Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

What Drives Trump Crazy About the Mueller Investigation

Page 7 of 10 [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

08 Dec 2018, 4:41 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


When do you think he'll be indicted for that?



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

08 Dec 2018, 6:14 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


When do you think he'll be indicted for that?


As I'm insanely drunk, any time possible!! !!


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,674
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

08 Dec 2018, 6:17 am

Individual 1



Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,674
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

08 Dec 2018, 10:24 am

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2018/interactive_mueller-indictments-russia-cohen-manafort/

Mueller investigation has brought about 100 criminal charges so far



JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

08 Dec 2018, 11:19 am

kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Before Mueller became Trump's nightmare, he was singing Mueller's praises for being honest and a tower of integrity.


That's very true.

The Trump supporters were all whining about the Democrats investigating Trump thinking it was unfair. Then when Mueller's appointment was announced, they were cheering because of the belief that a Republican would just whitewash everything involving other Republicans. When Mueller proved himself to be the honest man that he is, they all started whining even worse.


Lol. Mueller honest haha. He's a shill.


Mueller's repuation is beyond reproach.

You're problem is that you want him to fail and so you feel you have to denigrate him.


Here he is LYING about WMD's



If it was based on the best available information, then it wasn't a lie.

Also, don't forget that there are reliable reports that the UN forces did, in fact, find about 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq. Why didn't Iraq allow the inspectors to access them?

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of the fault belongs to Iraq?


No it wasn't. It was a pack of lies and as head of the FBI Mueller knew he was lying. He then helped cover up the anthrax lies. He's a liar, a pathological liar.

Wrong. The US found them but they were not WMD's. Iraq would have used them if they were any good.

The blame goes partly to them in the 80's for attacking Iran on behalf of the US.


Iraq had used chemical weapons against citizens of Iraq. There was every reason to believe that they still had them, but their crazy leader wanted to appear like the regional strong man and wanted to be seen as putting something over on the US and other countries of the world and thumbing his noise at them.

The first Gulf War was entirely the fault of Iraq. What else did they expect when they invaded Kuwait? That the world would sit by and let them destabilize the entire region? And the second Gulf War came out of that.

It's really pathetic to try to blame the US for it.


Supplied by the US and then the US reaction to Saddam gassing the Kurds was to increase the support to Saddam. No there wasn't, the pushers of the war knew he didn't have any WMD's.

Lol. The US installed Saddam and supported him attacking Iran while supporting Iran too via proxy. The US didn't attack Iraq because of Kuwait, he just got a tap on the wrist for that. The US has done nothing but destabilise the region.

The second attack on Iraq came from a pack of lies via a bunch of psycho war mongers.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

08 Dec 2018, 11:21 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


kokopelli
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,399
Location: amid the sunlight and the dust and the wind

08 Dec 2018, 1:09 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Before Mueller became Trump's nightmare, he was singing Mueller's praises for being honest and a tower of integrity.


That's very true.

The Trump supporters were all whining about the Democrats investigating Trump thinking it was unfair. Then when Mueller's appointment was announced, they were cheering because of the belief that a Republican would just whitewash everything involving other Republicans. When Mueller proved himself to be the honest man that he is, they all started whining even worse.


Lol. Mueller honest haha. He's a shill.


Mueller's repuation is beyond reproach.

You're problem is that you want him to fail and so you feel you have to denigrate him.


Here he is LYING about WMD's



If it was based on the best available information, then it wasn't a lie.

Also, don't forget that there are reliable reports that the UN forces did, in fact, find about 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq. Why didn't Iraq allow the inspectors to access them?

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of the fault belongs to Iraq?


No it wasn't. It was a pack of lies and as head of the FBI Mueller knew he was lying. He then helped cover up the anthrax lies. He's a liar, a pathological liar.

Wrong. The US found them but they were not WMD's. Iraq would have used them if they were any good.

The blame goes partly to them in the 80's for attacking Iran on behalf of the US.


Iraq had used chemical weapons against citizens of Iraq. There was every reason to believe that they still had them, but their crazy leader wanted to appear like the regional strong man and wanted to be seen as putting something over on the US and other countries of the world and thumbing his noise at them.

The first Gulf War was entirely the fault of Iraq. What else did they expect when they invaded Kuwait? That the world would sit by and let them destabilize the entire region? And the second Gulf War came out of that.

It's really pathetic to try to blame the US for it.


Supplied by the US and then the US reaction to Saddam gassing the Kurds was to increase the support to Saddam. No there wasn't, the pushers of the war knew he didn't have any WMD's.

