cyberdad wrote:
The College has to back one of their members if they are facing potential litigation.
They most certainly do not--this is a professional licensing body, not a trade union. If a dentist is in breach of the rules of professional conduct, the college would come down on him like a ton of bricks.
Quote:
The underlying issue is that the girl needs dental treatment but concurrently she is unable to cope with having a drill inside her mouth. There are jaw braces that can lever a person's jaw open and if the girl can be strapped in. However if the issue is she would be emotionally disturbed by the procedure then the father should probably search for a dentist who has done this procedure without anesthesia then seek to get a local dentist who would be willing to attempt the same on his daughter.
The use of jaw braces and restraints is, in my view, barbaric. It is psychologically traumatic to the patient, and potentially dangerous to the dentist or hygienist. While sedation is not an ideal mode of delivery, it is vastly preferable to restraints for all parties.
I expect that the parents have been through the mill with many dentists before Dr. Choi. I imagine that they are turning to the BCHRT because there simply are no other dentists who are even willing to try to treat her without sedation.
_________________
--James