Study links mother's age to child's risk of autism
latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-sci-autism9-2010feb09,0,2274332.story
Study links mother's age to child's risk of autism
Moms over 40 are nearly twice as likely to have a child with autism, according to the analysis of California births. The study finds that in most cases, the father's age plays little role.
By Thomas H. Maugh II
February 9, 2010
Women who give birth after age 40 are nearly twice as likely to have a child with autism as those under 25, but it is unlikely that delayed parenthood plays a big role in the current autism epidemic, California researchers reported Monday.
The findings were expected to draw widespread attention because of the intense public interest in autism, but their true impact was expected to be simply in suggesting further avenues of research.
Surprisingly, the age of the father plays little role unless the mother is younger than 30 and the father is over 40, according to the analysis of all births in California in the 1990s.
The number of women over age 40 in California giving birth increased by 300% in the 1990s, while the diagnosis of autism increased by 600%. At first glance, it might seem that the rise in older pregnancies could be responsible for the rise in autism, which is now thought to affect as many as one child in every 100. But the authors, from UC Davis, calculate that older mothers account for less than 5% of the increase in autism diagnoses.
"There is a long history of blaming parents" for the development of autism, said senior author Dr. Irva Hertz-Picciotto, a professor of public health sciences and a researcher at the UC Davis MIND Institute who has been studying potential causes for the autism increase. "We're not saying this is the fault of mothers or fathers. We're just saying this is a correlation that will direct research in the future."
Researchers have long known that the age of the parents plays a role in a child's risk of developing autism, but how big a role and how that role varies with the sex of the parent has remained confusing, with contradictory results reported in different studies.
To investigate, Hertz-Picciotto, graduate student Janie E. Shelton and epidemiologist Daniel J. Tancredi of UC Davis analyzed all the singleton births in California during the 1990s for which information was available about the ages of both parents, a total of about 4.9 million births and 12,159 cases of autism.
Because of the large sample size, they were able to show how the risk was affected by each parent's age. They reported in the February issue of the journal Autism Research that women over 40 were 77% more likely to deliver an autistic child than those younger than 25 and 51% more likely than those age 25 to 29, independent of the age of the father.
For men over 40, there was a 59% increased risk of autism if the mother was younger than 30, but virtually no increased risk if the mother was over 30.
The researchers also calculated that the recent trend toward delayed childbearing contributed about a 4.6% increase in autism diagnoses over the decade.
"Five percent is probably indicating that there is something besides maternal age going on because we are seeing a rise in every age group of parents," Shelton said.
Also, noted Hertz-Picciotto, older women may be followed more closely during pregnancy, which would mean more ultrasounds -- which a few researchers have suggested might play a role in autism. Older women are more likely to suffer gestational diabetes and to develop autoimmune disorders, both of which have been linked to an increased risk of autism.
"We still have a real long way to go" in determining the causes of autism, she concluded.
It was only a couple of years ago that they published a study stating that males over the age of 35 showed an increased rate of children with autism so I do not know how much faith I would put in a study that says it has little effect. Just because males produce "new" seed regularly does not mean that it will always be top quality. There are age and environmental factors to consider.
And that is not even considering the idea that Autism seems to run strongly in families, across parental age groups or socio-economic groups. I believe that with proper funding they would likely find that Autism is not more prevalent in well educated or well to do families, as much as they are more likely to get their children diagnosed because of better resources.
mila_oblong
Blue Jay
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 86
Location: New Jersey, USA, Earth
Honestly, I heard about this and was pissed off. Pissed off because once again, they should be paying more attention to the genetics involved. Frankly, I always thought genetics were involved, along with environmental factors. I still do and this damn study ain't gonna change that, hell no!
Call me a dumb@ss, but something tells me that this was done more to get women to start having kids in their 20s, you know like that biological clock bullsh!t that the government(US) tried to stuff down our throats around 5 or 6 years ago. Then again, I'm probably still pissed off and letting off some more of that steam.
Oh that is not really bull s**t, our eggs do in fact degrade to varying degrees as we age. Not to mention that our bodies, depending on our fitness level, become less able to handle pregnancy. It is just a side effect of aging. The thing is, age is only one factor out of many, and chronological age is not the same as biological age. In other words people of the same "age" do not age at the same rate by virtue of having been around for the same length of time.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Study on Autism/ADHD Seeking Parents of children 6-12 |
23 Dec 2024, 9:17 pm |
Hello Friends! I need Parent Input For my Study <3 |
20 Dec 2024, 2:39 pm |
Seeking Autistic Volunteers for Doctoral Dissertation Study |
30 Oct 2024, 6:46 am |
Having Autism |
19 Dec 2024, 12:00 pm |