TwilightPrincess wrote:
1. I didn’t say it shouldn’t be the goal. However, if achieving that goal would result in the deaths of thousands upon thousands of innocent people, the cons may, presently, outweigh the pros.
2. Once again, you are quick to call a position “dumb” without appearing to know much about it. That does not help your argument. You may want to read up on the topic more, with reputable sources like from the U.N., so you can understand the other side better even if, ultimately, you won’t agree with it.
They aren’t just attacking their terrorist neighbors. They are mostly attacking civilians.
3. No, Israel deserves a significant amount of blame, historically and currently. Hamas is evil, but that doesn’t mean that Israel is good.
1. That's your personal judgement. Israel seems to be okay with collateral damage if it means the terrorists who attack and murder them are dead and gone.
2. I have as much information as anyone else reading news headlines and am entitled to MY OPINION that it is dumb to expect Israel not to counter-attack hamas. Full stop, period. You're not obligated to agree with me but it's ridiculous to discount me as uninformed for having a different opinion than you. Knock it off, it's not a good look for you.
3. They've both been at each other for a long time. Such is the nature of enemies. Absurd to expect Israel to just accept terrorist attacks that murder their soldiers and babies & take a couple hundred hostages and then not retaliate with what might they can muster. Shame a bunch of civilians got caught up in their government's terrorist activities, but it is what it is and it's entirely reasonable for Israel to wipe hamas off the face of the earth given what's transpired.
_________________
No
![Heart :heart:](./images/smilies/icon_heart.gif)
for supporting trump. Because doing so is deplorable.