Uh...what the heck???

Post Reply New Topic

http://windowintopalestine.blogspot.com ... ng-in.html

So WHY did they do this? Google it, youtube it, the story is there. Unless this is some sort of false rumour, WHY????

Is the US staying silent again? Western media does not report on these at all.

You should watch this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL8ANySuSuk

Then you will understand why the western media doesn't report these things.

Welcome to Pallywood.

Or the sequel, Pallywood II:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmgrboys ... re=related

What does this have anything to do with what I posted? Are you saying the bombing of a medical supply center is a lie?

It shows that staged news is common place in that part of the world and that what you think you see may not actually be the truth.

How do you know what caused that fire? How do you know that Israel had anything to do with it? How do you know that it was a medical supply building? All you actually know is that there was fire somewhere in Palestine. That's all.

Well, how do you know that news in favour of Israel is true? There was this famous clip called "Palestinians celebrateing 9/11" and many say that they were actually celebrating some other festival. How do you know that Palestinians are not demonized and that the media tries to label them "terrorists" as much as possible?

I don't. That's the whole point.

The Palestinians commonly use schools and hospitals to launch rockets and hide munitions. Ambulances often get used for terrorist activities too, which is why they are frequently banned from travel during curfews.

We are so caught up in our own prejudices that we seem prepared to accept that any reporting that does not coincide with our prejudices must, ipso facto be biased in favour of those we oppose.

Now, I don't discount the view that some reporting may exhibit the biases of the reporter, the editor or the publisher as the case may be--and I don't think that this is limited to any particular part of the political spectrum. There is as much bad journalism on the right as there is on the left.

But to suggest that there is an overriding bias that permeates the media is, I think, a step too far.

@ visagrunt

I actually don't make the statement of such a bias lightly, fact is that the overwhelming majority of the media has a far-left bias (I'm including the BBC, AP, and Reuters in this).

What is really sad is Rush Limbaugh was able to give some pretty good examples today of how the media is corrupt.

I'll see if I can dig up the examples and post them up.

Update: Found it.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/ ... guest.html

The president made that acceptance clear in a speech in May 2009. To some degree, he was forced into it by the Bush administration’s legacy of torture and abuse, which made some important cases impossible to prosecute. But the White House could have pushed harder to try some of these cases in the United States.

Last year, the administration essentially backed off its original fervor to try the mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, in New York City after encountering nearly unanimous opposition from the area’s Congressional delegation and Mayor Michael Bloomberg. (Most of those officials were Democrats, proving that groundless timidity is bipartisan.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/opini ... &src=twrhp

Classic blame Bush.

RUSH: The New York Times -- (laughing) -- I mean the whole paper today. "Rising Gas Cost Finds the Nation Better Prepared." (laughing) Yes. "The increase in energy prices is beginning to resemble the rise in 2008. But this time, the American economy may be better prepared for higher fuel costs. ... While the latest surge in energy prices is likely to cause some pain and slow the recovery from the recession, economists say the spike is unlikely to derail the rebound unless prices rise a lot further. One big reason is that consumers and businesses have learned lessons from the last oil shock. ... Industries like airlines and trucking, which are most severely affected by fuel prices, have passed on their higher costs almost immediately instead of waiting for the price increases to hammer profits. And much of the rest of the United States economy is far less dependent on oil than it used to be." (laughing) It's not possible, but that's what they're saying.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/ ... guest.html

Referring to:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/busin ... ss&emc=rss

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/ ... guest.html

referring to:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/41969508/
and
http://content.usatoday.com/communities ... g-states/1