Page 1 of 2 [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

MSBKyle
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 339
Location: Kent, Ohio

16 Oct 2014, 8:57 pm

I live in Northeast Ohio, just 2 cities away from where Amber Vinson, the 2nd nurse with Ebola, stayed last weekend. Everyone in my area is freaking out about it. My aunt drove by the house where the woman stayed last weekend and she said that it is covered in yellow tape with police and media surrounding it. It is pretty cool when worldwide news is happening less than 10 miles from your house, but it is also scary because that means that Ebola is close by. I think that this is all part of a plan by the government to wipe out the population. They know how to prevent it from coming to the country, but have failed to do so.



cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

16 Oct 2014, 9:14 pm

i highly doubt there will ever be more than a few isolated cases of ebola in the US. i have an MD. as i always tell my husband when he goes on a paranoid binge: when you hear the word conspiracy, think delusion.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

16 Oct 2014, 9:17 pm

I don't think Ebola is a conspiracy, but I do think we should all be at least a little concerned about it.



Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

16 Oct 2014, 9:34 pm

"A major outbreak of Ebola in the US and elsewhere in the West is unlikely given the strong health systems, the World Health Organization (WHO) says."

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29640470



MjrMajorMajor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,763

16 Oct 2014, 9:39 pm

It would be frightening if it could be spread airborne, or transmitted before symptoms develop. I don't know what that nurse was thinking to fly commercial cross country, though. The same with Nancy Schneiderman.. the level of disregard and denial of protocol makes me thankful that it isn't that easily transmitted. It does seem an ominous precursor for what could be in a different situation. :?



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,579
Location: the island of defective toy santas

16 Oct 2014, 9:52 pm

I have no faith that America is ready for it.



cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

16 Oct 2014, 10:34 pm

i'd bet any amount up to all i own that there will be no ebola pandemic in the US.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,579
Location: the island of defective toy santas

16 Oct 2014, 10:39 pm

I sure hope you're right. but are we any better prepared than we were a century ago during the 1918 flu pandemic? the news coming out of texas is not reassuring in this respect.



Aspinator
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2008
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,413
Location: AspinatorLand

17 Oct 2014, 5:12 am

For some reason, this reminds me of when I was in grade school and we would have drills and hide under our desks in case Russia attacked the US with nuclear weapons. We see how silly that is today that covering our heads with our hands and gettting under our desks would not protect someone from radiation. I feel the same type of silliness revolves around the Ebola virus. It is not airborne and can only be contacted by close proximity to bodily fluids such as blood, etc. In the 3rd world there is a tendency to re-use needles for cost saving measures. There is a reason the nurses came down with it as they were in close proximity to patient's blood, and such.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,603
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 6:27 pm

auntblabby wrote:
I sure hope you're right. but are we any better prepared than we were a century ago during the 1918 flu pandemic? the news coming out of texas is not reassuring in this respect.


I think we probably are. Back in 1918, nobody was prepared for a killer flu bug, because no one expected it, and back then the medical science was hardly what it is today.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,603
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 6:28 pm

auntblabby wrote:
I sure hope you're right. but are we any better prepared than we were a century ago during the 1918 flu pandemic? the news coming out of texas is not reassuring in this respect.


I think we probably are. Back in 1918, nobody was prepared for a killer flu bug, because no one expected it, and back then the medical science was hardly what it is today.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,579
Location: the island of defective toy santas

18 Oct 2014, 8:17 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I sure hope you're right. but are we any better prepared than we were a century ago during the 1918 flu pandemic? the news coming out of texas is not reassuring in this respect.


I think we probably are. Back in 1918, nobody was prepared for a killer flu bug, because no one expected it, and back then the medical science was hardly what it is today.

al I know is that the hospital I worked in was caught flat-footed when somebody came through with TB.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,603
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 11:15 pm

auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I sure hope you're right. but are we any better prepared than we were a century ago during the 1918 flu pandemic? the news coming out of texas is not reassuring in this respect.


I think we probably are. Back in 1918, nobody was prepared for a killer flu bug, because no one expected it, and back then the medical science was hardly what it is today.

al I know is that the hospital I worked in was caught flat-footed when somebody came through with TB.


I'm sure that's often the case, till something they're unprepared for happens, then they'll get their act together and get prepared. Case in point, that hospital in Texas that proved to be woefully prepared for Ebola, but next time will probably be ready.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,579
Location: the island of defective toy santas

18 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I sure hope you're right. but are we any better prepared than we were a century ago during the 1918 flu pandemic? the news coming out of texas is not reassuring in this respect.


I think we probably are. Back in 1918, nobody was prepared for a killer flu bug, because no one expected it, and back then the medical science was hardly what it is today.

al I know is that the hospital I worked in was caught flat-footed when somebody came through with TB.


I'm sure that's often the case, till something they're unprepared for happens, then they'll get their act together and get prepared. Case in point, that hospital in Texas that proved to be woefully prepared for Ebola, but next time will probably be ready.

they'd better be readier, or else there will be hell to pay.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,603
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 11:28 pm

auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
I sure hope you're right. but are we any better prepared than we were a century ago during the 1918 flu pandemic? the news coming out of texas is not reassuring in this respect.


I think we probably are. Back in 1918, nobody was prepared for a killer flu bug, because no one expected it, and back then the medical science was hardly what it is today.

al I know is that the hospital I worked in was caught flat-footed when somebody came through with TB.


I'm sure that's often the case, till something they're unprepared for happens, then they'll get their act together and get prepared. Case in point, that hospital in Texas that proved to be woefully prepared for Ebola, but next time will probably be ready.

they'd better be readier, or else there will be hell to pay.


I'm sure.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


DeuceKaboose
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2014
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 141
Location: United States

19 Oct 2014, 6:49 pm

Aspinator wrote:
For some reason, this reminds me of when I was in grade school and we would have drills and hide under our desks in case Russia attacked the US with nuclear weapons. We see how silly that is today that covering our heads with our hands and gettting under our desks would not protect someone from radiation. I feel the same type of silliness revolves around the Ebola virus. It is not airborne and can only be contacted by close proximity to bodily fluids such as blood, etc. In the 3rd world there is a tendency to re-use needles for cost saving measures. There is a reason the nurses came down with it as they were in close proximity to patient's blood, and such.


Except the USSR Did have hundreds of extremely dangerous nuclear weapons, and the likelihood of the USSR nuking the US during the cold war is most certainly a lot more likely than a extreme ebola outbreak