Page 1 of 3 [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

06 Aug 2011, 8:36 am

S&P credit rating decreases from Triple A to Double A. Is the worst yet to come?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

06 Aug 2011, 8:39 am

Do you see the Four Horsemen yet?

Image

^ Like These Blokes? ^



Artros
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 646
Location: The Netherlands

06 Aug 2011, 8:45 am

I found it an interesting story. I honestly feel that it was unavoidable at some point and simply a matter of time. I hope this is a wake-up call for the US government. Tax rises and spending cuts are unavoidable, and maybe now both parties will see that they have to stop behaving like children if they want to keep the US economy on track.


_________________
"Be slow to fall into friendship; but when thou art in, continue firm and constant. " -Socrates
AQ: 40/50
EQ: 17/50
SQ: 72/80 (Extreme Synthesiser)
Aspie test: about 150/200 Aspie, about 40/200 NT


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

06 Aug 2011, 8:51 am

Fnord wrote:
Do you see the Four Horsemen yet?

Image

^ Like These Blokes? ^


I worry about higher interest rates and the government spending too much on it and increasing the debt in order to offset it. That type of thing.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

06 Aug 2011, 11:55 am

Artros wrote:
I found it an interesting story. I honestly feel that it was unavoidable at some point and simply a matter of time. I hope this is a wake-up call for the US government. Tax rises and spending cuts are unavoidable, and maybe now both parties will see that they have to stop behaving like children if they want to keep the US economy on track.


I would go for the spending cuts first, because the Democrats have a poor track record when it comes to following through with cutting spending (unless it is screwing over the troops).

What we need is a balanced budget Constitutional Amendment.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,011
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

06 Aug 2011, 1:25 pm

Good our economy will have to collapse for things to improve because of how f*cked up the system is.



AspieWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 657
Location: Out of my mind. Back in 10 minutes.

06 Aug 2011, 1:47 pm

I can't believe that they didn't lower it years ago and a lot more! The US government is a both unconstitutional and massively corrupt, and it has been for decades.


_________________
"A man needs a little madness...or else...he never dares cut the rope and be free."
Nikos Kazantzakis, ZORBA THE GREEK

Some of us just have a little more madness than others!


Artros
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 646
Location: The Netherlands

06 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Artros wrote:
I found it an interesting story. I honestly feel that it was unavoidable at some point and simply a matter of time. I hope this is a wake-up call for the US government. Tax rises and spending cuts are unavoidable, and maybe now both parties will see that they have to stop behaving like children if they want to keep the US economy on track.


I would go for the spending cuts first, because the Democrats have a poor track record when it comes to following through with cutting spending (unless it is screwing over the troops).

What we need is a balanced budget Constitutional Amendment.


Taxes need to be raised at some point. Cutting spending is important but there's no reason why revenues shouldn't be allowed to increase. The negative effects of raising taxes are overestimated.

Also, I'd like to remind you that Clinton managed to balance the budget after raising the debt ceiling. It's two costly wars, a bailout and a tax reduction later that any semblance of balance is gone.

A balanced budget amendment would not necessarily be a good thing. You need to be able to do some anticyclical investment in recessions. The problem is that government all across the world have failed time and time again to implement cuts during booms.


_________________
"Be slow to fall into friendship; but when thou art in, continue firm and constant. " -Socrates
AQ: 40/50
EQ: 17/50
SQ: 72/80 (Extreme Synthesiser)
Aspie test: about 150/200 Aspie, about 40/200 NT


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,533
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

06 Aug 2011, 1:56 pm

We've been watching the DOW now take a good hit, the question is, will congress now follow up on all of these measures and even try to cut more. As for the tax issue its sticky, obviously the loopholes need to be closed as first matter of course.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


Tom_Kakes
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 342

06 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm

Strange that its just one rating organization taking this view. Most probably something to do with the republicans. Obama knows the vultures are circling.

:(



Artros
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 646
Location: The Netherlands

06 Aug 2011, 3:22 pm

Tom_Kakes wrote:
Strange that its just one rating organization taking this view. Most probably something to do with the republicans. Obama knows the vultures are circling.

:(


I'm pretty sure others will follow.


_________________
"Be slow to fall into friendship; but when thou art in, continue firm and constant. " -Socrates
AQ: 40/50
EQ: 17/50
SQ: 72/80 (Extreme Synthesiser)
Aspie test: about 150/200 Aspie, about 40/200 NT


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

06 Aug 2011, 4:50 pm

Tom_Kakes wrote:
Strange that its just one rating organization taking this view. Most probably something to do with the republicans. Obama knows the vultures are circling.

:(


I was wondering about that! Can the world bank lower the rating? What happens if it does? Is that the one that matters the most?



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,533
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

06 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm

S&P was pretty clear - at least in one article - that their lowering was because they believed that the current budget cuts were too shallow to correct the problem and that the republicans were to blame for not allowing taxes to be raised. Two ways to look at that - it could be the republican's fault for not conceding to a halfway point, it could be the democrats fault for the republicans having a plan that works in whole but not in pieces and only letting them have the whole thing.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


psychohist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,623
Location: Somerville, MA, USA

06 Aug 2011, 9:00 pm

Artros wrote:
Taxes need to be raised at some point. Cutting spending is important but there's no reason why revenues shouldn't be allowed to increase. The negative effects of raising taxes are overestimated.

While I'd be happy with removing tax credits and many deductions, raising taxes is not the only way to raise revenue. Right now, the biggest thing holding federal revenues back is not the tax rate, but the weakness of the economy. Reversing some of the policies that keep the economy weak should be the first order of business.

That said, we should also keep in mind that AA+ is still a pretty darn good credit rating.



jojobean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,341
Location: In Georgia sipping a virgin pina' colada while the rest of the world is drunk

06 Aug 2011, 10:05 pm

psychohist wrote:
Artros wrote:
Taxes need to be raised at some point. Cutting spending is important but there's no reason why revenues shouldn't be allowed to increase. The negative effects of raising taxes are overestimated.

While I'd be happy with removing tax credits and many deductions, raising taxes is not the only way to raise revenue. Right now, the biggest thing holding federal revenues back is not the tax rate, but the weakness of the economy. Reversing some of the policies that keep the economy weak should be the first order of business.

That said, we should also keep in mind that AA+ is still a pretty darn good credit rating.


I read on verizion news that 1500 millionares dont pay ANY income taxes, However I have to pay 545.oo in a combination of state and federal and I make less that 25,000 a year. that's just f**ked up.


_________________
All art is a kind of confession, more or less oblique. All artists, if they are to survive, are forced, at last, to tell the whole story; to vomit the anguish up.
-James Baldwin


psychohist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,623
Location: Somerville, MA, USA

06 Aug 2011, 10:11 pm

jojobean wrote:
I read on verizion news that 1500 millionares dont pay ANY income taxes, However I have to pay 545.oo in a combination of state and federal and I make less that 25,000 a year. that's just f**ked up.

Exactly. That's why it's the tax credits and deductions that need to be targeted. Raising the percentage rate on people who actually report and pay taxes on $1,000,000 of taxable income, as Obama suggests, will still leave those 1500 millionaires paying no taxes at all.

And maybe if we close the loopholes, we can afford to cut the rate that people like you have to pay. Something simpler and fairer would be better for the economy than the current byzantine system, where there's often more benefit to spending time finding tax breaks than there is to spending that time on something productive that actually helps the economy.