All right, so I've never worked closely with a child with severe autism. The slant of this news article just disgusted me, though.
Am I viewing it with my own slant? It seems to me that rather than focusing on the mother's very obvious, serious personal problems, it makes it look like her son was just too great a burden on her, too much stress. She was such a great mother, it was obviously her son's pitiable condition that was to blame for breaking her and making her kill him. <---sarcasm
His immune system was attacking his brain?? WTH??! Am I just not up on the latest lab results or something? (which I know I'm not, but jeez, that notion sounds stupid...)
Someone please tell me this is a badly-done humor column and I'm just not getting it....
_________________
"If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was not made for this world." (C.S. Lewis)