ruveyn wrote:
Why couldn't gun ownership/use be a test right, such as being licensed to drive a motor vehicle. To get the permit or license one would have to be of age, not a convicted felon or inmate of a psychiatric clinic and one would have to pass tests practical and written. If the thing could be administered fairly and in a non-corrupt manner (no bribing the testers) that should answer the objections or fears that many people have concerning firearms.
In Switzerland and Israel where men of a certain age are obliged to perform militia duty, possession of automatic and semi-automatic fire arms is widespread, but there is no sign of excessive homicide by use of firearms. So merely having the firearm is no sure predictor that it will be misused. And in the context of a militia (presumable legal and well ordered) there is training and discipline for firearm use.
ruveyn
Yes! I've wondered this myself. To legally drive I have to prove I know what I'm doing and am somewhat likely to do it responsibly. I even have to have insurance in case I hurt someone. My doctor has to have lots of education and malpractice insurance. Someone with a gun is making life and death decisions, so why not the same with guns?
Though I'm still not convinced that would prevent some nut from using one to hurt other people. But then I'm not for banning guns. I'm for readily accessible mental health care.