Forbes writes an clickbait article against an autistic group
http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillin ... ic-people/
Imagine your a white yuppie liberal writer for Forbes from San Francisco. You drive your hybrid to Starbucks and notice another yuppie complaining about a black hate group.
You check out this Facebook page and write an article full of righteous indignation. You write how this hate group uses the words "Black" and "hate" in the article...but don't link the group in question.
You find the group in question as well as the counter group trying to take this group down.
You go onto the group and find out the group is black owned and the sites name is "Black People Against Hate"
Clickbait right?
Forbes recently wrote about a Facebook group owned by autistic people called "Autisic families against shooters"
Basically NTs are claiming it's a hate group against autistic people but yet it's run by autistic people and there is not autistic hate anywhere on there. Talk about an NT over reaction
Basically NTs are claiming it's a hate group against autistic people but yet it's run by autistic people and there is not autistic hate anywhere on there. Talk about an NT over reaction
The Facebook group is called 'Families united against autistic shooters'.
It's sarcasm. The group is making fun of autistic people by suggesting 'autistic shooters' are common.
Basically NTs are claiming it's a hate group against autistic people but yet it's run by autistic people and there is not autistic hate anywhere on there. Talk about an NT over reaction
The Facebook group is called 'Families united against autistic shooters'.
It's sarcasm. The group is making fun of autistic people by suggesting 'autistic shooters' are common.
So it IS a hate group against autistics after all?
Basically NTs are claiming it's a hate group against autistic people but yet it's run by autistic people and there is not autistic hate anywhere on there. Talk about an NT over reaction
The Facebook group is called 'Families united against autistic shooters'.
It's sarcasm. The group is making fun of autistic people by suggesting 'autistic shooters' are common.
Okay I see what your saying at this point we are getting conflicting information. Where are all the posts with pictures showing what's happening. The side saying and accusing isn't showing any pictures.
But it looks like we are indeed being trolled one way or another.
The journalist in his article is not posting anything from what I see showing what's being said that's the offending content
Sweetleaf
Veteran

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,029
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Considering the author of the Forbes post is Emily Willingham, who has a history of writing about Autistic advocacy issues, I'd say you need to slow your roll on this one, Shadow. The original group she wrote about was called, "Families Against Autistic Shooters." Your overreaction is to the counter group that was set up in response to the original page.
Before it was taken down, I saw the Facebook group in question. It was highly offensive. I bet Emily didn't post pictures of the page because it would need a heavy Trigger Warning for Autistics. Also, why give that heinous voice any ounce of respectability by showing it, even in screencap form?
In one of her comment replies, Willingham added:
But the onus is on Facebook to moderate it appropriately, rationally, and swiftly, in this instance and in future instances, and that’s the ultimate message of this post. You can irrationally mock the idea of autistic people as a stigmatized, marginalized group if you like and be angry about “neurodiverse cult movements,” but the fact remains that autism is considered a disability under federal law, and Facebook would do well to take note of that.
I, for one, am glad that it's been taken down. It clearly violated the Facebook community standards for hate speech. Heck, it had Autism Kills in its URL.
The only thing that can be seen as "clickbait" or "trolling" here would be a hastily concocted thread based upon a sliver of information available to the reader.
_________________
The Autistic Pickle is typed in front of a live studio audience.
No ghosts were harmed in the making of this post.
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,883
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Being that Forbes is a business magazine, I would think it would at least have a conservative slant.
I wouldn't count on it. Just because a company or publication may be fiscally conservative doesn't mean that it can't be socially liberal.
_________________
When everyone is losing their heads except you, maybe you don't understand the situation.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Autistic Parent Support Group |
26 Jan 2025, 10:19 pm |
The ProPublica ABA article |
28 Jan 2025, 11:16 am |
What an Ableist article looks like |
19 Mar 2025, 2:21 pm |
The Group Home |
02 Feb 2025, 1:01 am |