Zokk wrote:
I lived in Texas for thirteen years, and got to know the general mentality of the people quite well. Yes, they're generally friendly, but they have a very no-nonsense attitude about crime and punishment. You commit a crime, you better be ready for what's coming to you if you're caught and convicted.
Plus, it's far more expensive to house an inmate for life than it is to give them the death penalty; two possible sentences for the same severity of the crime, usually. Life-long inmates also live quite comfortably, all things considered. State-funded medical care and meals and all that. Would you really want your tax dollars used feed and house a murderer for the rest of their life in conditions far better than most low-income demographics will ever know?
Yes, Texans seem friendly, but unforgiving.
I see things differently. Most violent criminals are sociopaths. That is a mental illness. Some people don't consider personality disorders mental illness, but I do. I think we should keep them in jail and feed them because it's the right thing to do. Don't get me wrong, I'd much rather spend the money curing cancer, or saving old growth forest. But what we are doing not killing them, is living up to our standard of human rights. Creating a more compassionate civilization, instead of lionizing revenge and retribution.
The money we use to house murderers is just a drop in the bucket compared to say, our military spending anyway. There's better ways of saving taxpayer money than killing people.