Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

Russian KGB Killed Kennedy

Page 6 of 8 [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

05 Nov 2017, 4:37 am

Has to be deep classifed. A number of documentaries involving ballistics experts have demonstrated that Oswald was behind Kennedy (in the book depository) which mean't it was almost impossible for him to have blown the front of JFKs head. Notice the position of the book depository to Kennedy's motorcade
http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/ne ... d615320956

This video shows the shot that blew Kennedy's head (sorry for the graphic imagery)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hom6WUE60Wk

It's fairly clear the bullet from this fatal shot came from the front of Kennedy - direct opposite of where Lee Harvey Oswald was positioned in the book depository



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

05 Nov 2017, 5:52 am

cyberdad wrote:
Has to be deep classifed. A number of documentaries involving ballistics experts have demonstrated that Oswald was behind Kennedy (in the book depository) which mean't it was almost impossible for him to have blown the front of JFKs head. Notice the position of the book depository to Kennedy's motorcade
http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/ne ... d615320956

This video shows the shot that blew Kennedy's head (sorry for the graphic imagery)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hom6WUE60Wk

It's fairly clear the bullet from this fatal shot came from the front of Kennedy - direct opposite of where Lee Harvey Oswald was positioned in the book depository


The exit wound would be larger than the entry wound. So if the front of the head had the most damage, that would mean the bullet came from behind creating a smaller wound and exited out the front leaving a much larger wound.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,634
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2017, 1:32 pm

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Has to be deep classifed. A number of documentaries involving ballistics experts have demonstrated that Oswald was behind Kennedy (in the book depository) which mean't it was almost impossible for him to have blown the front of JFKs head. Notice the position of the book depository to Kennedy's motorcade
http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/ne ... d615320956

This video shows the shot that blew Kennedy's head (sorry for the graphic imagery)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hom6WUE60Wk

It's fairly clear the bullet from this fatal shot came from the front of Kennedy - direct opposite of where Lee Harvey Oswald was positioned in the book depository


The exit wound would be larger than the entry wound. So if the front of the head had the most damage, that would mean the bullet came from behind creating a smaller wound and exited out the front leaving a much larger wound.


Unless the bullet ricocheted off the inside of his skull and exited from the side the bullet entered.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

05 Nov 2017, 2:28 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
CNN is fake news. It has been pouring out lies about wars for years. It's just the left wing version of FOX.


Examples, please.


Ugh, the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the US saying she had witnessed Iraqi soldiers dragging babies out of incubators and leaving them to die on the cold floor. Completely ignoring all the evidence against Israelis on 9/11, pushing the old man in a cave story, pushing the fake links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Fake stories about rape dungeons in Libya. Fake stories about Assad carrying out chemical weapons attacks. Ignoring the mass murder in Yemen. Israeli propaganda as they carpet bombed Gaza and Lebanon.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

05 Nov 2017, 2:31 pm

Just going back. Just because Russia might have wanted Trump to win, that doesn't make it evidence. If Hillary had've won, it wouldn't have meant the EU hacked the election. There's no evidence, it's just garbage because the Democrats can't accept the loss.

I've already put some decent stuff up regarding JFK, just completely ignored.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,634
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2017, 3:31 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
CNN is fake news. It has been pouring out lies about wars for years. It's just the left wing version of FOX.


Examples, please.


Ugh, the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the US saying she had witnessed Iraqi soldiers dragging babies out of incubators and leaving them to die on the cold floor. Completely ignoring all the evidence against Israelis on 9/11, pushing the old man in a cave story, pushing the fake links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Fake stories about rape dungeons in Libya. Fake stories about Assad carrying out chemical weapons attacks. Ignoring the mass murder in Yemen. Israeli propaganda as they carpet bombed Gaza and Lebanon.


