Page 1 of 1 [ 11 posts ] 

Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

15 May 2008, 10:09 pm

http://www.bigpond.com/news/world/conte ... 246694.asp

Isn't this the pot calling the kettle black? Didn't Dubya's gramps bank for the Nazis?


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

17 May 2008, 7:41 am

I don't know but that avatar is creeping me out. 8O


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

17 May 2008, 3:03 pm

Quatermass wrote:
http://www.bigpond.com/news/world/content/20080516/2246694.asp

Isn't this the pot calling the kettle black? Didn't Dubya's gramps bank for the Nazis?

Yes, and Prescott was also implicated in an attempted military coup against FDR. Really though, actively supporting the rise of fascism is rather different from failing to find an effective means of stopping it. Besides, Bush is far exaggerating the threat posed. Not that I'm much of a fan of Obama's, though, for different reasons.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

17 May 2008, 4:36 pm

I don't understand what the grandfather of Bush has to do with W's speech?

If my grandfather killed a family member of yours, would you still use that against me?

:shrug:



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

17 May 2008, 4:41 pm

oscuria wrote:
I don't understand what the grandfather of Bush has to do with W's speech?

If my grandfather killed a family member of yours, would you still use that against me?

:shrug:

Fair enough. Let's just go by what W himself has done. Well, he's gotten a hell of a lot of people killed. I personally would view that as a negative, and I think most others would as well.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

17 May 2008, 4:43 pm

Orwell wrote:
oscuria wrote:
I don't understand what the grandfather of Bush has to do with W's speech?

If my grandfather killed a family member of yours, would you still use that against me?

:shrug:

Fair enough. Let's just go by what W himself has done. Well, he's gotten a hell of a lot of people killed. I personally would view that as a negative, and I think most others would as well.


By his actions of going to war, yes. But it at least goes with his motto of not speaking to the terrorist.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

17 May 2008, 4:49 pm

oscuria wrote:
By his actions of going to war, yes. But it at least goes with his motto of not speaking to the terrorist.

What terrorists were in Iraq before we invaded? I believe Bush speaks with the Saudis. Aren't those the ones who bankrolled Osama? And wasn't Osama himself a Saudi, along with most of the hijackers?

So much for not speaking to the terrorists...

But anyways, I would view "not getting people killed unnecessarily" as a higher priority than remaining consistent about "not speaking to the terrorists."


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

17 May 2008, 6:05 pm

Orwell wrote:
oscuria wrote:
By his actions of going to war, yes. But it at least goes with his motto of not speaking to the terrorist.

What terrorists were in Iraq before we invaded? I believe Bush speaks with the Saudis. Aren't those the ones who bankrolled Osama? And wasn't Osama himself a Saudi, along with most of the hijackers?

So much for not speaking to the terrorists...

But anyways, I would view "not getting people killed unnecessarily" as a higher priority than remaining consistent about "not speaking to the terrorists."


Saddam was a terrorist/tyrant and there would have been very little concession between Bush and Hussein.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

17 May 2008, 9:40 pm

Also, to blame all people of a type because some of them did something wrong... what is this called? It starts with an "F" and ends in a "y".



Thomas1138
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 470

18 May 2008, 3:46 am

I find it rather funny. In the Democrats zeal to gather President Bush and Sen. McCain together, they've opened up a huge opening for Republicans to run against one of Sen. Obama's biggest weaknesses.

Why they want their candidate to own an appeasment comment (President Bush's comments could easily have included dozens of people not named Barack), I have no idea.

Quote:
Isn't this the pot calling the kettle black? Didn't Dubya's gramps bank for the Nazis?


In a six degrees of separation it could be said so.

President Bush (41) served in WWII with distinction and nearly died when his plane crashed in the Pacific. There's footage of him being fished out of the ocean, but it's rarely seen.



CityAsylum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jan 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,190
Location: New York City

19 May 2008, 12:12 pm

Quatermass wrote:
http://www.bigpond.com/news/world/content/20080516/2246694.asp

Isn't this the pot calling the kettle black? Didn't Dubya's gramps bank for the Nazis?


I'm getting a 404 on that link ^, but yes, he certainly did:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/se ... dwar/print