Page 4 of 4 [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,454
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Dec 2012, 2:43 am

John_Browning wrote:
It would be a lot easier to read if you guys didn't quote the entire thread every post!


I know, I know. It's sometimes difficult to remember when you're creating a mile long of quotes if you're into a conversation.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

24 Dec 2012, 12:14 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

I have nothing against guns themselves, or gun owners. I'm against the cult of gun worship, and the notion that gun rights are unlimited, and supersedes all other rights that accompanies said gun cult.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


However, nothing supersedes the right of self defense. That is the one right that is absolute for humans. The right preserve one's own life and the life of one's own family. It is inherently pro-survival and is virtually wired in to human being by way of Darwinian Selection.

ruveyn



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 68,820
Location: Over there

24 Dec 2012, 12:47 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
John_Browning wrote:
It would be a lot easier to read if you guys didn't quote the entire thread every post!
I know, I know. It's sometimes difficult to remember when you're creating a mile long of quotes if you're into a conversation.
...and I've just spent the best part of 10 minutes tidying that mess up. Again. :roll:
Please, pretty please - just use the "post reply" button and if you need to quote something, quote only the extract you're responding to.


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,454
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Dec 2012, 12:54 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

I have nothing against guns themselves, or gun owners. I'm against the cult of gun worship, and the notion that gun rights are unlimited, and supersedes all other rights that accompanies said gun cult.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


However, nothing supersedes the right of self defense. That is the one right that is absolute for humans. The right preserve one's own life and the life of one's own family. It is inherently pro-survival and is virtually wired in to human being by way of Darwinian Selection.

ruveyn


Legitimate defense is one thing, but bringing guns somewhere they're not wanted just to rub that right in someone else' face is quite another.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



BlueAbyss
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Age: 68
Gender: Female
Posts: 414
Location: California, USA

24 Dec 2012, 1:16 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Why couldn't gun ownership/use be a test right, such as being licensed to drive a motor vehicle. To get the permit or license one would have to be of age, not a convicted felon or inmate of a psychiatric clinic and one would have to pass tests practical and written. If the thing could be administered fairly and in a non-corrupt manner (no bribing the testers) that should answer the objections or fears that many people have concerning firearms.

In Switzerland and Israel where men of a certain age are obliged to perform militia duty, possession of automatic and semi-automatic fire arms is widespread, but there is no sign of excessive homicide by use of firearms. So merely having the firearm is no sure predictor that it will be misused. And in the context of a militia (presumable legal and well ordered) there is training and discipline for firearm use.

ruveyn
Yes! I've wondered this myself. To legally drive I have to prove I know what I'm doing and am somewhat likely to do it responsibly. I even have to have insurance in case I hurt someone. My doctor has to have lots of education and malpractice insurance. Someone with a gun is making life and death decisions, so why not the same with guns?

Though I'm still not convinced that would prevent some nut from using one to hurt other people. But then I'm not for banning guns. I'm for readily accessible mental health care.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

24 Dec 2012, 5:09 pm

BlueAbyss wrote:

Though I'm still not convinced that would prevent some nut from using one to hurt other people. But then I'm not for banning guns. I'm for readily accessible mental health care.


Nothing will prevent insane acts. In spite of our best efforts to curtail or deter them, they will happen now and again.

ruveyn