As much as I'm chewing at the bit, I said I'd only talk about the Kennedy assassination on this thread from now on.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

05 Nov 2017, 6:16 pm

It's just because you are unable to counter anything I said.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

05 Nov 2017, 7:04 pm

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-osw ... story.html

Latest files find no CIA link, the article reports.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,634
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2017, 9:13 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
It's just because you are unable to counter anything I said.


I wouldn't bet on that. I have chosen to refrain from an argument that has nothing to do with the subject at hand - a thing of which I and many others have been guilty of.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

05 Nov 2017, 9:17 pm

Cause the CIA and mainstream media would be desperate to tell the truth :roll:


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

05 Nov 2017, 9:18 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
It's just because you are unable to counter anything I said.


I wouldn't bet on that. I have chosen to refrain from an argument that has nothing to do with the subject at hand - a thing of which I and many others have been guilty of.


I wouldn't bet on something so easy. You can PM me if you're interested or start another thread.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,634
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2017, 9:20 pm

B19 wrote:
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-oswald-cia-20171104-story.html

Latest files find no CIA link, the article reports.


I seriously doubt that the CIA of that time would have admitted any such connection. And even if he hadn't worked directly for the agency, there was always the possibility that he had been associated with the Anti-Castro radicals (such as David Ferrie and Guy Bannister in New Orleans) who had been sponsored by the CIA and organized crime without ever being regular CIA. That, and this new material actually contradicts the Warren Report, which stated Oswald had briefly been an informant for the bureau, but ended his relationship with them when he allegedly threatened to blow up their office for threatening to deport his wife.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

05 Nov 2017, 9:25 pm

The Warren Report was meant to look into whether Mosley or Rubenstein had links with organised crime, which they did. The 'report' found they didn't.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,634
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Nov 2017, 9:29 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
The Warren Report was meant to look into whether Mosley or Rubenstein had links with organised crime, which they did. The 'report' found they didn't.


Yes, the Warren report completely dismissed Ruby's ties to the mob, even though a senate committee not many years before in fact named him as an organized crime associate. I suspect they were denied access to Ruby's possible connection to gun running operations for the Anti-Castro underground in Dallas, which was sponsored by both the Mafia and the CIA.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

05 Nov 2017, 11:07 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Has to be deep classifed. A number of documentaries involving ballistics experts have demonstrated that Oswald was behind Kennedy (in the book depository) which mean't it was almost impossible for him to have blown the front of JFKs head. Notice the position of the book depository to Kennedy's motorcade
http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/ne ... d615320956

This video shows the shot that blew Kennedy's head (sorry for the graphic imagery)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hom6WUE60Wk

It's fairly clear the bullet from this fatal shot came from the front of Kennedy - direct opposite of where Lee Harvey Oswald was positioned in the book depository


The exit wound would be larger than the entry wound. So if the front of the head had the most damage, that would mean the bullet came from behind creating a smaller wound and exited out the front leaving a much larger wound.


Unless the bullet ricocheted off the inside of his skull and exited from the side the bullet entered.


The damage was actually more on the right side of the head, rather than the forehead or face. I remember one witness saying it looked like his ear exploded. So it seems like that could take place from a shot to the back or the front. It seems likely that Oswald fired the first two shots. The third and fatal one is pretty debatable.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

06 Nov 2017, 3:52 am

EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Has to be deep classifed. A number of documentaries involving ballistics experts have demonstrated that Oswald was behind Kennedy (in the book depository) which mean't it was almost impossible for him to have blown the front of JFKs head. Notice the position of the book depository to Kennedy's motorcade
http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/ne ... d615320956

This video shows the shot that blew Kennedy's head (sorry for the graphic imagery)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hom6WUE60Wk

It's fairly clear the bullet from this fatal shot came from the front of Kennedy - direct opposite of where Lee Harvey Oswald was positioned in the book depository


The exit wound would be larger than the entry wound. So if the front of the head had the most damage, that would mean the bullet came from behind creating a smaller wound and exited out the front leaving a much larger wound.

But how to explain JFK's head rocking back when the bullet entered? I'm not an expert in ballistics but that doesn't make physical sense?