cave_canem wrote:
I'll play devil's advocate here...
Sounds to me like the mother had reached the end of her proverbial rope. She's 68 and her son is 43. This is purely conjecture, but I imagine that she took care of her severely disabled son for 43 years and is at her wit's end and cannot cope. Maybe she cannot afford to have him cared for, and so the burden rests with her. And yes, 43 years of dealing with a severely disabled child would be a burden... especially now that she's 68. She may need care of her own.
This does not make her actions "right" but I wouldn't be so quick to say that they were so "wrong" that she is deserving of death herself.
I think it is very easy to judge the actions of others. But without knowing the full story, it is difficult to put her actions into context.
This may not be the case in this situation, it just sounds plain nasty to me, but certainly with a lot of cases with parents of disabled children either allowing them to die or actively trying to kill them, we should be focusing less on the wrong of the parents and more on a society that sees families with disabled children left to get on with it without adequate support. It's of course right to think such people are wrong, but it's best not to get blinded by emotions over the situation and think about how that situation came to be.
_________________
Bloodheart
Good-looking girls break hearts, and goodhearted girls mend them.