Donald Trump encourages hacking to find the Clinton emails

Post Reply New Topic

It was a joke and a mike check but that is the only thing you got right. The commies thought they might really be bombed in 5 minutes and put thier army on full alert.

Being anti political correctness does not mean a world leader should saying anything just because it is funny and it makes SJW's s**t thier pants. Since everything is seemingly offensive now people in are so desperate to not be watching thier every word they are not able to tell what is actually offensive or harmful anymore. This is one of the worst things the SJW's have done.

In Reagan's case it almost lead to all of most of us not bieng here. Probably Reagan did not know the mike was on. In Trump's case he knew damm well not only that the mike was on he knew what he said was going immediatly to the whole world.

Helping a foreign country harm the US is treason political correctness or not.

Changing the topic a bit Time magazine in todays edition is theorizing that the Russians are not necessarily trying to get Trump elected but hurt the US from within by undermining faith in the US electoral process. They said the Russians are caplable of hacking electronic voting machines to the point of having Trump win California and a few other states by 20 percent.

The Centers for Disease Control and The World Health Organization says there is no link. The evidence I have provided come from multiple well respected sources. Again vaccines do not cause autism.

Another possible trigger is antibiotics, my daughter's behavioural regression, repetitive behaviour and noise sensitivity can be neatly mapped to a bout influenza as a 3 yr old and getting antibiotics for the first time. Not a causal factor but a remarkable coincidence.

Do you believe your autism was caused by vaccines?

That study says possible. A specific subgroup of autism that's mediated via autoimmune response to viruses being sensitive to the measles virus/vaccine. The same way a very small number of people develop Guillain-Barre from the flu shot; they say don't worry about it, as you [most likely] won't get such; people do, though.

The ones CDC use also say possible with regressive autism and earlier exposure to vaccines, even if they didn't find any noteworthy difference in developing infantile autism. They also say biologically possible with infantile autism (again though, they didn't find any real differences in the populations that had it and didn't). They say "no link" because the population studies don't show any difference in their test groups; they don't use hundreds of thousands of people in their groups with a breakdown on each specific cause (science isn't good enough for each specific cause yet), though. If you use 50-100, it won't be sensitive enough for these rare causes.

The incidence of possible cases due to the measles vaccine would effectively be, "don't worry about it", and you wouldn't say not to have such if that was your worry compared to the complications of measles itself.

Saying definitely no, they don't/can't cause autism, is technically wrong.

(If I had a child that had a bad reaction to a vaccine and developed autistic symptoms or worsening of the same at the same time, it'd be very hard to overlook such as just being coincidental. Which would be what Trump means here.)

Highlights

• There was no relationship between vaccination and autism (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.06).
• There was no relationship between vaccination and ASD (autism spectrum disorder) (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.20).
• There was no relationship between [autism/ASD] and MMR (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.01).
• There was no relationship between [autism/ASD] and thimerosal (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.31).
• There was no relationship between [autism/ASD] and mercury (Hg) (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.07).
• Findings of this meta-analysis suggest that vaccinations are not associated with the development of autism or autism spectrum disorder.

Abstract

There has been enormous debate regarding the possibility of a link between childhood vaccinations and the subsequent development of autism. This has in recent times become a major public health issue with vaccine preventable diseases increasing in the community due to the fear of a ‘link’ between vaccinations and autism. We performed a meta-analysis to summarise available evidence from case-control and cohort studies on this topic (MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar up to April, 2014). Eligible studies assessed the relationship between vaccine administration and the subsequent development of autism or autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Two reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. Disagreement was resolved by consensus with another author. Five cohort studies involving 1,256,407 children, and five case-control studies involving 9,920 children were included in this analysis. The cohort data revealed no relationship between vaccination and autism (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.06) or ASD (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.20), nor was there a relationship between autism and MMR (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.01), or thimerosal (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.31), or mercury (Hg) (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.07). Similarly the case-control data found no evidence for increased risk of developing autism or ASD following MMR, Hg, or thimerosal exposure when grouped by condition (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.98; p = 0.02) or grouped by exposure type (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.95; p = 0.01). Findings of this meta-analysis suggest that vaccinations are not associated with the development of autism or autism spectrum disorder. Furthermore, the components of the vaccines (thimerosal or mercury) or multiple vaccines (MMR) are not associated with the development of autism or autism spectrum disorder.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns about vaccine safety have led some parents to decline recommended vaccination of their children, leading to the resurgence of diseases. Reassurance of vaccine safety remains critical for population health. This study systematically reviewed the literature on the safety of routine vaccines recommended for children in the United States.

METHODS: Data sources included PubMed, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices statements, package inserts, existing reviews, manufacturer information packets, and the 2011 Institute of Medicine consensus report on vaccine safety. We augmented the Institute of Medicine report with more recent studies and increased the scope to include more vaccines. Only studies that used active surveillance and had a control mechanism were included. Formulations not used in the United States were excluded. Adverse events and patient and vaccine characteristics were abstracted. Adverse event collection and reporting was evaluated by using the McHarm scale. We were unable to pool results. Strength of evidence was rated as high, moderate, low, or insufficient.

RESULTS: Of 20 478 titles identified, 67 were included. Strength of evidence was high for measles/mumps/rubella (MMR) vaccine and febrile seizures; the varicella vaccine was associated with complications in immunodeficient individuals. There is strong evidence that MMR vaccine is not associated with autism. There is moderate evidence that rotavirus vaccines are associated with intussusception. Limitations of the study include that the majority of studies did not investigate or identify risk factors for AEs; and the severity of AEs was inconsistently reported.

CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence that some vaccines are associated with serious AEs; however, these events are extremely rare and must be weighed against the protective benefits that vaccines provide.

Our findings may allay some patient, caregiver, and health care provider concerns. Strength of evidence is high that MMR vaccine is not associated with the onset of autism in children; this conclusion supports findings of all previous reviews on the topic.

Or... in plain English...

The real problem with this approach, is that you probably have more "Firsts" in the 0 to 5 age range, than in the 5 to 100 age range. So the chances of a spurious coincidence are exceptionally high simply due to the concentration of novel experiences in that age range.

Dillogic,

That link you just posted says there are no associations between vaccines and autism in two different places.