Step right up, use the new Match O Matic Primary Sorter!

Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 


Who Did You Get for as your First Choice?
Mike Gravel 25%  25%  [ 2 ]
Fred Thompson 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Mike Huckabee 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Mitt Romney 13%  13%  [ 1 ]
Ron Paul 13%  13%  [ 1 ]
John Edwards 25%  25%  [ 2 ]
Chris Dodd 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Rudy Guliani 13%  13%  [ 1 ]
Barack Obama 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Sam Brownback 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Duncan Hunter 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Tom Tancredo 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Joe Biden 13%  13%  [ 1 ]
Bill Richardson 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Hillary Clinton 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 8

sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

23 Feb 2008, 12:51 am

Match O Matic FOR PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY


My three was
3. Ron Paul ( I am shocked! who knew!?!)
2. Dennis Kucinich ( and I am almost as shocked!)
1. and some how I knew Mike Gravel

so. . if you ask me about the people still in the race, I am not even close!

Merle



gwenevyn
l'esprit de l'escalier
l'esprit de l'escalier

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,443

23 Feb 2008, 1:27 am

1. Dennis Kucinich
2. Duncan Hunter
3. Chris Dodd


Meh... >_< Further evidence that I should not bother voting. Not only have these guys dropped out, my top match only scores 5 out of 11 and I'd rather have a gravel milkshake than vote for the other two.


_________________
The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them. -Antoine de Saint Exupéry


jonk
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 329

23 Feb 2008, 6:06 am

I got the same list you did, Merle, though Gravel was 2 and Kucinich was 1. But the second item under the health care, asking about priorities, only included answers that left insurance companies in the picture. I'd eliminate them entirely, removing them once and for all. The green visor boys in the back room, playing both sides (service providers and consumers) against the middle and laughing all the way to the bank, can go find another planet to play in. National health care, yes. But not via private insurance companies. We don't need the vampires. On marriage, I'd just abolish it. It's a weird soup of legal flotsam and jetsam, anyway, gets the gov't into acts of sex, and mixes religion and state in too many folks' minds besides. Taxes? Tax on wealth, not income. Best way to fight global warming? Planetary-wide cap on population -- no more freedom to breed at will for anyone. Everything else targets a symptom, rather than the core problem. None of these options showed.

Yeah. I'm a radical.

Jon


_________________
Say what you will about the sweet mystery of unquestioning faith. I consider a capacity for it terrifying. [Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]


sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

23 Feb 2008, 1:10 pm

jonk wrote:
I got the same list you did, Merle, though Gravel was 2 and Kucinich was 1. But the second item under the health care, asking about priorities, only included answers that left insurance companies in the picture. I'd eliminate them entirely, removing them once and for all. The green visor boys in the back room, playing both sides (service providers and consumers) against the middle and laughing all the way to the bank, can go find another planet to play in. National health care, yes. But not via private insurance companies. We don't need the vampires. On marriage, I'd just abolish it. It's a weird soup of legal flotsam and jetsam, anyway, gets the gov't into acts of sex, and mixes religion and state in too many folks' minds besides. Taxes? Tax on wealth, not income. Best way to fight global warming? Planetary-wide cap on population -- no more freedom to breed at will for anyone. Everything else targets a symptom, rather than the core problem. None of these options showed.

Yeah. I'm a radical.

Jon


Jon, Jon. . . . so few of my own pet ideas for government were not included in the questionaire. remember, it was made up of only the people that were RUNNING for prez, not what we WANTED to have run.


radical is good.

Merle



jonk
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 329

23 Feb 2008, 4:39 pm

sinsboldly wrote:
jonk wrote:
I got the same list you did, Merle, though Gravel was 2 and Kucinich was 1. But the second item under the health care, asking about priorities, only included answers that left insurance companies in the picture. I'd eliminate them entirely, removing them once and for all. The green visor boys in the back room, playing both sides (service providers and consumers) against the middle and laughing all the way to the bank, can go find another planet to play in. National health care, yes. But not via private insurance companies. We don't need the vampires. On marriage, I'd just abolish it. It's a weird soup of legal flotsam and jetsam, anyway, gets the gov't into acts of sex, and mixes religion and state in too many folks' minds besides. Taxes? Tax on wealth, not income. Best way to fight global warming? Planetary-wide cap on population -- no more freedom to breed at will for anyone. Everything else targets a symptom, rather than the core problem. None of these options showed.

Yeah. I'm a radical.

Jon


Jon, Jon. . . . so few of my own pet ideas for government were not included in the questionaire. remember, it was made up of only the people that were RUNNING for prez, not what we WANTED to have run.


radical is good.

Merle

Yes, I clearly noted that the questions were generated only from data gathered from actual candidates' positions and from nothing else, at all. That fact stood out like a sore thumb. I just figured I'd use the chance to post some of my own thoughts, as well. You gave me the excuse! :)

Jon


_________________
Say what you will about the sweet mystery of unquestioning faith. I consider a capacity for it terrifying. [Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]


richie
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jan 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 30,142
Location: Lake Whoop-Dee-Doo, Pennsylvania

23 Feb 2008, 8:08 pm

1-Mitt Romney
2-Mike Huckabee
3-Tom Tancredo

I got all the drop-outs, I think I'll stick to primes instead of primaries.... :roll:


_________________
Life! Liberty!...and Perseveration!!.....
Weiner's Law of Libraries: There are no answers, only cross references.....
My Blog: http://richiesroom.wordpress.com/


JDoherty
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 252
Location: Sydney, Australia

24 Feb 2008, 12:11 am

I thought I'll give it a go and this is what I ended up with:

1. Dennis Kucinich
2. Mike Gravel
3. Bill Richardson.

I have not got much of a clue about them.



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

24 Feb 2008, 12:27 am

richie wrote:
1-Mitt Romney
2-Mike Huckabee
3-Tom Tancredo

I got all the drop-outs, I think I'll stick to primes instead of primaries.... :roll:


I love your dry wit! My great grandfather was Pennsylvania Dutch and I can hear it in your cadences of thought.

Merle



OregonBecky
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,035

25 Feb 2008, 1:13 am

Mike Gravel
Dennis Kucinich
Ron Paul

I think that Ron Paul is getting a collection of Timothy McVay type followers,


_________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.


matt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 916

25 Feb 2008, 5:32 am

1. Dennis Kucinich
2. Mike Gravel
3. Rudy Giuliani?

This poll has no "Dennis Kucinich" option.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,150
Location: Houston, Texas

25 Feb 2008, 5:47 am

matt wrote:
1. Dennis Kucinich
2. Mike Gravel
3. Rudy Giuliani?

This poll has no "Dennis Kucinich" option.


And there's no John McCain option either.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,150
Location: Houston, Texas

25 Feb 2008, 5:48 am

I got Gravel, Kucinich, and Biden.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!


sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

25 Feb 2008, 11:02 am

Tim_Tex wrote:
matt wrote:
1. Dennis Kucinich
2. Mike Gravel
3. Rudy Giuliani?

This poll has no "Dennis Kucinich" option.


And there's no John McCain option either.



yes, there is a John McCain option, Tim Tex. . . when I was making other choices to see what it would register, I got ol' John for my second choice, between Mike Gravel and Dennis Kuchinich!

imagine THAT!

Merle



DeaconBlues
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,661
Location: Earth, mostly

25 Feb 2008, 11:31 am

According to the poll, mine were:

1- Mike Gravel

2 - Dennis Kucinich (dropped out)

3 - Barack Obama

Now, out here in the real world, I tend to agree more with Obama's positions than anyone else's, especially the parts where he's willing to come to compromises in order to get legislation passed (for instance, all those times cited when he "voted for funding the Iraq War"? Check the record - in each case, he first helped defeat one or more even-more-egregious bills, while recognizing that the money had already been spent, and needed to be funded, whether one agrees with the war or not). However, some of the questions, as noted above, did not offer options with which I could agree readily (notably the questions on immigration, taxation, and desirable experience levels), so this may have skewed the results somewhat...


_________________
Sodium is a metal that reacts explosively when exposed to water. Chlorine is a gas that'll kill you dead in moments. Together they make my fries taste good.