Biscuitman wrote:
Dear_one wrote:
I'm astounded that you have not taken an interest in her cause
If by her cause you mean being more environmentally friendly then I do take an interest. I do my bit in the same way many do. i have not taken an interest in her personally though and I known next to nothing about her. She writes on her social media account about something she is passionate about and seems to have struck a chord with many others I guess. I think that is a good thing.
The "way many do" their bit is clearly insufficient. Our world is built for profitable waste, so we have to do a lot of custom work to live on a share of sustainable size. I have seen the world population triple, so all the goals of my grandfathers have to be re-evaluated and generally abandoned as too environmentally expensive now.
I don't know of anyone who is able to live sustainably without withdrawing from society. We don't have a full set of tools for advanced work that don't involve trade-offs - limiting oneself to currently available "Green" options is crippling - we all have to use offsets and tax ourselves for remediaton to build more green stuff. Even the effort we put into separating our garbage is often wasted, as the recycling is done so badly.
Somehow, we have to build a whole new technology and economy that includes taking pollution back out of the air. Technically, it can be done, but the bankers are not on board yet. We can make synthetic liquid fuel and sequester some carbon on the side using a windmill to process air for about what many pay for gasoline now, but there is still tremendous momentum in the oil business. Even our wars are mostly about market share in a market that should be abolished.