Georgia men claim hairy, frozen corpse is Bigfoot

Page 1 of 1 [ 15 posts ] 


Is this really bigfoot?
Yes, i believe this is an actual specimen of bigfoot. 11%  11%  [ 2 ]
No, this isn't him, but I do believe Bigfoot exists. 22%  22%  [ 4 ]
No, I believe bigfoot does not exist. 39%  39%  [ 7 ]
No answer (busy picking nose) 28%  28%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 18

jrknothead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,423

Hodor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 907
Location: England

15 Aug 2008, 5:52 pm

If Bigfoot really does exist, it's most likely an undiscovered species of Great Ape. I can't make out the picture though.


_________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig."


willem
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,148
Location: Cascadia

15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm

Looks like an ape suit without a person in it.


_________________
There is nothing that is uniquely and invariably human.


CelticRose
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,368
Location: as far away from Autism Speaks as possible

15 Aug 2008, 7:09 pm

I read the AP news story on this and they won't let anyone examine the body. They've also told three different stories about how they supposedly found the body. Their "proof" is an email from an entomologist -- that's a scientist who studies bugs.


_________________
Autism Speaks does not speak for me. I am appalled to discover that Alex Plank has allied himself with an organization that is dedicated to eliminating autistic people. I no longer wish to have anything to do with Wrong Planet. Delete this account.


spudnik
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,992
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada

15 Aug 2008, 7:26 pm

It's got Hoax written all over it, a picture of a cheap gorilla suit in a wet freezer, ya that's Bigfoot, I am convinced!
If it was real, the authorities would have bagged it off to the nearest university for proper testing.



jrknothead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,423

15 Aug 2008, 7:31 pm

Update: "Bigfoot" fails DNA test

Quote:
One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis.



And here's a hint at the hoaxers' possible motivation:
Quote:
Also present were Matthew Whitton and Rick Dyer, the two who say they discovered the Bigfoot corpse while hiking in the woods of northern Georgia. They also are co-owners of a company that offers Bigfoot merchandise.



Anemone
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,060
Location: Edmonton

16 Aug 2008, 3:16 pm

People see 'squatches all the time up here, but most people don't report it, either because they don't want to be made fun of, or they want to avoid the media circus.

Most of the time, you will not see large wild animals unless they want to be seen (or don't care). I've seen quite a few deer (but have never taken a photo of one, because it seems rude), and one bear (eating berries and oblivious to passers-by) but no cougars and no 'squatches. Other hikers up here have reported them, though. No photos, but why bother? Who'd believe?

As far as this specimen goes, how is anyone supposed to tell? And more importantly, why does an animal need to be dead and cut open to prove its existence? :roll:



Dogbrain
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 4 Aug 2008
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 290

16 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm

Anemone wrote:
As far as this specimen goes, how is anyone supposed to tell?


Easy--don't keep it in a secret location. Instead, bring it to a zoology department in a university and have it analyzed under a lot of public scrutiny.



Hodor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 907
Location: England

16 Aug 2008, 5:07 pm

Anemone wrote:
People see 'squatches all the time up here, but most people don't report it, either because they don't want to be made fun of, or they want to avoid the media circus.

Most of the time, you will not see large wild animals unless they want to be seen (or don't care). I've seen quite a few deer (but have never taken a photo of one, because it seems rude), and one bear (eating berries and oblivious to passers-by) but no cougars and no 'squatches. Other hikers up here have reported them, though. No photos, but why bother? Who'd believe?

As far as this specimen goes, how is anyone supposed to tell? And more importantly, why does an animal need to be dead and cut open to prove its existence? :roll:


Yes but at least other secretive large animals - you mention deer, bears and cougars - have been fully documented and proven to exist. Sure, new species of animal are discovered all the time, but they are usually small creatures found in remote, previously unexplored areas. If I ever visit America and get mauled half to death by a squatch, then I'll eat my words, but until then, I'm in the skeptic camp.

Image


_________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig."


nirrti_rachelle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,302
Location: The Dirty South

16 Aug 2008, 6:56 pm

You would think with all the camera phones, light-weight camcorders and technology that can take pictures of galaxies billions of light years away, someone somewhere would've caught a clear shot of a bigfoot.

That goes doubly for Lochness monsters, Yetis, chubacabras, Osama Bin Laden, ghosts and aliens.


_________________
"There is difference and there is power. And who holds the power decides the meaning of the difference." --June Jordan


twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

16 Aug 2008, 8:29 pm

Even the cryptozoologists were calling this junk.

Although for all I know they tend to be quite skeptical to try to maintain some kind of facade of credibility :lol: :chin:


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Prof_Pretorius
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,520
Location: Hiding in the attic of the Arkham Library

19 Aug 2008, 2:23 pm

It's a hoax, check cryptomundo for details.

Really, this is the same thing over and over, someone tells the 'media' that they have 'proof' of Bigfoot or Flying Saucers, or Dark Energy, and then they reveal...... nothing ! !!

Old News.


_________________
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow. I feel my fate in what I cannot fear. I learn by going where I have to go. ~Theodore Roethke


jrknothead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,423

19 Aug 2008, 9:01 pm

A Monster Discovery? It Was Just a Costume

Looks like willem and spudnik hit it right on the nose... it was just a costume, and the 'discoverers' admit now that they lied.

Quote:
In the end, it seems Bigfoot was nothing more than a frozen Halloween costume.

Last Friday, two men, Matthew Whitton and Rick Dyer, announced they had found the remains of the elusive legend, Sasquatch, better known as Bigfoot.

The two men had teamed up with self-proclaimed Bigfoot hunter Tom Biscardi, creating a media bonanza replete with claims that they had a real half-human, half-ape body in their possession. They even said they would unveil DNA proof and photographs confirming the existence of the new species.

But all the brouhaha over the "discovery" of Bigfoot, or Sasquatch, was for nothing.

Biscardi, who himself has a history of dubious Bigfoot sightings, claims the story started to unravel over the weekend. And he apparently tried to shift responsibility to Whitton and Dyer claiming the pair "deceived him." But several Bigfoot academics say all three men appear to have been perpetrating a hoax.

Biscardi claims he dispatched another Bigfoot "expert," Steve Kulls executive director of Squatchdetective.com, to Georgia to investigate the body, supposedly being held in a freezer.

Kulls, wrote in a news release posted on Biscardi's Web site, searchingforbigfoot.com, that as the "remains" thawed, it became increasingly clear that the men had stuffed a frozen apelike costume into a freezer.

Kulls wrote that when Biscardi confronted Whitton and Dyer on Sunday, they admitted that all they had was a costume.

"At this time the victim of this series of deceptions, Searching for Bigfoot Inc., is seeking justice for themselves and for all the people who were deceived by this deception, " Kulls wrote in the release. "Due to this event peoples lives have been disrupted and many people, so wanting vindication about their prior experiences were hurt. Let us all try to be mindful of such."



Prof_Pretorius
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,520
Location: Hiding in the attic of the Arkham Library

19 Aug 2008, 10:07 pm

~ahem~

As I was saying, always be sceptical whenever you hear about things like this.

I'm quite the Fortean, so I realize these things have their own reality, which doesn't overlap everyday reality...


_________________
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow. I feel my fate in what I cannot fear. I learn by going where I have to go. ~Theodore Roethke


Prof_Pretorius
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,520
Location: Hiding in the attic of the Arkham Library

20 Aug 2008, 4:16 pm

This just in ....

"Police 'hero' fired as Bigfoot claim melts away."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 572064.ece


_________________
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow. I feel my fate in what I cannot fear. I learn by going where I have to go. ~Theodore Roethke