Judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against The New York Times
Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ]
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1390b/1390bfdce73636f9b999b108ddd97ba2f65b9007" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,814
Location: Long Island, New York
Quote:
A New York judge dismissed Donald Trump's 2021 lawsuit against The New York Times on Wednesday and ordered the former president to pay attorneys’ fees for the paper and three of its journalists who are listed as defendants.
In his ruling Wednesday, Justice Robert R. Reed of the state Supreme Court in New York County said Trump's claims against the Times and three of its journalists for their Pulitzer-winning series on his undisclosed finances in 2018 "fail as a matter of constitutional law." (Supreme Court is the name of New York's top trial court.)
"Courts have long recognized that reporters are entitled to engage in legal and ordinary newsgathering activities without fear of tort liability — as these actions are at the very core of protected First Amendment activity,” Reed wrote.
Reed, a Democrat, also ordered that Trump pay the paper and its journalists’ attorneys’ fees, legal expenses and costs.
Reed's ruling comes as a defeat for Trump, who filed the $100 million lawsuit in 2021 against the Times, his estranged niece Mary Trump and others. The lawsuit alleged Mary Trump and three journalists from the paper — Susanne Craig, David Barstow and Russell Buettner — “engaged in an insidious plot to obtain confidential and highly-sensitive records which they exploited for their own benefit and utilized as a means of falsely legitimizing their publicized works.”
Trump’s lawyers argued that the Times had played a role in “tortious interference” with a contract, knowingly breaching his contractual rights with his niece from a 2001 settlement agreement that bound her to confidentiality and nondisclosure of certain records.
Citing precedent in New York courts, Reed dismissed the tortious interference claim “because The Times defendants’ purpose in reporting on a newsworthy story constitutes justification as a matter of law." He further argued that the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press to report on newsworthy subjects guards against such claims.
While Wednesday’s ruling dismisses the claims against the Times and its journalists, a ruling has not yet been rendered about Mary Trump, who has also filed a motion to dismiss.
In his ruling Wednesday, Justice Robert R. Reed of the state Supreme Court in New York County said Trump's claims against the Times and three of its journalists for their Pulitzer-winning series on his undisclosed finances in 2018 "fail as a matter of constitutional law." (Supreme Court is the name of New York's top trial court.)
"Courts have long recognized that reporters are entitled to engage in legal and ordinary newsgathering activities without fear of tort liability — as these actions are at the very core of protected First Amendment activity,” Reed wrote.
Reed, a Democrat, also ordered that Trump pay the paper and its journalists’ attorneys’ fees, legal expenses and costs.
Reed's ruling comes as a defeat for Trump, who filed the $100 million lawsuit in 2021 against the Times, his estranged niece Mary Trump and others. The lawsuit alleged Mary Trump and three journalists from the paper — Susanne Craig, David Barstow and Russell Buettner — “engaged in an insidious plot to obtain confidential and highly-sensitive records which they exploited for their own benefit and utilized as a means of falsely legitimizing their publicized works.”
Trump’s lawyers argued that the Times had played a role in “tortious interference” with a contract, knowingly breaching his contractual rights with his niece from a 2001 settlement agreement that bound her to confidentiality and nondisclosure of certain records.
Citing precedent in New York courts, Reed dismissed the tortious interference claim “because The Times defendants’ purpose in reporting on a newsworthy story constitutes justification as a matter of law." He further argued that the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press to report on newsworthy subjects guards against such claims.
While Wednesday’s ruling dismisses the claims against the Times and its journalists, a ruling has not yet been rendered about Mary Trump, who has also filed a motion to dismiss.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ]
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Judge gives go-ahead for Trump administration to gut USAID |
21 Feb 2025, 8:22 pm |
Judge blocks Trump from terminating DEI-related grants |
21 Feb 2025, 8:17 pm |
Have you been involved in a lawsuit? |
19 Feb 2025, 8:18 pm |
Jay-Z accused in a civil lawsuit of raping a 13-year-old |
08 Dec 2024, 11:14 pm |