sony cowes to N. Korean madman's demand to can "interview"

Page 5 of 7 [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next


did sony set a bad precent by cowing to Kim?
yes they did, it gives more reason for others to do the same thing to anybody else :x 57%  57%  [ 16 ]
no, sony was backed into a corner and prudence ruled the day :| 21%  21%  [ 6 ]
meh, I don't give a rap :| 18%  18%  [ 5 ]
I'd rather eat a yummy ice cream :) 4%  4%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 28

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,555
Location: the island of defective toy santas

20 Dec 2014, 2:07 am

lily tomlin said it best, "I'd be a cynic, but I just can't keep up."



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,907
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

20 Dec 2014, 2:21 am

auntblabby wrote:
I would bet good money, that his is just the tip of the iceberg, there will be more such attacks. many more, the floodgates are open.

^this.


_________________
We won't go back.


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,555
Location: the island of defective toy santas

20 Dec 2014, 2:23 am

and looking down the road a ways, what this is leading to, is worldwide tyranny. the bad guys are going to ruin everybody else's freedom and bring the wrath of a worldwide dictator down on the rest of us.



trollcatman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,919

20 Dec 2014, 3:58 am

sonicallysensitive wrote:
I'll be slightly controversial here:

I don't think the 'right to free speech' equates to saying anything as/when and being able to brush it off by saying 'it's just a joke'.

Different cultures have different values; in today's world, there should be more cultural sensitivity.


I don't think we need to show a brutal regime like that of North Korea "cultural sensitivity". These people are oppressing and murdering their own people. So now there's a dent in the personality cult of the Dear Leader, oh noes!



sonicallysensitive
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 486

20 Dec 2014, 11:33 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Y'know, if I had had a choice in North Korea's actions, I much would have preferred that they had made the Sodomizing Lincoln than forcing Sony to cancel showing The Interview, as it would have just been an expression of free speech..
You're missing my point:

The right to free speech shouldn't be seen as a right to offend at will.

The Lincoln example was just an example: create any example that would be offensive to the US government i.e. 'Orgies at the NSA Chief of Staff Table' etc

Not every country worldwide (including my own) agrees that free speech equates to being able to say what you want when you want, with no worry of repercussions, or no sense of responsibility to what is being said/shown.


My issue is with the judgement, the mocking, and the ridicule of a living person - irrespective of who that person is, or what they have done.

Who are we to judge the actions of others?



If Sony decided to make a movie titled 'Spastic Salsa: Autism in South America', would you be OK with this, given the expression of free speech?



Sylkat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,425

20 Dec 2014, 11:47 am

They have just learned that this is how to get what they want.

It worked, they will do it again.

And again.

Dictator Chubby has just been given the power he has always wanted.


Woe is us.


_________________
Sylkat
Student Body President, Miskatonic University


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,435
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

20 Dec 2014, 12:10 pm

sonicallysensitive wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Y'know, if I had had a choice in North Korea's actions, I much would have preferred that they had made the Sodomizing Lincoln than forcing Sony to cancel showing The Interview, as it would have just been an expression of free speech..
You're missing my point:

The right to free speech shouldn't be seen as a right to offend at will.

The Lincoln example was just an example: create any example that would be offensive to the US government i.e. 'Orgies at the NSA Chief of Staff Table' etc

Not every country worldwide (including my own) agrees that free speech equates to being able to say what you want when you want, with no worry of repercussions, or no sense of responsibility to what is being said/shown.


My issue is with the judgement, the mocking, and the ridicule of a living person - irrespective of who that person is, or what they have done.

Who are we to judge the actions of others?



If Sony decided to make a movie titled 'Spastic Salsa: Autism in South America', would you be OK with this, given the expression of free speech?


