The schools my children went to (in Georgia, as a year ago) also had corporal punishement. However, you had to not only sign an agreement, but you also had to be directly notified and agree to the specific instance.
Quatermass wrote:
I think corporal punishment should be left to parents, if anything. Use detentions.
With the above system, it was simply a means for the school to be a surrogate for being up to the parents. If a child commits an infraction deserving corporal punishment, the school can administer it in a more immediate (and therefore effective) manner. We signed the permission form, but if it had ever come to it, we probably would not have given permission, and would have opted to administer punishment ourselves.
Gamester wrote:
My point is, that if you want to discipline a student or child, make them stay after school and do manual labor around the school, like the janitor does, or have them do forced community service.
Making a child stay after school punishes the parents (who have to make arrangements to pick the kid up), as well as placing a burden on the teachers who have to watch the child. Doing manual labor is not only illegal (I can hear it now... "Georgia school institutes child chain gang"), and has the same issues, except would require greater supervision.
If you say to leave the punishment up to the parents, then the school should not be allowed to punish a child in any way. If you claim it's cruel for a school to use corporeal punishment (with the parent's agreement), then you are claiming parents should not have the right.