Trump Tax Plan Likely Incentivizes Globalization

Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

06 May 2018, 8:47 pm



It looks like Trump is just another neocon.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

07 May 2018, 2:21 am

This guy is a terrible reporter, possibly a propagandist.

1. These specific tax changes were supposedly about "repatriation of money", incentivizing companies to move foreign earned money back to the US. (Just search Google "Trump repatriation").
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ta ... eas-2017-9

2. So, the guy starts off wrong. This was never about "stopping companies from moving their profits overseas". Again, it was supposedly the opposite, it's about incentivizing "repatriation of foreign earned money" (bringing foreign earned money back to the US).

3. This guy's premise is wrong. There was never a "disincentive rhetorical push". Again, it was the opposite, it was supposedly about incentivizing "repatriation of foreign earned money".

4. The guy doesn't even both to explain GILTI and FDII.

GILTI : "Generally, income that is Effectively Connected Income, Foreign Base Company Income, or income that is taxed at a rate that is more than 18.9% will not be GILTI".
https://www.withum.com/kc/what-the-fdii ... an-to-you/

So, yes, it appears Congress wrote GILTI to exclude directly connected foreign subsidiaries from getting the preferential repatriation taxation treatment. That's what this guy is seeing.

He doesn't understand the larger picture because he's simply pointing to a few sentences and making a sweeping conclusion off those sentences.

These tax accountants explain how if you have directly-connected subsidiaries then you may need to look at this and possibly restructure your subsidiaries to get the preferential tax treatment. Looks like simply changing a subsidiary to a "C-Corp" would overcome the exclusion.


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


NoClearMind53
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 25 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 369

10 May 2018, 7:34 am

Just call it outsourcing from now on. The right doesn't give a rats ass about shipping jobs overseas anyways. They've been too stupid to notice for years. To them "globalization" is now a (((conspiracy))) to import brown people to take their jeeeeeerbs and end the "white race".