Lol. The US installed Saddam and supported him attacking Iran while supporting Iran too via proxy. The US didn't attack Iraq because of Kuwait, he just got a tap on the wrist for that. The US has done nothing but destabilise the region.

The second attack on Iraq came from a pack of lies via a bunch of psycho war mongers.


The US provided chemical weapons to Iraq? The First Gulf War was not about Iraq's invasion of Kuwait? The US was lying about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? The US increased support to Saddam after they gassed the Kurds?

That's nuts.



VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

08 Dec 2018, 1:31 pm

What I find nuts is that there are still Americans who believe that faulty intelligence that led to the second war in Iraq. There never was any credible proof that Iraq had WMDs. The 92 page declassified document that was released three years ago proves that.


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

08 Dec 2018, 1:39 pm

History lesson: When the United States looked the other way on chemical weapons


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

08 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm

Here's an opinion piece worth reading about the first war in Iraq with plenty of valid citations.


The First Iraq War Was Also Sold to the Public Based on a Pack of Lies


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

08 Dec 2018, 5:07 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

08 Dec 2018, 6:02 pm

kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Before Mueller became Trump's nightmare, he was singing Mueller's praises for being honest and a tower of integrity.


That's very true.

The Trump supporters were all whining about the Democrats investigating Trump thinking it was unfair. Then when Mueller's appointment was announced, they were cheering because of the belief that a Republican would just whitewash everything involving other Republicans. When Mueller proved himself to be the honest man that he is, they all started whining even worse.


Lol. Mueller honest haha. He's a shill.


Mueller's repuation is beyond reproach.

You're problem is that you want him to fail and so you feel you have to denigrate him.


Here he is LYING about WMD's



If it was based on the best available information, then it wasn't a lie.

Also, don't forget that there are reliable reports that the UN forces did, in fact, find about 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq. Why didn't Iraq allow the inspectors to access them?

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of the fault belongs to Iraq?


No it wasn't. It was a pack of lies and as head of the FBI Mueller knew he was lying. He then helped cover up the anthrax lies. He's a liar, a pathological liar.

Wrong. The US found them but they were not WMD's. Iraq would have used them if they were any good.

The blame goes partly to them in the 80's for attacking Iran on behalf of the US.


Iraq had used chemical weapons against citizens of Iraq. There was every reason to believe that they still had them, but their crazy leader wanted to appear like the regional strong man and wanted to be seen as putting something over on the US and other countries of the world and thumbing his noise at them.

The first Gulf War was entirely the fault of Iraq. What else did they expect when they invaded Kuwait? That the world would sit by and let them destabilize the entire region? And the second Gulf War came out of that.

It's really pathetic to try to blame the US for it.


Supplied by the US and then the US reaction to Saddam gassing the Kurds was to increase the support to Saddam. No there wasn't, the pushers of the war knew he didn't have any WMD's.

Lol. The US installed Saddam and supported him attacking Iran while supporting Iran too via proxy. The US didn't attack Iraq because of Kuwait, he just got a tap on the wrist for that. The US has done nothing but destabilise the region.

The second attack on Iraq came from a pack of lies via a bunch of psycho war mongers.


The US provided chemical weapons to Iraq? The First Gulf War was not about Iraq's invasion of Kuwait? The US was lying about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? The US increased support to Saddam after they gassed the Kurds?

That's nuts.


I know it's nuts. But it's all true.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

08 Dec 2018, 6:05 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

08 Dec 2018, 9:44 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

08 Dec 2018, 10:03 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?



Actually, I don't know why you wouldn't take it seriously. In over ten years that Wikileaks has existed, everything they've released has been proven to be 100% accurate. U.S courts have never been able to indict him for releasing false information. Liberals used to love him when he was exposing s**t on conservatives, but now they want him locked up because he exposed the Dems for the s**t they're doing. If it weren't so disgusting, it would be hysterical.


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

09 Dec 2018, 1:53 am

VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?



Actually, I don't know why you wouldn't take it seriously. In over ten years that Wikileaks has existed, everything they've released has been proven to be 100% accurate. U.S courts have never been able to indict him for releasing false information. Liberals used to love him when he was exposing s**t on conservatives, but now they want him locked up because he exposed the Dems for the s**t they're doing. If it weren't so disgusting, it would be hysterical.


In recent years, Assange has seemingly been bought and payed for by Putin, and thus is hardly the reliable source he supposedly was.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer