The Savonoski Crater: The Mysterious, Perfectly Round Hole

Post Reply New Topic

Full Title:
The Savonoski Crater: The Mysterious, Perfectly Round Hole In Alaska That Scientists Can't Explain

https://www.newsbreak.com/share/3823354302644-savonoski-crater-the-mysterious-perfectly-round-hole-in-alaska-that-scientists-can-t-explain?_f=app_share&s=a3&share_destination_id=MjUwMzkwODY4LTE3NDEzNzQ4OTc1MDU=&pd=0Gwc6O8C&hl=en_US&send_time=1741374897&actBtn=null&trans_data=%7B%22platform%22%3A1%2C%22cv%22%3A%2223.46.1%22%2C%22languages%22%3A%22en%22%7D&sep=ns_foryou_blend_exp_25q1-v5%2Cns_foryou_model_exp_25q1-v3%2Cns_local_strategy_25q1_exp-v4%2Cns_foryou_recall_exp_25q1-v5%2Cns_foryou_rank_exp_25q1-v2

I have a problem with this statement:
The Savonoski Crater is a round hole in southwestern Alaska that scientists have long struggled to explain due to a lack of geological evidence. However, there is a scientific explanation for this lack of evidence, so we can confidently say that the hole is neither supernatural nor an alien creation.

The crater is perfectly round, and nobody can tell for sure how it formed. and yet scientists are sure there is a scientific explanation and that they are confident the hole is not artificially (meaning alien) created

I am not disputing there is a natural explanation but the language used reminds more of medieval folk who would say "yes the horizon bends and ships vanish over the horizon but we can confidently say the earth is flat".

Scientists should not presume based on ontological dogma, that's unscientific.