Google Dude's Rant
Well, I've seen comments online from men that have totally given up on people, especially women. Their words have become harsh. If I find an example I'll let you know, none come to mind right now.
It's when you stop being able to see the good in people, that's bitterness. Everyone has a little good in them. Even Google dude.
hurtloam wrote:
Well, I've seen comments online from men that have totally given up on people, especially women. Their words have become harsh. If I find an example I'll let you know, none come to mind right now.
It's when you stop being able to see the good in people, that's bitterness. Everyone has a little good in them. Even Google dude.
It's when you stop being able to see the good in people, that's bitterness. Everyone has a little good in them. Even Google dude.
The men at love-shy.com are extremely angry towards women but a lot of them seem to be more mad about how they aren't "banging b*****s" because machismo (Not true masculinity) culture told them if they aren't, they are not real men. Some have turned to hookers or, if they are from the northern states, want to move down to the Bible Belt because it's supposedly an anti-feminist utopia.
I am not like those men at all. If I could just have one good girlfriend, I would be happy. I don't need a huge record of relationships.
hurtloam wrote:
Lintar wrote:
hurtloam wrote:
They're buying into a dog eat dog philosophy because it makes logical sense, but what they really need is the exact same thing we all need. Love, respect and understanding.
"Dog-eat-dog" philosophies never make any sense, logical or otherwise.
Please elaborate, I'm interested.
I didn't see this response, because so much has been happening lately, and I haven't been able to access a computer for the last few days. Anyway, I meant that one simply cannot live by them consistently, or apply them to society and expect them to actually work. For example, the Libertarian belief that taxation can be equated with "theft" by the government is supremely silly for the simple reason that even the most die-hard follower of this so-called political philosophy has at some point in time, out of sheer necessity, used government services (ex. they at some point went to school, or drove on a road provided for via taxes, or called on the help of the police or fire services). A true, consistent Libertarian would have had to have lived in the wild with the wolves, relying entirely on their own wits and resources the whole time, and not called on anyone for any reason, because they also believe that selfish individualism trumps all else, and one should never call on anyone else for anything (unless they can, and are willing to pay for it, but then again isn't it the dreaded government that prints money in the first place?).
Libertarianism is for adolescents who haven't seriously examined the relevant issues, or the underlying assumptions that go with it.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Russian court fines Google more than world’s GDP |
31 Oct 2024, 8:42 am |
Majorie Taylor Green rant |
07 Dec 2024, 5:08 pm |