Inuyasha wrote:
Artros wrote:
I found it an interesting story. I honestly feel that it was unavoidable at some point and simply a matter of time. I hope this is a wake-up call for the US government. Tax rises and spending cuts are unavoidable, and maybe now both parties will see that they have to stop behaving like children if they want to keep the US economy on track.
I would go for the spending cuts first, because the Democrats have a poor track record when it comes to following through with cutting spending (unless it is screwing over the troops).
What we need is a balanced budget Constitutional Amendment.
Taxes need to be raised at some point. Cutting spending is important but there's no reason why revenues shouldn't be allowed to increase. The negative effects of raising taxes are overestimated.
Also, I'd like to remind you that Clinton managed to balance the budget after raising the debt ceiling. It's two costly wars, a bailout and a tax reduction later that any semblance of balance is gone.
A balanced budget amendment would not necessarily be a good thing. You need to be able to do some anticyclical investment in recessions. The problem is that government all across the world have failed time and time again to implement cuts during booms.
_________________
"Be slow to fall into friendship; but when thou art in, continue firm and constant. " -Socrates
AQ: 40/50
EQ: 17/50
SQ: 72/80 (Extreme Synthesiser)
Aspie test: about 150/200 Aspie, about 40/200 NT