Gay couple left free to abuse boys

Post Reply New Topic

Yes... I'm sure you'll dispute that as well. Again, your right as a free thinker.

BTW, I've been reading some of your old posts on some of the other threads on WP. I've made two very interesting observations thus far:

1. You seem rather occupied by "homosexuals" and their infiltration of society. Any particular reason you're so obsessed? I can think of a few reasons. I've seen it before. Many times.

2. You threated some time ago to leave WP because you were "bored" with it. Why haven't you bothered to leave yet? Just curious?

1. Yes, I realize you've posted your reasons. I'm talking about the reasons that you HAVEN'T posted. You obviously have some unresolved issues regarding your sexuality. I've seen you mention it in posts that have absolutely nothing to do with sexuality. It's obviously on your mind quite a lot.

2. Darn... I joined up after you'd returned. I have a feeling it was a bit quieter and more pleasant without you.

3. I really don't think there's anything else you could tell me about yourself that I would bother caring about. You seem like a very unhappy person. That's too bad.

Again with the yawn... I've only seen it twice and it's already getting old. I can only imagine how many other times you've used it in the forums before your self-imposed exile.

1. Not a cheap trick. There have been many studies showing that repressed homosexuals tend to lash out in homophobic and violent ways. Maybe I'm wrong and you're as straight as possible. Not for me to say really. Just an opinion. Your virulent hate and odd obsession with the "gay agenda" and the way the homosexuals have infiltrated the government just seem at odds with someone who is assured of their sexuality. I don't doubt that you used to defend them.

2. I didn't say I found you interesting... I'm just bored right now and feel like having a discussion. I may tire of it, I may not.

3. If you're terribly unhappy, I'd suggest doing something about it. Medically, socially, etc. I used to miserable myself. I've been there and managed to change it around.

4. I am from America but I've also lived overseas for several years and consider myself fairly well educated. I wouldn't make sweeping generalizations about an entire population. That would be like me saying that all British people are boring and have bad teeth. Sure, there are some Brits with a smile that looks like they've chewed on rocks, but they don't all look that way. I'm far from loudmouthed, not imposing, but I am VERY self assured. I think everyone sure be self assured. You sound fairly loudmouthed yourself. Perhaps being anonymous on the internet has made you that way, maybe not.

I'm nowhere near 50, I'm far from fat, and today's hippies do nothing but piss me off.

Fart, Yawn its time for bed.

Wow, that's so immature. I know we all have ASDs on this site but that doesn't give us the right to be PIG IGNORANT. Don't worry new kid, we're not all that bad.

_________________
I have HFA, ADHD, OCD & Tourette syndrome. I love animals, especially my bunnies and hamster. I skate in a roller derby team (but I'll try not to bite )

I agree... I was in a mood that day as well so it just made it all the worse. I've discovered a few nice people on here so far so I'm glad that you responded. Oh, and happy day! You called me a kid!

The problem with letting gay men adopt boys is, statistically speaking, gay men are more likely to abuse boys than straight men married to females. Yes, more straight men abuse kids, but the percentage, per number who abuse kids is higher. I really, really wish that wasn't so! But that's reality.

The Catholic church did what certainly seemed, the compassionate tolerant, truly Christian thing (which is not to discriminate against ANY kind of sinner and we are ALL sinners). They let gay men be priests. After all, "celibacy is celibacy even if your thing is goats." I also believe that most of the young, pedophilic men who took their vows to abstain from all sex, including that with kids, sincerely thought a celibate life of service to God and Humanity would solve their problem. Alas it didn't. ( Their spirit was indeed willing but their flesh was just too weak. They should have heeded Matthew 18:5-9, not as punishment but as a the only treatment that absolutely guarantees they won't repeat offend. That of course goes for all pedophiles both gay and straight, and all rapists proven by DNA to be rapists.

Meanwhile the Boy Scouts took the unpolitically correct path and will not allow gay men to be scout leaders. They don't seem to have as much of a problem with molested kids. I could be wrong. it may be media bias. But one seldom hears of molesting scout troop leaders.

Of course, the Catholic church ought to lets it clergy marry, then let gay MARRIED men be priests and see if there is still a problem. I bet there will be much less of a problem!

But if in time, it turns out we find out from studies, that homosexual, male couples do molest more kids than straight couples, THEN, we must pass laws to protect the children, making it illegal for them to raise them or be in positions of power over them. The rights and needs of children to be safe must come first! Sometimes the disabled must accommodate the abled too. It must go both ways. For instance, I think Ray Charles is a wonderful singer. He would be welcome in my home. I would love to take him to dinner. Yes, he would be welcome in our church, would he ever! But there is no way I would let him drive a school bus. Because he's blind, and for all the political correctness of integrating the disabled into mainstream society and letting them become all they can become, the safety of children must be put above their individual rights to assimilate. There was at least one case of a blind lady wanting to become a teacher in a public school. They had to fire her. She could not discipline the children because she could not see what they were doing, and thus could not keep them safe and learning. It was sad, but the needs of the children had to come first.

The same with Helen Keller. I would not let her be a life guard! Blind people must not drive school bus's, deaf people probably should not be life guards and any one, ANY ONE with a suspicion of being a child molester must not be allowed around kids, PERIOD, gay or straight. That means many innocent folks will be denied the pleasures of child raising and nurturing. Yes, that's sad, but having damaged kids is much worse. When children are involved we must err on the side of caution. We just must.

Its the same with us Aspies. I have a problem with melt downs. I knew I could not be a good mother. (witnessing my own mothers deficiencies in that area convinced me). I delibertly chose at the age of two never to have kids, (yes two) and its a promise I have kept. I turned down five marrige proposals. I also won't have puppies either. I cant' stand their chewing my stuff up. I limit myself to older dogs.

Where are you getting your statistics? Can you show me where you've read that? That's one of the misconceptions out there in the general public. Using your logic, that more straight men abuse kids, we shouldn't allow any straight men adopt or be foster parents. See how that works?

Anyone should be able to adopt or foster a child in need as long as they are found to be a good candidate. Lumping all people into a category just doesn't work. There are waaay too many kids in need (including austistics and other children with special needs) that need help. Cutting out an entire category of people because of a misconception isn't right.

There are gay men who molest children, there are straight men who molest children, there are women who molest children, etc. If we followed the logic that we shouldn't allow anyone who would molest a child adopt or foster, there wouldn't be anyone left. Let the social workers and adoption workers make that determination.

Sorry if it seems like I'm harping here... I just get mad when sweeping generalizations are made about any group.