Here's one, for the "weird thing they found at the bottom of the lake" category.
Weevlos and his affiliates have outspoken biases against Jews and the autistic.
His preference against the theory of general relativity was very likely shaped by his prejudice against Einstein.
This being said, controversial research papers were apparently scrubbed from the internet, in a way that you can verify, for yourself.
"A most curious case of censorship in a quest for honest science"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH7zOX5PrVwIn my experience, there are countless, politically-incorrect, scientific observations, if you gain access or cross the paywall.
While they control the use of language, for public consumption, they have an entirely-different set of beliefs, even down to the fundamental basis of reality.
Many of these discussions, such as what Weevlos is talking about, can be found in out-of-print books, from the Romantic Era. Are the results repeatable. Can you see it, for yourself. Has some vaunted, scientific doctrine ever resulted in a useful machine or invention. Is it good ol' boys and pixiedust.
The worst offenders in this regard are journals which are censoring work on climate modeling and climate thermodynamics. Any article that does not toe the line on Human Caused Global Warming will have a hard time being published. There is now a regime of neo-Lysenkoism in the climate related sciences and technologies....
If a worker even critically questions the validity of the climate sensitivity models currently approved of by the IPCC, that person is immediately branded a Denialist. Scientific Progress is measured by the success of denialists. Starting with physicists who denied caloric and aether and chemists who denied phlogiston..
03 Sep 2016, 9:33 am
