Neanderthal DNA suggests humans rarely, if ever, interbred

Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

hyperbolic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,869

16 Nov 2006, 1:32 am

To add to the spate of neanderthal topics...

http://tinyurl.com/y8wukd

Neanderthals shared %99.95 percent of our DNA, according to the article. The article also called the Neanderthal in question a "man". Is that typical in the media now? Chimpanzees share 95% of human DNA. Should they be called men and women too?

Quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Researchers have sequenced DNA from the leg bone of a Neanderthal man who died 38,000 years ago and said on Wednesday it shows the Neanderthals are truly distant relatives of modern humans who interbred rarely, if at all, with our own immediate ancestors.



Seigneur
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 234
Location: Maryland

16 Nov 2006, 6:02 am

By 'man' I they probably don't mean anything more than 'male'.



hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

16 Nov 2006, 6:18 am

Humans can't interbreed with other hominoids.



krex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Age: 60
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 4,471
Location: Minnesota

16 Nov 2006, 7:20 am

"neandertals rarely breed with humans...",sounds a lot like aspies,according to many of the males
on this forum. :lol:


_________________
Just because one plane is flying out of formation, doesn't mean the formation is on course....R.D.Lang

Visit my wool sculpture blog
http://eyesoftime.blogspot.com/


lol
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 25
Location: Le Grand Guignol

16 Nov 2006, 7:26 am

I know I read a similar article, and it made the point that humans from the same period as neanderthals shared about as much DNA in common with modern humans, as did modern humans and neandorthals (so it's not quite comparable.) I'll dig it up when I'm back home.



CanyonWind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,656
Location: West of the Great Divide

16 Nov 2006, 10:53 am

hale_bopp wrote:
Humans can't interbreed with other hominoids.




Uhh, the last non-human hominid died about 28 thousand years ago, so I'm not sure where you got your data. That's if you're saying neanderthals can't be considered human.

Here's an interesting article about how neanderthals lived their day to day lives:

http://www.britarch.ac.uk/BA/ba51/ba51feat.html

"Despite the physical toughness of their lives, it appears that Neanderthals had a strong sense of community - they cared for members of the group who were injured or infirm. Recent study of the tissues of the original Neanderthal's forearm, for example, shows that it had broken and remained unusable for decades, much reducing his ability to contribute to society. At Shanidar cave in Iraq, one male had a crushed right leg, ankle and foot, a blow to the skull that had probably blinded him in one eye and a right arm that was severed above the elbow. His injuries had healed; he remained part of the group."

If that ain't human, I don't know what is.


I'm trying to imagine a scenario where two groups of humans could live in the same place for thousands of years and there were no instances of people from the two groups having sex.


_________________
They murdered boys in Mississippi. They shot Medgar in the back.
Did you say that wasn't proper? Did you march out on the track?
You were quiet, just like mice. And now you say that we're not nice.
Well thank you buddy for your advice...
-Malvina


lol
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 25
Location: Le Grand Guignol

21 Nov 2006, 11:07 pm

I'm sorry I forgot about this.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/11 ... index.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6099422.stm

Not the same article as I'd mentioned, but they do support the interbreeding theory.