http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/04/me ... -bail.html
Aside from the problems with the methods and everything, I find this to be very problematic:
Quote:
The prosecutors' office for years fought the release of the DNA evidence and Williams has pointed to Hardin's confession before a parole board as evidence of his guilt. Hardin's attorneys and family dismiss the admission as a desperate man hoping to appease the board and get out of prison for a crime he didn't commit.
Problems:
1.) The DNA evidence was sealed to begin with.
2.) Parole board testimony is used against what very well could be an innocent man, putting innocent prisoners in a damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-don't situation.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
04 Aug 2016, 2:01 pm
