Is it just me, or is this a bit over the top?

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

southwestforests
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,138
Location: A little ways south of the river

24 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/e ... 832964.ece

Quote:
From The Times
September 14, 2009
Staff in carbon footprint trial face £100 fines for high emissions
Ben Webster, Environment Editor


Quote:
Those who exceed their ration pay a fine for every kilogram they emit over the limit. The money is deducted from their pay and the level of the fine is printed on payslips. Those who consume less than their ration are rewarded at the same rate per kilogram.
Related Links

Quote:
* Passengers face new tax to halt rise in air travel
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/e ... 826794.ece

* Storing CO2 could be Britain’s next boom industry
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/s ... 826737.ece


The maximum that an employee can earn or be fined has been capped at £100, but is likely to rise once staff have grown accustomed to the idea.

WSP, the global engineering consultancy, has been conducting the rationing scheme among 80 of its British employees for almost two years. In the first year the overall carbon footprint of participants fell by 10 per cent. The company is discussing its scheme with several FTSE 100 companies.

Three quarters of the employees were rewarded and a quarter, including Stuart McLachlan, the managing director, were fined. Mr McLachlan tried to cut his carbon footprint by buying a bike and cycling 12 miles to work from Richmond, Surrey, to Chancery Lane, in Central London. He also installed energy-saving lightbulbs, but he still exceeded his ration — and was fined £100 — because he flew to his holiday home in South Africa.


Not the main direction of my post, but;
Quote:
because he flew to his holiday home in South Africa.

Just how the bloody 'ell else do you propose he get there?
Yep, he should have cycled.


_________________
"Every time you don't follow your inner guidance,
you feel a loss of energy, loss of power, a sense of spiritual deadness."
- Shakti Gawain


Maggiedoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jun 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,126
Location: Maryland

24 Sep 2009, 1:26 pm

Yea, that is kinda crazy.. It's good to conserve, but it's not like you can stop doing everything..
How do they calculate that? He didn't like charter a private jet, did he? He just took a plane?? That doesn't make sense.



ViperaAspis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,083
Location: Portland, OR

24 Sep 2009, 2:31 pm

Agreed. Besides, why regulate at all. It's already too late. Environmental change is upon us.

There's no way we're going to stop doing everything. We'd be like primitives again. Living in agrarian societies at one with the land and nature. There is no need to do that. Over the next few millennia we will begin to adapt to more polluted air and waters via natural selection. Eventually someone will be born who can tolerate or even prefer the polluted environs and their descendants will inherit the Earth of the Future. This is the Way of Things.


_________________
Who am I? This guy! http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt97863.html


jamesongerbil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,001

24 Sep 2009, 5:23 pm

certainly over the top, considering we haven't even proved we caused global warming yet. considering it's impossible for us to prove at the mo'... what do they want, all industry to be stopped? way to kill the economy. glad i don't work there...



Coadunate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 640
Location: S. California

24 Sep 2009, 8:25 pm

I’m not from England but how about fining the company for having its office in central London instead having it in a residential area where most of its employees live? Like maybe 100 British pound per employee.