Page 264 of 538 [ 8600 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267 ... 538  Next

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

03 Apr 2020, 3:11 pm

There’s considerable speculation that pangolins are the “intermediate hosts,” though this is far from proven.

I haven’t seen any speculation about ferrets.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,804
Location: Right over your left shoulder

03 Apr 2020, 3:18 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:
jimmy m wrote:
This is the abstract of a paper out of China:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes the infectious disease COVID-19, which was first reported in Wuhan, China in December, 2019. Despite the tremendous efforts to control the disease, COVID-19 has now spread to over 100 countries and caused a global pandemic. SARS-CoV- 2 is thought to have originated in bats; however, the intermediate animal sources of the virus are completely unknown. Here, we investigated the susceptibility of ferrets and animals in close contact with humans to SARS-CoV-2. We found that SARS-CoV-2 replicates poorly in dogs, pigs, chickens, and ducks, but efficiently in ferrets and cats. We found that the virus transmits in cats via respiratory droplets. Our study provides important insights into the animal reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 and animal management for COVID-19 control.

Source: Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and different domestic animals to SARS-coronavirus-2


Are you saying that you believe this jimmy?

Are cats and .... ferrets 8O .... actually carriers, or are you pointing out their poor science?

I've often wondered why they say animals can't contract COVID from humans, but it apparently started with animals.


Cats and ferrets are both potential carriers of a number of viruses. My understanding is that so far we're not certain which animals can get infected with SARS-CoV-2 or how readily they can be infected. Obviously since this started in an animal population there's animals that can be infected, but the fact that infects bats and possibly some other mammals doesn't mean it has a high potential to infect the animals we're most prone to keeping in our homes.

Just like there's diseases that we can catch from animals but that aren't prone to being spread between humans, it's possible that some animals can catch this from us but not transmit it between each other.

From the sounds of Jimmy's article it appears that cats and ferrets can catch it from us and from other members of their species, meanwhile dogs, pigs and fowl don't become infected enough to spread it among themselves or back to us.

I'd imagine talking about 'animals' is an over-simplification and that you'd need to go species by species to have a real understanding of how it impacts non-human animals.

It's interesting that ferrets and cats can carry it but dogs can't, dogs and ferrets are much more closely related than either are to cats.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.


jimmy m
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,570
Location: Indiana

03 Apr 2020, 3:21 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:
Are you saying that you believe this jimmy?
Are cats and .... ferrets 8O .... actually carriers, or are you pointing out their poor science?
I've often wondered why they say animals can't contract COVID from humans, but it apparently started with animals.


I don't know! The study needs to be replicated, preferably outside China. But it might explain the reports a few weeks ago of Chinese dropping pets from high buildings to their deaths.


_________________
Author of Practical Preparations for a Coronavirus Pandemic.
A very unique plan. As Dr. Paul Thompson wrote, "This is the very best paper on the virus I have ever seen."


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

03 Apr 2020, 3:25 pm

We can’t get most animal diseases; and animals mostly can’t get our diseases.

Just because the SARS-2 virus “replicates well” in cats doesn’t necessarily mean we can give COVID-19 to them....nor can they necessarily give it to us.



IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,422
Location: Chez Quis

03 Apr 2020, 3:26 pm

jimmy m wrote:
It might explain the reports a few weeks ago of Chinese dropping pets from high buildings to their deaths.



Um, what?!


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,422
Location: Chez Quis

03 Apr 2020, 3:29 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
jimmy m wrote:
This is the abstract of a paper out of China:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes the infectious disease COVID-19, which was first reported in Wuhan, China in December, 2019. Despite the tremendous efforts to control the disease, COVID-19 has now spread to over 100 countries and caused a global pandemic. SARS-CoV- 2 is thought to have originated in bats; however, the intermediate animal sources of the virus are completely unknown. Here, we investigated the susceptibility of ferrets and animals in close contact with humans to SARS-CoV-2. We found that SARS-CoV-2 replicates poorly in dogs, pigs, chickens, and ducks, but efficiently in ferrets and cats. We found that the virus transmits in cats via respiratory droplets. Our study provides important insights into the animal reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 and animal management for COVID-19 control.

Source: Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and different domestic animals to SARS-coronavirus-2


Are you saying that you believe this jimmy?

Are cats and .... ferrets 8O .... actually carriers, or are you pointing out their poor science?

I've often wondered why they say animals can't contract COVID from humans, but it apparently started with animals.


Cats and ferrets are both potential carriers of a number of viruses. My understanding is that so far we're not certain which animals can get infected with SARS-CoV-2 or how readily they can be infected. Obviously since this started in an animal population there's animals that can be infected, but the fact that infects bats and possibly some other mammals doesn't mean it has a high potential to infect the animals we're most prone to keeping in our homes.

Just like there's diseases that we can catch from animals but that aren't prone to being spread between humans, it's possible that some animals can catch this from us but not transmit it between each other.

From the sounds of Jimmy's article it appears that cats and ferrets can catch it from us and from other members of their species, meanwhile dogs, pigs and fowl don't become infected enough to spread it among themselves or back to us.

