Page 1 of 1 [ 11 posts ] 

Claradoon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,964
Location: Canada

05 Jul 2010, 7:50 am

How come the Queen is visiting Canada and her representative in Canada (the Governor General) is touring China?



fermentedketchup
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 23 May 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 22
Location: Toronto Canada

05 Jul 2010, 8:02 am

Moreover, where was the Queen when PM Harper prorogued Canada's federal parliament twice? She wasn't doing photo ops with him, that's for sure! Oh well, Michaelle Jean was holding the fort, nothing to worry about.



Ambivalence
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,613
Location: Peterlee (for Industry)

05 Jul 2010, 8:35 am

Do you want to keep her? :)


_________________
No one has gone missing or died.

The year is still young.


phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

05 Jul 2010, 10:26 am

Meh... Go figure what goes on =.= Madame Michael Jean is likely in China because the Queen can't? =/ And for some reason, that's important?



Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

05 Jul 2010, 1:52 pm

Improving relations between nations is not usually a bad thing, but HRH in China might cause more problems than it solves. Thus a lower level personage sets the groundwork. One day HRH will get to go, and there will be happy smiles all round.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

05 Jul 2010, 3:56 pm

Well, the Queen is visiting Canada because the Prime Minister invited her. And the presence of the Queen meant that the Governor General was free to visit Expo 2010 for Canada Day rather than being at the celebrations in Ottawa. The Prime Minister needed to warm up the relationship with the PRC after his somewhat frosty performance during his first couple of years.

As for Harper's prorogations, that is something that the Queen would step into unless her Governor General deliberately chose not to act. As far as I am aware the only two constitutional acts that the Queen must still perform are the appointment of a Governor-general, and the approval of the summonning of extra senators under section 26 of the Constitution Act.


_________________
--James


Claradoon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,964
Location: Canada

05 Jul 2010, 6:24 pm

Ambivalence wrote:
Do you want to keep her? :)

I'll keep the Queen if she doesn't cost me anything. Also I really gotta stickk around to see King William - he's *so* Prince Arthur!

I don't know why Michele Jean the GG annoys me so much but she does. I want a hockey player for GG - they offered it to Jean Beliveau but he was sick (really) and turned it down. Did you know Frank Mahovlich is a senator? I want Don Cherry for GG - just watch him review the troops!



Claradoon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,964
Location: Canada

05 Jul 2010, 6:27 pm

visagrunt wrote:
Well, the Queen is visiting Canada because the Prime Minister invited her. And the presence of the Queen meant that the Governor General was free to visit Expo 2010 for Canada Day rather than being at the celebrations in Ottawa. The Prime Minister needed to warm up the relationship with the PRC after his somewhat frosty performance during his first couple of years.

As for Harper's prorogations, that is something that the Queen would step into unless her Governor General deliberately chose not to act. As far as I am aware the only two constitutional acts that the Queen must still perform are the appointment of a Governor-general, and the approval of the summonning of extra senators under section 26 of the Constitution Act.

Thank you! I was under the misapprehension that the GG should be chief host to the Queen on her visit. But you say the Queen's visit frees up the GG for other things - good to know, thanks.



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 116,976
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

05 Jul 2010, 10:57 pm

That's a little strange. They could have planned that, a little better.


_________________
The Family Enigma


visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

06 Jul 2010, 11:04 am

Au contraire, I think it gave us more bang for the buck. We had a huge amount of media coverage of the Royal Visit, and we got a huge profile in China for Canada Day. For all his shortcomings, I think the Prime Minister planned this one well.


_________________
--James


sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

06 Jul 2010, 1:02 pm

visagrunt wrote:
Au contraire, I think it gave us more bang for the buck. We had a huge amount of media coverage of the Royal Visit, and we got a huge profile in China for Canada Day. For all his shortcomings, I think the Prime Minister planned this one well.

The Queen's rep topic

ER and Philip are already on their way to the UN, at this moment in time. I would have thought that PM Harper would have chosen someone and that the ?Queen would be on hand, but maybe he needs more time?

I like Michele Jean, but Harper might prefer someone more in tune with his Cosnervative polices, though the GG is supposed to be above partisan politics, even if this is not necessarily the case.

The Queen always has a place in Canada. 8) William is ok. But NOT Charles. :roll:


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo