Autistic (Asperger) Student had 900 child porn collection

Post Reply New Topic

It's very clear. A naked kid butt is not child porn, and looking at a picture of a naked kid butt does not make someone a paedophile. [People in Britain have been convicted for buying books legally commercially published in the United States.]

There was a news article recently of a woman getting pissed because a grocery store refused to put a picture of her grand-kid on a birthday cake, because there policy stated "no nudity". My guess is that you would side with the grocery store with their strong statement against child porn, rather than the dissolution of our rights of speech through corporate policies?

And I mean full frontal and not just a kid's butt. If it isn't child porn, then its not illegal in the US.

Kids playing naked in the front yard, kids in the tub, kids at a nudist family gathering - none of those are child porn. But put a fully clothed kid in front of an adult in an erotic pose, and then that is child pornography and is illegal.

The point I am trying to make is that NOT ALL photos of nude children in the US are illegal or considered child porn. Nor does a child have to be nude in order to be illegal.

As a nurse, I've seen lots of new fathers take nude photos of their babies almost the instant they were born and even during the childbirth. Those photos are not illegal.

You know damn well what I mean.

I know damn well what you want to mean, i.e. what you want this man to have done. Kinda sick of you to want that.

Why do you defend this piece of sh*t? Why?

I haven't defended you at all...?

Why are you attatcking me for having the right to make drawings of any nature, create computer generated graphics of any nature, being permitted to take photos of any person I am legally allowed to have sex with (i.e. 17 years old), and being permitted to take photos of my own child in the nude?

The problem is that people with dirty minds always equate nudity with sex. The two are completely unrelated concepts.

Not completely.

Another budding pornographer, I see.

I am not amused by your libelous comments.

People.


A moment here.

Last time I checked, and this is in Britain, so I don't know all the specifics about British law, except a few things that I don't need or want to know. But here in America, and specially on the West Coast (Washington through California and Canada {if Canada counts}) but there are stringent laws that go into affect here on this type of situation.

Child pornography last I saw is on the same line as Meth labs, and the like, the fact that you will go to jail for such an occurrence is most assured, however, not only that, but it's labeled as the fact (we're talking Porn here now) that not only will you have to register as a sex offender, but you'll have to notify a neighborhood that has children in it, especially those under the ages of 5, (I don't remember where I read this, but it's accurate, or close to) because those are the ones that are most at risk, according to data figures in Washington (I'm Tacoma area by the way, and this is way prevalent out here....uber) and as such, there are at least a hundred per month, if not more registered offenders living in the greater Tacoma if not Seattle area, probably more in Seattle, because it's Seattle and well....yeah.

It should also be evident here, that if you want to know information on these people, you can. Percentage of how many are male to female, you'll get that. and as far as I've seen, there are more men then women doing this, in the past month, (that I've had time to read) I've seen maybe one woman, out of all men, all by the way, over the ages of 50. Now that doesn't mean that under teh age of 50 aren't doing it, however, those who are over the age of 50, are the ones more inclined to do it, because of access that children might have to their jobs.

IN ANY OF YOUR ARGUMENTS, THAT ALL OF YOU(ROGUE, YOU ESPECIALLY) DID I SEE JOB STATUS ANYWHERE THAT RELATES.

THIS is pertinent, because those that I've read about in the past month, have either been teachers (past cases now coming to light, excluding the priests, that's in a file elsewhere that i'm not touching for right now) or day care workers.

The sex ring busts are another thing, those are international, and those are harder, one or two people in possesion may be a small bust if they were part of a ring, but that ring's going to be keep on going, minus two workers, and a handful or more of freed children who probably were coerced into this.

May I once again remind you that most of these pictures that we find on the web, at least the ones that seem questionable, those that look like the people in them are a bit young? That's because those are probably people who payed money to try and escape their living conditions, but as such, were tricked and ended up doing that, something that they have no control over. This relates to prostitution, but I won't go into that, but Child Sex Rings, and Prositution at least in some of the Asiatic countries are related, and as such, there's a reason that it's called Sex Tourism....remember that please, next time you're all having petty arguments. (rogue, I'm talking to you here, especially)

In relation to the man who was autistic who was arrested(back to my original point) If you were to read the bios of any of these offenders, there might be something in there that says ADD or Autism related to that affect. You know what? That doesn't mean Jack diddly. They got caught, they got arrested. AND THEY DIDN"T HIDE BEHIND ASPERGERS OR AUTISM IF THEY HAD IT, and I'll tell you why.

Because unlike America, Britain is a bit less stricter on certain things, but with this, this person's dad I believe, did a coward's approach with an excuse, something that I find on my list of things that are disgusting as uberdisgusting.

What is Britian and UK in general less strict on? I'll tell you: Gay Rights; over there it isn't a big deal, as people are making it in America with the whole Man and Woman not Woman and Woman or Man and Man. over there they're looked on as cool, (No references to Elton John by the way) Crossdressers, not a big deal. transexuals, not a big deal. Where here, stuff like that, is looked upon as they have issues.

To me, this topic should only be three pages in length, because I only read about three pages worth of stuff that I deemed as good arguments (Rogue, you had a few, but not a lot.)


Now Please. Grow Up.

Yes every one grow up > I have cause realising that THEY are not worth talking or making big deal about.

I read and re-read your post, and must admit, I understand very little of it. Are you saying that the sentence of a young student who is not a member of a "sex ring" or "Sex Tourism" should be lower than, say, an old priest who is a part of an internationl white slavery sex tourism ring?

The only thing I understood was that providing the judge with information that one may feel is pertitnant, while pleading guilty to a crime you may have commited, is cowardly in your eyes. That sentiment does not seem uncommon.

Give it up
Guilt Denial or what

Who is this addressed to?

Pay it no mind... 785 posts in just over a week... she's just posting to get her count up...

It was to roguetech.
n what are you sayin Im in guilt denial
I DONT THINK SO
Im the one thats been trying to educate eveyone about paedophiles..