I'd imagine talking about 'animals' is an over-simplification and that you'd need to go species by species to have a real understanding of how it impacts non-human animals.

It's interesting that ferrets and cats can carry it but dogs can't, dogs and ferrets are much more closely related than either are to cats.


My cat has had some type of respiratory pneumonia for months. He actually has all the symptoms of COVID for humans.
I noticed the similarity some time ago and I've been giving him human antibiotics which help.

This article scared me because I've been wondering all along if there was an animal link.

I know that nothing's definitive but it's still pretty scary.


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

03 Apr 2020, 3:35 pm

Darmok wrote:
What might be going on here?

Woman walks around Walmart (?) and deliberately touches all the display items:


Any interpretation of this? Anyone seen other examples?


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


BTDT
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 7,577

03 Apr 2020, 3:36 pm

There are plant viruses that can spread between different species. I think some roses got viruses from apple trees via grafting experiments.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,804
Location: Right over your left shoulder

03 Apr 2020, 3:45 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
jimmy m wrote:
This is the abstract of a paper out of China:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes the infectious disease COVID-19, which was first reported in Wuhan, China in December, 2019. Despite the tremendous efforts to control the disease, COVID-19 has now spread to over 100 countries and caused a global pandemic. SARS-CoV- 2 is thought to have originated in bats; however, the intermediate animal sources of the virus are completely unknown. Here, we investigated the susceptibility of ferrets and animals in close contact with humans to SARS-CoV-2. We found that SARS-CoV-2 replicates poorly in dogs, pigs, chickens, and ducks, but efficiently in ferrets and cats. We found that the virus transmits in cats via respiratory droplets. Our study provides important insights into the animal reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 and animal management for COVID-19 control.

Source: Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and different domestic animals to SARS-coronavirus-2


Are you saying that you believe this jimmy?

Are cats and .... ferrets 8O .... actually carriers, or are you pointing out their poor science?

I've often wondered why they say animals can't contract COVID from humans, but it apparently started with animals.


Cats and ferrets are both potential carriers of a number of viruses. My understanding is that so far we're not certain which animals can get infected with SARS-CoV-2 or how readily they can be infected. Obviously since this started in an animal population there's animals that can be infected, but the fact that infects bats and possibly some other mammals doesn't mean it has a high potential to infect the animals we're most prone to keeping in our homes.

Just like there's diseases that we can catch from animals but that aren't prone to being spread between humans, it's possible that some animals can catch this from us but not transmit it between each other.

From the sounds of Jimmy's article it appears that cats and ferrets can catch it from us and from other members of their species, meanwhile dogs, pigs and fowl don't become infected enough to spread it among themselves or back to us.

I'd imagine talking about 'animals' is an over-simplification and that you'd need to go species by species to have a real understanding of how it impacts non-human animals.

It's interesting that ferrets and cats can carry it but dogs can't, dogs and ferrets are much more closely related than either are to cats.


My cat has had some type of respiratory pneumonia for months. He actually has all the symptoms of COVID for humans.
I noticed the similarity some time ago and I've been giving him human antibiotics which help.

This article scared me because I've been wondering all along if there was an animal link.

I know that nothing's definitive but it's still pretty scary.


Please don't give your cat human antibiotics, among reasons if it's SARS-CoV-2 they won't do anything because antibiotics can't target viral infections.

Further, not all animals metabolize drugs the same way, that's why dogs and cats die if they eat (too much) chocolate. The theobromine hits animals like that harder because they can't process it the same way as us. The same is true with horses but they're so big it's sometimes used as a performance enhancing drug.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.


Last edited by funeralxempire on 03 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

IsabellaLinton
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Nov 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 72,422
Location: Chez Quis

03 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
IsabellaLinton wrote:
jimmy m wrote:
This is the abstract of a paper out of China:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes the infectious disease COVID-19, which was first reported in Wuhan, China in December, 2019. Despite the tremendous efforts to control the disease, COVID-19 has now spread to over 100 countries and caused a global pandemic. SARS-CoV- 2 is thought to have originated in bats; however, the intermediate animal sources of the virus are completely unknown. Here, we investigated the susceptibility of ferrets and animals in close contact with humans to SARS-CoV-2. We found that SARS-CoV-2 replicates poorly in dogs, pigs, chickens, and ducks, but efficiently in ferrets and cats. We found that the virus transmits in cats via respiratory droplets. Our study provides important insights into the animal reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 and animal management for COVID-19 control.

Source: Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and different domestic animals to SARS-coronavirus-2


Are you saying that you believe this jimmy?

Are cats and .... ferrets 8O .... actually carriers, or are you pointing out their poor science?

I've often wondered why they say animals can't contract COVID from humans, but it apparently started with animals.


Cats and ferrets are both potential carriers of a number of viruses. My understanding is that so far we're not certain which animals can get infected with SARS-CoV-2 or how readily they can be infected. Obviously since this started in an animal population there's animals that can be infected, but the fact that infects bats and possibly some other mammals doesn't mean it has a high potential to infect the animals we're most prone to keeping in our homes.

