Ben_Shapiro wrote:
Well if you really wanted shoes and you couldnt afford them, then seems logical to take them from some one who no longer has any use for them. On the other hand it may have a victory trophy that the killer took in the same way as I keep the signature of all the people who have written maths tests and then I find an unsolvable question, so the killer can prove they did it.
I don't understand. Why do you keep their signatures again? And why would this man or woman "keep" their shoes? Do you think that the killer, he or she, would want to "prove" that they did it? To me, it honestly sounds like a pimp war. I've killed four of your street walkers and I've got the shoes to prove it! Is that what you mean? Sometimes, I think that the killer is a jealous wife who's wearing those shoes. Brrrr....I don't think I want to talk about this anymore