EzraS wrote:
A) it would be libel, not slander. B) I didn't name any names. Certain people however chose to basically identify themselves as who I was referring to. Although I haven't confirmed any of those people are the ones I was talking about. As a side note, they have also "slandered" me, by name. My real name even.
If you defame people, they won't like you and they'll express so. It doesn't matter if your defamation reaches a threshold to hold you legally accountable, they're entitled to hold you personally accountable with social sanctions like no longer being friendly or giving you the benefit of the doubt when others make similar accusations, or telling others of their earlier interactions, etc.
If it makes you feel better, you don't have to like people who've defamed you either and are absolutely entitled to sanction them in the same ways; but you should probably stop hijacking the threads they post in to just complain about how they're just spam threads. The only spam is the spam you contribute to these threads.
Honestly, I'm a little ashamed of myself for insisting to goldfish21 that he shouldn't have called you childish, while I don't agree with his formula (considering even NTs mature at different rates and to different extents), I agree with him that you're acting like a child who wants attention from people who don't buy into his superiority complex.
What happened is that I said there are about 5 unnamed people who spam the same topic over and over.
And only about 5 people got personally offended and acted as a team trying to discredit me and play psyche games on me.