To be sure, any and all freedoms must be tempered with responsibility. But I still think Kim's response was way over the top, and might even be interpreted as an act of war. It's best to counter offensive words and images with other words and images.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


sonicallysensitive
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 486

20 Dec 2014, 12:40 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
To be sure, any and all freedoms must be tempered with responsibility.
Quite



Kraichgauer wrote:
But I still think Kim's response was way over the top,
I agree, if the hack was from NK. Again, this depends on the evidence you choose to look at, and how it is framed.



Kraichgauer wrote:
and might even be interpreted as an act of war.
A hack of a corporation could be interpreted as an act of war?

The movie could be interpreted as an attack on a leader: is this an act of war?


Kraichgauer wrote:
It's best to counter offensive words and images with other words and images.
Maybe in your society - but not necessarily in every society.

Sony should be held responsible - and I personally feel they should offer an apology for the offence caused due to their lack of responsibility intending to release a movie intentionally written to mock the leader of a country (whether he is 'good' or not is a different matter entirely). The humility would be refreshing.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,555
Location: the island of defective toy santas

20 Dec 2014, 1:12 pm

sonicallysensitive wrote:
Sony should be held responsible - and I personally feel they should offer an apology for the offence caused due to their lack of responsibility intending to release a movie intentionally written to mock the leader of a country (whether he is 'good' or not is a different matter entirely). The humility would be refreshing.

why stop with sony? why not send all the producers, writers, actors and technicians who conceived and took part in the movie over to NK for Kim to have his way with? and all the venture capitalists who funded it? better yet, why not send any American who was in favor of watching the movie over to Kim also? what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. why don't all americans just surrender to Kim?



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,435
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

20 Dec 2014, 4:49 pm

sonicallysensitive wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
To be sure, any and all freedoms must be tempered with responsibility.
Quite



Kraichgauer wrote:
But I still think Kim's response was way over the top,
I agree, if the hack was from NK. Again, this depends on the evidence you choose to look at, and how it is framed.



Kraichgauer wrote:
and might even be interpreted as an act of war.
A hack of a corporation could be interpreted as an act of war?

The movie could be interpreted as an attack on a leader: is this an act of war?


Kraichgauer wrote:
It's best to counter offensive words and images with other words and images.
Maybe in your society - but not necessarily in every society.

Sony should be held responsible - and I personally feel they should offer an apology for the offence caused due to their lack of responsibility intending to release a movie intentionally written to mock the leader of a country (whether he is 'good' or not is a different matter entirely). The humility would be refreshing.


The hack in itself might not be so much an act of war, but the threats accompanying it - though hollow - might be viewed as deserving retaliation when the North Korean government's record for human rights abuses and aggressive military expansion are viewed alongside it.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


sonicallysensitive
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 486

20 Dec 2014, 5:45 pm

auntblabby wrote:
why stop with sony? why not send all the producers, writers, actors and technicians who conceived and took part in the movie over to NK for Kim to have his way with? and all the venture capitalists who funded it? better yet, why not send any American who was in favor of watching the movie over to Kim also? what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. why don't all americans just surrender to Kim?
'Surrendering to Kim' is quite a stretch from what was said.

But yes, you have a point: an apology from the entire team involved in the making of the movie would be more fitting.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

20 Dec 2014, 7:08 pm

sonicallysensitive
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 486

20 Dec 2014, 9:21 pm

Sony are probably embarrassed by how weak certain parts of their company's security was/is.

Any script kiddie with Metasploit could have achieved what was achieved.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,555
Location: the island of defective toy santas

20 Dec 2014, 9:25 pm

I wonder how furiously the other studios and such are upping their anti-malware game?



sonicallysensitive
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 486

20 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm

TLA-sourced?!

Better fiscally for Sony to be humiliated as cowards than to be confirmed as working in collusion with mass data collection agencies?

Smokescreen??



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,887
Location: Long Island, New York

21 Dec 2014, 5:23 am

It would not surprise me if this whole thing is unconventional marketing. They can now "heroically" release it and it will become a must see movie.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman