EU attempting to ban cars in European cities by 2050

Page 1 of 2 [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

29 Mar 2011, 12:46 am

PatrickNeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,136
Location: Scotland

29 Mar 2011, 1:27 am

Whilst this is good for air pollution it is more or less a carbon tax. I hate that our focus is on emissions when the real issues with climate lie with replanting vegetation and restoring soil quality.


_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here> ;)


John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

29 Mar 2011, 1:50 am

Another reason to be glad to be an American! Image


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


MotherKnowsBest
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,196

29 Mar 2011, 2:51 am

That's not actually true. They want to move away from conventional cars and the reliance on petrol and diesel. You can see this already in London as councils invest in electric car charging points. And cities are already taking steps to reduce the number of cars themselves, nothing to do with the EU, everything to do with congestion and public health.



Simonono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,299

29 Mar 2011, 9:13 am

Yes!! I've always hated those stupid cars.



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

29 Mar 2011, 9:28 am

Well, I'd just ban cars altogether, so be happy you don't live in my dictatorship :lol:


_________________
Not currently a moderator


PatrickNeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,136
Location: Scotland

29 Mar 2011, 12:24 pm

MotherKnowsBest wrote:
That's not actually true. They want to move away from conventional cars and the reliance on petrol and diesel. You can see this already in London as councils invest in electric car charging points. And cities are already taking steps to reduce the number of cars themselves, nothing to do with the EU, everything to do with congestion and public health.


Mother Knows Best lol


_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here> ;)


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

29 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm

MotherKnowsBest wrote:
That's not actually true. They want to move away from conventional cars and the reliance on petrol and diesel. You can see this already in London as councils invest in electric car charging points. And cities are already taking steps to reduce the number of cars themselves, nothing to do with the EU, everything to do with congestion and public health.


:roll:

You just proved my point, and quite frankly it is another reason I am glad to be an American.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

29 Mar 2011, 2:02 pm

MotherKnowsBest wrote:
That's not actually true. They want to move away from conventional cars and the reliance on petrol and diesel. You can see this already in London as councils invest in electric car charging points. And cities are already taking steps to reduce the number of cars themselves, nothing to do with the EU, everything to do with congestion and public health.
One word: Incrementalism.



JeremyNJ1984
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 9 Oct 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 496
Location: Central New Jersey

29 Mar 2011, 2:18 pm

We also need to take into account the fact the EU is not the same as the United States...yes it sounds dumb and obvious, but people don't really dwell on the realistic geographical differences between both units...A country such as the UK is compact, has roads not devised for motor traffic originally, and is not spread out, like the United States...Im not sure the demographics, but I live near New York City...the vast majority of people who spend the day in Manhattan don't actually LIVE in manhattan...they commute, from New jersey, PA, CT, Long Island. Cars are an intergral part of the U.S economy...suburbs are where the vast majority of people live. We are also a country that is spread out and reaches two oceans. The car was invented for all practical purposes in the U.S and its part of our DNA as a nation...we take pride in road trips, excursions on weekends, visiting different parts of the country. Trains like in Europe are nice, but we dont have extended vacations for a month here, so it would be impractical to take a 3-4 train ride cross country from New York to L.A...Its just not practical in large countries, for short, imo.



MotherKnowsBest
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,196

29 Mar 2011, 3:15 pm

Exactly. Spend 16 hours on the M6 travelling 150km or half your life on the North Circular trying to get to Ikea and then see how you feel about this.

I used to live in a small town just outside London. My place of work was 15 minutes from home as the crow flies. Often it would take me 3 or 4 hours to drive between the 2. One time I left work at 3 and didn't get home till after 11. No disaster, crash or anything, just sheer weight of traffic.



JeremyNJ1984
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 9 Oct 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 496
Location: Central New Jersey

29 Mar 2011, 3:21 pm

MotherKnowsBest wrote:
Exactly. Spend 16 hours on the M6 travelling 150km or half your life on the North Circular trying to get to Ikea and then see how you feel about this.

I used to live in a small town just outside London. My place of work was 15 minutes from home as the crow flies. Often it would take me 3 or 4 hours to drive between the 2. One time I left work at 3 and didn't get home till after 11. No disaster, crash or anything, just sheer weight of traffic.


Of course when London was being built up into a major city it was during an era when cars were not even a dream yet of inventors. American cities have by and large grown up around cities in the past half century...cities are constructed with this in mind. In the 1950s, a man named Robert Moses tore through New York City and built the cross bronx expressway and many other highways that have allowed new york city to thrive as an economic engine. I dont know if their are plans on doing that in major European capitals.



MotherKnowsBest
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,196

29 Mar 2011, 3:27 pm

Not that I'm aware of. We're quite attached to our Roman and medieval road systems. We want our governments to deal with the problem by getting rid of all the other cars except ours.



richie
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jan 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 30,142
Location: Lake Whoop-Dee-Doo, Pennsylvania

30 Mar 2011, 4:52 pm

JeremyNJ1984 wrote:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
Exactly. Spend 16 hours on the M6 travelling 150km or half your life on the North Circular trying to get to Ikea and then see how you feel about this.

I used to live in a small town just outside London. My place of work was 15 minutes from home as the crow flies. Often it would take me 3 or 4 hours to drive between the 2. One time I left work at 3 and didn't get home till after 11. No disaster, crash or anything, just sheer weight of traffic.


Of course when London was being built up into a major city it was during an era when cars were not even a dream yet of inventors. American cities have by and large grown up around cities in the past half century...cities are constructed with this in mind. In the 1950s, a man named Robert Moses tore through New York City and built the cross bronx expressway and many other highways that have allowed new york city to thrive as an economic engine. I dont know if their are plans on doing that in major European capitals.

Robert Moses built the Long Island Sate Parkway system in such a way to eliminate buses and mass transit. On Long Island being without a car is second class citizenship.
What makes New York City an economic engine is its harbor and sub way system. NYC relied more on rails and traffic by sea than by cars and trucks.


_________________
Life! Liberty!...and Perseveration!!.....
Weiner's Law of Libraries: There are no answers, only cross references.....
My Blog: http://richiesroom.wordpress.com/


Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

30 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm

Rome banished wagons and chariots during the day. Goods were delivered at night, and the people had the streets for the day. Traffic is an old problem.

2040, a ban on gas and diesel might be quaint, as oil fields are drying up now.

Long range thinking says this will not last, but we still have to move people and goods.

What was proposed was not banning personal transportation, just gas and diesel, something that is powered by WiFi Hotspots would work.

The American way is huge vehicles, one person, sitting in traffic. LA was designed by the oil companies, a million SUVs going nowhere, burning fuel.

With names like "Yukon", "Tundra", Americans are ready to head to the North Pole, if they could get out of the gridlock. If they could find fuel, and if they could afford it.

Driving is killing the economy. Imported oil, building and maintaining roads, design for car owners only, and overall cost of $1 a mile, times millions, day and night.

Localized economy employs more people in local markets, and customers who walk or bike are in better health for it.

Planning for a world without gas and diesel makes sense. Some American cities have walking only zones, a Mexican tourist town has parking on the outskirts, walking only in the main old town. People survive these harsh measures, even if they have a right to drive their pick me up truck everywhere.

Driving while eating a burger and talking on the phone in a huge vehicle the Army would not want is a social problem, and the forklift needed to get the driver out, who has a BMI of 2. Americans now weight enough for 2.

Through time most people never went more than ten miles from where they were born. They could walk there in the morning, and walk back home by night. Somehow they survived.

It is the cheapest, healthiest, and most secure.

If the Maddi Army overthrows the Bey of Tripoli, there will not be a shoe leather shortage in the Shire.



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

30 Mar 2011, 7:07 pm

Inventor wrote:
Rome banished wagons and chariots during the day. Goods were delivered at night, and the people had the streets for the day. Traffic is an old problem.

2040, a ban on gas and diesel might be quaint, as oil fields are drying up now.

Long range thinking says this will not last, but we still have to move people and goods.

What was proposed was not banning personal transportation, just gas and diesel, something that is powered by WiFi Hotspots would work.

The American way is huge vehicles, one person, sitting in traffic. LA was designed by the oil companies, a million SUVs going nowhere, burning fuel.

With names like "Yukon", "Tundra", Americans are ready to head to the North Pole, if they could get out of the gridlock. If they could find fuel, and if they could afford it.

Driving is killing the economy. Imported oil, building and maintaining roads, design for car owners only, and overall cost of $1 a mile, times millions, day and night.

Localized economy employs more people in local markets, and customers who walk or bike are in better health for it.

Planning for a world without gas and diesel makes sense. Some American cities have walking only zones, a Mexican tourist town has parking on the outskirts, walking only in the main old town. People survive these harsh measures, even if they have a right to drive their pick me up truck everywhere.

Driving while eating a burger and talking on the phone in a huge vehicle the Army would not want is a social problem, and the forklift needed to get the driver out, who has a BMI of 2. Americans now weight enough for 2.

Through time most people never went more than ten miles from where they were born. They could walk there in the morning, and walk back home by night. Somehow they survived.

It is the cheapest, healthiest, and most secure.

If the Maddi Army overthrows the Bey of Tripoli, there will not be a shoe leather shortage in the Shire.


Moog likes this.


_________________
Not currently a moderator