Just like there's diseases that we can catch from animals but that aren't prone to being spread between humans, it's possible that some animals can catch this from us but not transmit it between each other.

From the sounds of Jimmy's article it appears that cats and ferrets can catch it from us and from other members of their species, meanwhile dogs, pigs and fowl don't become infected enough to spread it among themselves or back to us.

I'd imagine talking about 'animals' is an over-simplification and that you'd need to go species by species to have a real understanding of how it impacts non-human animals.

It's interesting that ferrets and cats can carry it but dogs can't, dogs and ferrets are much more closely related than either are to cats.


My cat has had some type of respiratory pneumonia for months. He actually has all the symptoms of COVID for humans.
I noticed the similarity some time ago and I've been giving him human antibiotics which help.

This article scared me because I've been wondering all along if there was an animal link.

I know that nothing's definitive but it's still pretty scary.


Please don't give your cat human antibiotics, among reasons if it's SARS-CoV-2 they won't do anything because antibiotics can't target viral infections.

Further, not all animals metabolize drugs the same way, that's why dogs and cats die if they eat (too much) chocolate.


It's with my vet's approval. No worries, I wouldn't just wing it. It's weighted and dosed properly and he's had the same med before from the vet.


_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,804
Location: Right over your left shoulder

03 Apr 2020, 3:49 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:
It's with my vet's approval. No worries, I wouldn't just wing it. It's weighted and dosed properly and he's had the same med before from the vet.


Oh okay, the point about antibiotics not targeting viruses still applies but at least it's not a hazard.

Well, actually there is one hazard, overuse of antibiotics is contributing to the rise of antibiotic resistant bacteria, but it would be silly for me to give you s**t over that when factory farms and feedlots are pumping thousands of animals full of unnecessary antibiotics every day.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.


blooiejagwa
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Dec 2017
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,793

03 Apr 2020, 3:57 pm

Image


_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill


blooiejagwa
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Dec 2017
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,793

03 Apr 2020, 4:02 pm

Darmok wrote:
Darmok wrote:
What might be going on here?

Woman walks around Walmart (?) and deliberately touches all the display items:


Any interpretation of this? Anyone seen other examples?


She might have some form of OCD is the least accusatory guess I can make.


_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill


eikonabridge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Sep 2014
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 929

03 Apr 2020, 4:38 pm

Fnord wrote:
How the current CoViD-19 mortality rates compare.

Italy: 12.07%
Netherlands: 9.46%
Spain: 9.29%
France: 9.11%
U.K.: 8.66%
Belgium: 6.82%
Iran: 6.19%
Sweden: 5.48%
P.R.C.: 4.07%
Brazil: 4.05%
Switzerland: 2.97%
Portugal: 2.49%
U.S.A.: 2.47%
Turkey: 1.96%
S.Korea: 1.73%
Austria: 1.48%
Germany: 1.31%
Canada: 1.23%
Norway: 1.02%
Israel: 0.53%
Australia: 0.53%

A lot of countries are under-testing, either intentionally (e.g. Sweden) or due to the lack of test kits. That's why you see high mortality rates. So, we have to take the Australian number as the upper limit. Sure, there is typically about 5 to 7 day lag between the cases stat and fatalities stat. Another factor is asymptomatic cases. We'll keep those things in mind. The two effects tend to cancel a bit.

From the number of deaths in some Italian cities, as compared to last year's number of deaths, we know COVID-19 caused 3+ times of deaths, in addition. Let us say 1/3 of that was due to regular illnesses that couldn't be handled in hospitals due to the healthcare system being overwhelmed. So, COVID-19 should be at very least twice as deadly as seasonal flu. At the very least.

Seasonal flu's mortality rate is typically quoted at 0.1% level. I would say multiply that by 4, and we should get a pretty good ballpark number.

That is, the true mortality rate of Covid-19 should stand around 0.4%. If I have to give an error bar, I would say 0.3% to 0.5%, or somewhere between one third and one half percent.


_________________
Jason Lu
http://www.eikonabridge.com/


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,804
Location: Right over your left shoulder

03 Apr 2020, 4:52 pm

jimmy m wrote:
I don't know! The study needs to be replicated, preferably outside China. But it might explain the reports a few weeks ago of Chinese dropping pets from high buildings to their deaths.


People get a little loopy after a few weeks caged up. :wink:


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

03 Apr 2020, 4:57 pm

IsabellaLinton wrote:

My cat has had some type of respiratory pneumonia for months. He actually has all the symptoms of COVID for humans.
I noticed the similarity some time ago and I've been giving him human antibiotics which help.

This article scared me because I've been wondering all along if there was an animal link.

I know that nothing's definitive but it's still pretty scary.


If your cat has had it for months,
If it is transferable,
If you, or your family, haven't contracted it,
I think it safe to say it isn't a problem. :wink:

But, of course, I am simply speculating.
If it was me, I wouldn't throw my cat out of a high building, yet. :wink: