Tim_Tex wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
If its just a map on the wall of an office over some character's shoulder, why cant they just put one of those pixelized blur blobs over it (dont know what its called)? Like when you see a vid taken on a public street and the faces of the private citizens are blocked out to hide their identities...or you see a naked person on TV and their offending body parts are blurred out.
Who knows ...maybe the map figures prominently in some dialogue scene.
But yeah...Malaysia may follow suit because the map would step on their territorial toes too. And the Sultan of Brunei may also ban the movie too.
Poor Barbie.
Brunei practices Sharia law, so it probably would have been banned there anyway.
True. They would be "offended" for reasons you would expect. Women with uncovered faces, and like that. Not for an unexpected reason...like a map on the wall.
I remember the letters to the editor part of Discover magazine I was reading filled with folks offended by a map printed in an article the previous month that showed Kashmir as totally part of Pakistan (or totally part of India- I forget which) rather than as split between the two countries by the ceasefire line through it. The editor apologized for their 'overworked art director' who didnt mean to take sides between the two countries.
So a map can be just as obscene as bare skin!
Being a map geek I once noticed that a map of East Asia on a general's wall in an episode of the TV show MASH was an anachronism. The show is set in the early Fifties Korean War, but the guy's map did not show French Indochina, and instead showed the post colonial nations of Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam, that replaced French Indochina when the French were booted out of Indochina in 1954 (after the Korean War). Not offended of course. Just an amusing gotcha.