Janissy wrote:
Is Seanmw the only one who read the article?
i read the article (which is vague about the abuses that led to their removal) and had read about them before.
the name alone (aside from issues related to it that i suggested in my previous post) is an indication of something seriously wrong in the household. this is what probably led to child protective services keeping an eye on them in the first place.
and i do agree with jojobean kids raised in a hateful environment aren't allowed to reason. same kids raised by anti-abortion extremists who are forced to be activists (holding signs at rallies and that kind of thing) for a cause they aren't old enough to understand. not a fair way to bring someone up.
children are not toys.
_________________
Now a penguin may look very strange in a living room, but a living room looks very strange to a penguin.