"All questions, whether friendly or hostile, would be answered in the same way. Often before the question was finished he'd open his mouth and release a data-stream of statistics, tax rates, comparisons, dates, proportions, percentages, age ranges and things so far removed from the question you could only assume he was hiding something. Or even everything. On and on his answers went, unpunctuated by wit, humour, light, shade, or indeed punctuation. His refusal to recognise the right of his questioners to exist was something clinicians recognised."
Answers will be give a grade from A to F according to how much they approach the truth.