Persephone29 wrote:
There was nothing about making only $5,000, the year I began college that made me want to give up. I don't understand that. Being poor motivated me to never want to be poor again. So, I worked. And I stayed relatively poor (compared to your GOP analogy) for many years, although I was better off than before college. And my kids watched me work and now they work hard, even my son with Autism. He is a car detailer, he doesn't make much, but he works hard and lives on his own. And he loves his life!
Have you ever stopped and thought about whether the trajectory your life took and the steps you took have anything to do with small government? you seem to link GOP fantasies about no taxes and small government with your struggles and I honestly don't see a connection?
Human beings need self-motivation to feel they are part of a bigger social movement where they feel they can contribute, one of the aspects that attracted me to marxist philosophy as a teenager was the idea that you could cognitively transcend the idea of parochialism based on class, race or creed and think of humanity as one social movement. The rise of this movement was timed to coincide with the historic rise in class and racial equality.
The spirit of socialism has never faded despite attempts by conservative/capitalist right to equate social/civil rights with authoritarian communism (something your leaders successfully managed to hoodwink the American public in the 1950s...the US population are a little brainwashed so take a bit longer than everyone else).
More importantly this global social movement is what will help the autistic community and their families. The time when stigma and ignorance over mental illness will start to vanish.
I think the concern is that a big all powerful government will not be as benevolent as you are envisioning. That many aspects of life will fall under government regulation all in the guise of it being in the best interest and welfare of its citizens. That equality will end up meaning that most everyone is equally subordinate.