was, but he's a less significant figure. Trump's minions are often far worse towards her, but it's immaterial to just block them and get on with life.

Personally, I've called some of what's been directed towards her cruel and needlessly insulting, but no need for tears, that's the nature of the internet. I largely agree that if it's too much to ask of her that she should be encouraged to go back to being as normal as possible and let someone a few years older handle it for at least a few years. Why should someone that age be expected to devote that much energy and time to that sort of cause when they still have a bunch of other important personal priorities to deal with, many of which are somewhat time-sensitive.

This is somewhat of a tangent, but the bolded kind of stood out to me. This seems to be a really common experience on here, and it makes me curious how often the posters who've made other posters feel like they're be driven off are even aware that's the impact they're having, let alone intending it. It seems to be fairly universal, in the sense that people from all over the political spectrum have complained about it in the years I've been here. Between a general tendency to phrase things fairly bluntly and a tendency to take criticisms personally, I'm not sure this is an unexpected trend on a forum focused on ASD.

Perhaps those posters who are to fragile to deal with discussing social and political issues and the comments that result should refrain, or would it that be an unfair expectation? It's certainly a lot less negativity (how often does one get disagreement from more than a half-dozen people on here?) to deal with, and entirely from similarly irrelevant nobodies.

Or would it be more reasonable to expect that everyone make more of an effort to try to avoid causing butthurt when they disagree?

I don't have an answer, but I know you're not alone in that experience.

For what it's worth, there's posters I both disagree with and dislike, but most of the posters I disagree with I'm fairly neutral or somewhat positive towards as people.


It's only relevant to me because the same types who are saying everyone must be all nicey nice to Greta because she is an autistic teenager, were not that way towards me. I wasn't all that butthurt by it. I took satisfaction in giving as good as I got. Even though it earned me some official warnings.



smudge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,716
Location: Moved on

16 Dec 2019, 1:22 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
This is somewhat of a tangent, but the bolded kind of stood out to me. This seems to be a really common experience on here, and it makes me curious how often the posters who've made other posters feel like they're be driven off are even aware that's the impact they're having, let alone intending it. It seems to be fairly universal, in the sense that people from all over the political spectrum have complained about it in the years I've been here. Between a general tendency to phrase things fairly bluntly and a tendency to take criticisms personally, I'm not sure this is an unexpected trend on a forum focused on ASD.

Perhaps those posters who are to fragile to deal with discussing social and political issues and the comments that result should refrain, or would it that be an unfair expectation? It's certainly a lot less negativity (how often does one get disagreement from more than a half-dozen people on here?) to deal with, and entirely from similarly irrelevant nobodies.

Or would it be more reasonable to expect that everyone make more of an effort to try to avoid causing butthurt when they disagree?

I don't have an answer, but I know you're not alone in that experience.

For what it's worth, there's posters I both disagree with and dislike, but most of the posters I disagree with I'm fairly neutral or somewhat positive towards as people.


(All about me) I sometimes wonder if I have inadvertently driven posters away from here before, or if I am one of those "passive aggressive" posters a few in this forum bring up. I kind of don't really know my social status on this forum.


_________________
I've left WP.


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

16 Dec 2019, 1:30 pm

smudge wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
This is somewhat of a tangent, but the bolded kind of stood out to me. This seems to be a really common experience on here, and it makes me curious how often the posters who've made other posters feel like they're be driven off are even aware that's the impact they're having, let alone intending it. It seems to be fairly universal, in the sense that people from all over the political spectrum have complained about it in the years I've been here. Between a general tendency to phrase things fairly bluntly and a tendency to take criticisms personally, I'm not sure this is an unexpected trend on a forum focused on ASD.

Perhaps those posters who are to fragile to deal with discussing social and political issues and the comments that result should refrain, or would it that be an unfair expectation? It's certainly a lot less negativity (how often does one get disagreement from more than a half-dozen people on here?) to deal with, and entirely from similarly irrelevant nobodies.

Or would it be more reasonable to expect that everyone make more of an effort to try to avoid causing butthurt when they disagree?

I don't have an answer, but I know you're not alone in that experience.

For what it's worth, there's posters I both disagree with and dislike, but most of the posters I disagree with I'm fairly neutral or somewhat positive towards as people.


(All about me) I sometimes wonder if I have inadvertently driven posters away from here before, or if I am one of those "passive aggressive" posters a few in this forum bring up. I kind of don't really know my social status on this forum.


There are some who are too fragile to be involved in internet discussions. I think it's often more them realizing that and leaving, rather than you or anyone driving them away.