cyberdad wrote:
I actually think a fat tax has been debated in Australia as a way of reducing obesity rates...what might be more constructive is a tax on sugar and fat rich foods
I was remembering "Dot and the Kangaroo", last night. When we're talking about sugar and fat and food, my mind draws an association, with those men characters, dressed in old-fashioned working clothes -- working to raise the food.
In the mentality of those times, food was "nutritious", when it kept you from wasting. We would call it fattening.
Quit subsidizing it, and most Westerners would become scrawny. Quit cooking it for people, like in the convenient, frozen boxes. Most of us would go hungry, if all the raw ingredients were delivered to our door steps, free of charge, and all we had to do is prepare it.
There is something incredibly-redundant, in a bureaucracy, paying people to grow the food, importing labor at public expense, then penalizing production, penalizing the customer. There seems to be several steps, that could be removed.
Except, the only purpose, in this futile discussion, is to cultivate a bureaucracy, not to empower the individual.
Authoritarians are required to jail fat people, and accept petitions for doing so, and to run the whole Rube Goldberg device, which is production.
Last edited by friedmacguffins on 02 Jul 2017, 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.