What disturbs me most is that this article is so forgiving of this woman who took her own son's life. The entire article seems to be suggesting that we sympathize with a person who committed murder, and that the action was justified by the difficulties created by the child's autism. The article says nearly nothing about the victim of this crime, except that he was autistic, as though that wipes away the possibility that he had friends, interests, or projects that enriched his life. Moreover, the crime was premeditated. At any point the child's mother could have turned him over to care by the state or a family member and gone into treatment for her depression. Instead, she engaged in a carefully organized execution of herself and her son.
Additionally, this article failed to mention anything about the possibility of improved services that could have helped save this mother and child's lives. Vast amounts of money are going into research into the causes of autism and the holy grail of a cure, while services for people with disabilities are underfunded across the board. These priorities are backwards. Articles like this reinforce this backwards thinking by portraying autism as a terrifying illness that justifies murder-suicide. It blames the difficulties the mother faced squarely on the child, and not on a lack of public understanding and reasonable services.
_________________
The problem isn't you.
-ck