Baltimore: ALL Confederate Statues Have Now Been Removed
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,792
Location: Right over your left shoulder
So how exactly is the left responsible for enabling the right's racism? Pointing their racism out isn't enabling it. You seem to be dishonestly blaming those who care about and draw attention to racism for racism's existence, but that's about as honest as claiming bird-watchers are responsible for the birds showing up in spring.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,792
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Getting back on topic do you think public confederate monuments should be
1. Destroyed
2. Put in a museum
3. Kept in public but modified to acknowledge lost cause context
4. Other
Should public displays of confederate flags and such be banned as done in Europe?
What about Confederate stuff displayed on private property?
On the first question the trend is towered options 2 and 3 and I support that. One should not try to erase history by destroying the statues. Where we have been which is public displays without context has also erased history.
As far as questions 2 and 3 America is way more generous than most as far as allowing the freedom of expression of hate. This will not be changing anytime soon but with generational and demographic changes plus some horrific outrages I can envision a hate speech amendment being added to the constitution. I would hope this does not happen. These protections are not meant to protect the popular but the unpopular. I see these negative effects of hate speech bans.
1. Freedom of expression has exposed some people for who they are, we lose that if hate speech is banned
2. Once you ban the horrible it becomes easier and easier and easier to ban the less bad, to expand the definition of horrible.
3. Autistics should not want banning minority opinion that is viewed as bad by the majority.
4. While the confederate flag might be banned the metaphorical white flag will be waved. It would be a signal that we are too weak to fight evil ideas off. If that is the case no ban will really work in the long run.
If you start confiscating private property like it or not the will become the dominant issue, the ”conspiracy theorists” will be proven not to be such nut jobs after all.
I would prefer them to be removed from public display on public lands. I would accept them being removed to graveyards for those who died as a result of the war so long as accurate context is given. I would prefer that any lost cause dishonesty be removed from any plaques and replaced with factual information. I wouldn't have significant complaints if the majority of them were destroyed, but I wouldn't insist on it and I would be opposed to destroying all of them.
In any instances where the community's money paid for the memorial I'd be fine with melting them down.
In instances where private citizens or other entities paid for the monument I'd give them a reasonable time to collect their property and if they fail to recover it melt it down.
A small number of publicly funded ones might be kept to be displayed at a future date with updated text, basically making a point of preserving the ones with the most artistic merit.
Ultimately I really don't care what happens to them once they're out of the public's face.
I would oppose banning the ownership or display of the Confederate battle rag or other flags associated with the CSA. At the end of the day if horrible people wish to let everyone know they're horrible, all the power to them. I'm uncomfortable with the approach Germany has taken since it doesn't appear to have really done much to discourage white supremacists, they just have to make new symbols.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
So how exactly is the left responsible for enabling the right's racism? Pointing their racism out isn't enabling it. You seem to be dishonestly blaming those who care about and draw attention to racism for racism's existence, but that's about as honest as claiming bird-watchers are responsible for the birds showing up in spring.
It's a matter of a small segment of society being called everyone who is not left wing. There is a twofold hoped for effect in the left exploiting racism as a weapon. 1. Those who are not on the left being accused of being racist in order to stigmatize and ostracize them to the point where everyone is afraid to go against the left. 2. Convince everyone of color to only vote for left wing politicians.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,792
Location: Right over your left shoulder
So how exactly is the left responsible for enabling the right's racism? Pointing their racism out isn't enabling it. You seem to be dishonestly blaming those who care about and draw attention to racism for racism's existence, but that's about as honest as claiming bird-watchers are responsible for the birds showing up in spring.
It's a matter of a small segment of society being called everyone who is not left wing. There is a twofold hoped for effect in the left exploiting racism as a weapon. 1. Those who are not on the left being accused of being racist in order to stigmatize and ostracize them to the point where everyone is afraid to go against the left. 2. Convince everyone of color to only vote for left wing politicians.
The problem is that racism is more widespread then you're willing to admit. It isn't a small segment, it's a substantial portion of the conservative base (and a larger portion of folks on the far-right who fall outside of the conservative politics). One doesn't need to be a card carrying member of a white supremacist organization to consistently espouse views that are aligned with white supremacist/white nationalist talking points. Being offended that one has been described as racist doesn't mean they're not and throwing a hissy fit is a typical response of the 'I'm totally not a racist but...' crowd.
Blaming the left for the right's failure to appeal to a broader demographic isn't going to make anyone more likely to vote for Republicans. Michael Steele and other Republicans have commented on this, the party needs to stop the dog whistles and make a genuine effort. Instead with guys like Trump and Steve King they've chosen to go the other direction. They do a pretty good job of driving those voters away on their own.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
So how exactly is the left responsible for enabling the right's racism? Pointing their racism out isn't enabling it. You seem to be dishonestly blaming those who care about and draw attention to racism for racism's existence, but that's about as honest as claiming bird-watchers are responsible for the birds showing up in spring.
It's a matter of a small segment of society being called everyone who is not left wing. There is a twofold hoped for effect in the left exploiting racism as a weapon. 1. Those who are not on the left being accused of being racist in order to stigmatize and ostracize them to the point where everyone is afraid to go against the left. 2. Convince everyone of color to only vote for left wing politicians.
The problem is that racism is more widespread then you're willing to admit. It isn't a small segment, it's a substantial portion of the conservative base (and a larger portion of folks on the far-right who fall outside of the conservative politics). One doesn't need to be a card carrying member of a white supremacist organization to consistently espouse views that are aligned with white supremacist/white nationalist talking points. Being offended that one has been described as racist doesn't mean they're not and throwing a hissy fit is a typical response of the 'I'm totally not a racist but...' crowd.
Blaming the left for the right's failure to appeal to a broader demographic isn't going to make anyone more likely to vote for Republicans. Michael Steele and other Republicans have commented on this, the party needs to stop the dog whistles and make a genuine effort. Instead with guys like Trump and Steve King they've chosen to go the other direction. They do a pretty good job of driving those voters away on their own.
I stand by what I said. Racism is being used as a tool of political manipulation. And what is being done on the internet is augmenting, inflaming and perpetuating racism, rather than curtailing it. In my opinion exploiting racism and making it worse for political gain, is a horrible thing to do. Maybe there are those who get sucked into that without realizing it.
So how exactly is the left responsible for enabling the right's racism? Pointing their racism out isn't enabling it. You seem to be dishonestly blaming those who care about and draw attention to racism for racism's existence, but that's about as honest as claiming bird-watchers are responsible for the birds showing up in spring.
It's a matter of a small segment of society being called everyone who is not left wing. There is a twofold hoped for effect in the left exploiting racism as a weapon. 1. Those who are not on the left being accused of being racist in order to stigmatize and ostracize them to the point where everyone is afraid to go against the left. 2. Convince everyone of color to only vote for left wing politicians.
The problem is that racism is more widespread then you're willing to admit. It isn't a small segment, it's a substantial portion of the conservative base
Do you have any evidence to support those claims? Do you have a specific percentage in mind that would prove that it's "widespread?"
I grew up in the corn belt, and I know that racists exist, believe me. I've also been all over the Southern states and can tell you that I've met my fair share of racist as*holes. But I'm wondering how an African American candidate for president got elected to to two terms if racism is as widespread as you are claiming.
How many conservatives in the U.S. have you met and talked to? You see where I'm going with this? Where is the data for your claims? Last time I checked, you didn't live in this country.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
Facts and they way things are intended to be perceived are two different things needless to say.
The fact is that most people have racist and or bigoted feelings.
However those who are openly militant about it ie true White Supremacist and Neo-Nazis are a fringe segment of society. But it is clearly being made out that everyone who is not left-wing is a right-wing White Supremacist one way or another. And of course the way to give that the greatest impact is to keep racism at a boiling point.
I think probably there are those here who are so caught up in things, they don't realize what is going on. Or maybe they do and don't care as long as ends justifies the means.
Your right that it's BS. But your government leadership and your people still define themselves as "White Americans", that doesn't change if you stick your head in the sand.
The self-classification and fears of white America is a realm for psychologists
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... ca/307208/
Really...have you read the Turner diaries?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Turner_Diaries
It's the equivalent of the bible for every right winger, it's content is as dangerous as anything ISIS could come up with....probably even worse
White supremacist mass murderers Anders Braevik, Dylan Roof and Brendon Tarrant carried a copy
The bible for every right winger? I seriously doubt that. And your choice to deflect says a lot.
Sorry every extreme right winger (Kraftie already corrected me).....
That's not fair, some on the right merely enable and provide cover for racists.



Goes to show it's not actually taken seriously and is all just putting on a show like I said.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,792
Location: Right over your left shoulder
So how exactly is the left responsible for enabling the right's racism? Pointing their racism out isn't enabling it. You seem to be dishonestly blaming those who care about and draw attention to racism for racism's existence, but that's about as honest as claiming bird-watchers are responsible for the birds showing up in spring.
It's a matter of a small segment of society being called everyone who is not left wing. There is a twofold hoped for effect in the left exploiting racism as a weapon. 1. Those who are not on the left being accused of being racist in order to stigmatize and ostracize them to the point where everyone is afraid to go against the left. 2. Convince everyone of color to only vote for left wing politicians.
The problem is that racism is more widespread then you're willing to admit. It isn't a small segment, it's a substantial portion of the conservative base
Do you have any evidence to support those claims? Do you have a specific percentage in mind that would prove that it's "widespread?"
I grew up in the corn belt, and I know that racists exist, believe me. I've also been all over the Southern states and can tell you that I've met my fair share of racist as*holes. But I'm wondering how an African American candidate for president got elected to to two terms if racism is as widespread as you are claiming.
How many conservatives in the U.S. have you met and talked to? You see where I'm going with this? Where is the data for your claims? Last time I checked, you didn't live in this country.
I've spoken to significant numbers of American conservatives throughout my life. I've had customer service jobs where I dealt exclusively with American based customers. People loved to mention their political views, especially when Fox News was out again, or when we yet again stated we had no intention of carrying The Blaze.
The election of a black president isn't proof of a lack of racism in American society. Plenty of Americans voted against him, so this is a dishonest non-point to try to trot out.
Basically you're adopting the typical strategy of dismissing and invalidating claims because you don't personally share the experience. Ignoring other people's experiences doesn't make their experience change. As long as you choose to ignore these experiences your demands for proof will be little more than performance art.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
I find the in-depth extensive familiarity with every supremacist publication and website that exists, interesting.
Last edited by EzraS on 03 Dec 2019, 5:14 am, edited 1 time in total.